T1B

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science- ... mp-n708186

The moth's habitat extends from Southern California in the U.S. through Baja California in Mexico.

I wonder if the tremendous, beautiful new wall will split up any moth families.

The Big Pickle wrote:T.R.O.T.S.

THIS

FUKKKKING

SPAM!!!!!!!!

Jealous, much? Try a bit harder not to suck so much.

At least his response stayed. My sucked so much it got swallowed. I'll make it briefer: this is an honor for Trump, not an insult. The wall needs to go up because business is strong arming politicians to impede law enforcement from doing its job. Let the law be enforced, less cries for a wall.

Innocent Bystander wrote:The wall needs to go up because business is strong arming politicians to impede law enforcement from doing its job. Let the law be enforced, less cries for a wall.

Try to make sense, please.

Mikey wrote:

Innocent Bystander wrote:The wall needs to go up because business is strong arming politicians to impede law enforcement from doing its job. Let the law be enforced, less cries for a wall.

Try to make sense, please.

It made perfect sense to me.

Rack IB!!!!

The Big Pickle wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Innocent Bystander wrote:The wall needs to go up because business is strong arming politicians to impede law enforcement from doing its job. Let the law be enforced, less cries for a wall.

Try to make sense, please.

It made perfect sense to me.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement.

Mikey, a wall is tangible. You can touch it, taste it, see it. Law enforcement is intangible. When there is an absence of the intangible, people are more likely to demand tangible proof.

Example: your warehouse has thieves. Every month supplies go missing. Management requests the thefts to stop, but middle management doesn't see anything wrong with taking supplies for the kid's school or prescriptions for grandma's upset tummy, toilet paper/cleaning chemicals/tools home. The business'bottom line is foreign, they think the business can absorb the theft and it saves them personal money.

The tangible effort would be a security system.

Honor systems only work when they are honored. Our border is not being honored. Those entrusted with securing it are not being allowed to do their job because business depends on someone else paying certain costs. Right now, we don't even have dimmy cameras with LED instead of tapes.

A wall is an effort.

Does this make better sense?

Mikey edited out 'why am I not surprised.' That's cute. Where are we wrong in tjis one, though, Mikey?

We should absolutely set up penalties to employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. At the same time the Feds should shut off aid to cities who want to harbor lawbreakers.

Left Seater wrote:We should absolutely set up penalties to employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens.

There are, but they're slaps on the wrist. And there's little enforcement.

If we shored up the penalties & devoted resources to enforcement a wall wouldn't be necessary.

Left Seater wrote:At the same time the Feds should shut off aid to cities who want to harbor lawbreakers.

Define "harbor" please.

Shelter

i.e. Sanctuary Cities

Damn near every city checks for criminal warrants if someone is stopped or arrested. In those instances they have no problem holding and alerting other states and cities. Yet they won't be k an immigration database? By not doing so they are actively choosing to enforce some laws but not others. Of course that would fly for citizens of those cities to follow only certain laws.

Yeah all of that is bullshit. Learn a little bit about jurisdiction and get back to me.

The Feds hold the purse strings far more than cities or most states do. Feds should cut grants and dollars to cities that won't turn over criminals.

Ah extortion. At least you figured out jurisdiction. This country needs less extortion not more.

Moving Sale wrote:Ah extortion. At least you figured out jurisdiction. This country needs less extortion not more.

What violence is the federal government threatening?

So speed limits are extortion in your book?

Yes.

DiS,
Yeah that's not the definition of extortion.

Moving Sale wrote:Yes.

DiS,
Yeah that's not the definition of extortion.

Yes it is.

Good grief.

Definition of extort
transitive verb
: to obtain from a person by force, intimidation, or undue or illegal power :