T1B

...have to put it down on applications?

Isn't this a conversation you should be having with your parole officer? Besides the "500 foot radius of a school", I'm not sure how it would apply to you personally.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:Isn't this a conversation you should be having with your parole officer? Besides the "500 foot radius of a school", I'm not sure how it would apply to you personally.

Finally a decent post from you without the failed attempt at humour.

So if an employee has to provide notifications of convictions to get work...

why shouldn't corporations?

88 wrote:I agree that they should too. Why not simply keep a master list for all government vendors to access? It would take the regulatory burden and compliance cost off small contractors who have never done anything wrong, while ensuring that bad contractors get identified as such.

Why do you even try to have a conversation with a PEDO or a midget crazy lawyer?

You can't change their opinion about anything no matter how flawless your argument.


People like pedo in seattle will always hate trump
and midgets like MS will always be midgets.

You can't change their minds...their DNA is permanent and nothing you say can change it.


The only way to combat these fukkkking freaks is to tell them to "FUKKKK OFF AND DIE!"

Sadly, the only convictions liberals have besides ones with which the court is involved are those which involve anti-American thoughts and activity...

Rooster wrote:Sadly, the only convictions liberals have besides ones with which the court is involved are those which involve anti-American thoughts and activity...

"Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels." - Samual Johnson

Please tell us how bad-mouthing Gold Star parents is American

Please tell us how American it is for POTUS to say he's not responsible for the death of a SEAL on an operation he authorized as CinC.

Papa Willie wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:...have to put it down on applications?

Without question.

And yes - that should apply to corporations, too.

That's my position.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Rooster wrote:Sadly, the only convictions liberals have besides ones with which the court is involved are those which involve anti-American thoughts and activity...

"Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels." - Samual Johnson

Please tell us how bad-mouthing Gold Star parents is American

Please tell us how American it is for POTUS to say he's not responsible for the death of a SEAL on an operation he authorized as CinC.

There was a day when I didn't view liberals as being my enemy. It started slowly back in the Bush years, but it became apparent the Left had no interest in civil discourse. Anyone who disagreed with them on any particular policy was, depending on the topic, either racist, a homophobe, misogynist, and now most recently, an Islamaphobe. It was their method of shutting down discussion and debate. Subsequently, that slide toward the suspension of free speech has accelerated producing violence and assaults, as evidenced by the "tolerant" and safe space loving college students at Middlebury College.

If you want to see the future of the 1st Amendment and eventual re-education camps across the United States, look no further than your local college and university.

As for the death of a Navy SEAL, he died doing what he loved doing-- an op. That's not to say he welcomed death, but the risk of it was known and embraced. He knew it could happen, maybe even knew it was likely, but that was what he chose to do. I'd also point out that no SEAL was ever coerced into being a SEAL. It was their career goal, the pinnacle of their art form, and something these men eat, drink, sleep, breathe to do. By you saying what you have said, it is a backhanded slap to these warriors because it implies cowardice-- that they would if they could avoid armed confrontation due to the risk of injury or death. And it goes to show you don't understand their mentality at all.

Finally, this particular operation was formed and produced by JSOC under the auspices of the Obama administration. The timing of it worked out that it occurred under Trump's watch, so yes, he is ultimately responsible. But make no mistake, these men don't go looking for someone to blame if the plan goes south. It's the nature of the business.

Rooster wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Rooster wrote:Sadly, the only convictions liberals have besides ones with which the court is involved are those which involve anti-American thoughts and activity...

"Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels." - Samual Johnson

Please tell us how bad-mouthing Gold Star parents is American

Please tell us how American it is for POTUS to say he's not responsible for the death of a SEAL on an operation he authorized as CinC.

There was a day when I didn't view liberals as being my enemy. It started slowly back in the Bush years, but it became apparent the Left had no interest in civil discourse. Anyone who disagreed with them on any particular policy was, depending on the topic, either racist, a homophobe, misogynist, and now most recently, an Islamaphobe. It was their method of shutting down discussion and debate. Subsequently, that slide toward the suspension of free speech has accelerated producing violence and assaults, as evidenced by the "tolerant" and safe space loving college students at Middlebury College.

If you want to see the future of the 1st Amendment and eventual re-education camps across the United States, look no further than your local college and university.

Yeah, the conservatives are all about free speech. Just ask the Dixie Chicks.

As for the death of a Navy SEAL, he died doing what he loved doing-- an op. That's not to say he welcomed death, but the risk of it was known and embraced. He knew it could happen, maybe even knew it was likely, but that was what he chose to do. I'd also point out that no SEAL was ever coerced into being a SEAL. It was their career goal, the pinnacle of their art form, and something these men eat, drink, sleep, breathe to do. By you saying what you have said, it is a backhanded slap to these warriors because it implies cowardice-- that they would if they could avoid armed confrontation due to the risk of injury or death. And it goes to show you don't understand their mentality at all.

Finally, this particular operation was formed and produced by JSOC under the auspices of the Obama administration. The timing of it worked out that it occurred under Trump's watch, so yes, he is ultimately responsible. But make no mistake, these men don't go looking for someone to blame if the plan goes south. It's the nature of the business.

I agree with everything you said about the mindset of the SEALs. But I wasn't referring to them. I was referring to Trump pointing a finger at the military leadership as if he wasn't part of it.

So this mission....Did Trump have to order it to find out what was in it?

You really are a disgusting POS 88.

[quote]Yeah, the conservatives are all about free speech. Just ask the Dixie Chicks.,[/qoute]

You don't understand free speech, do you? The Dixie Chicks exercised their free speech. After those comments, others exercised their free speech rights. Sucks for the Chicks that their free speech ended up turning off their fans who stopped spending their cash on them, but hopefully they learned to engage their brain before they engage their mouth.

Left Seater wrote:

Yeah, the conservatives are all about free speech. Just ask the Dixie Chicks.,

FTFY, FOC

You don't understand free speech, do you? The Dixie Chicks exercised their free speech. After those comments, others exercised their free speech rights. Sucks for the Chicks that their free speech ended up turning off their fans who stopped spending their cash on them, but hopefully they learned to engage their brain before they engage their mouth.

And liberals don't have the right to react to conservatives exercising their right to free speech?

When the Dixie Chicks are ready to make nice I'm sure we will hear from them about it. Until then LS is still a retard.

Sure they do, DiS, just not in the manner that they have using ever since Trump became a legitimate candidate for president. Just like yesterday's fracas at that college, the Left-- particularly the young Left --have taken to physical threats, intimidation, violence, riots, fake hate crimes, and murder to shut down opinions which are in opposition to their own. And rather than take a stand against this, more moderate liberals sit quietly on their hands and allow the radical far Left hijack their party and everyone's freedoms.

Rooster wrote:Sure they do, DiS, just not in the manner that they have using ever since Trump became a legitimate candidate for president. Just like yesterday's fracas at that college, the Left-- particularly the young Left --have taken to physical threats, intimidation, violence, riots, fake hate crimes, and murder to shut down opinions which are in opposition to their own. And rather than take a stand against this, more moderate liberals sit quietly on their hands and allow the radical far Left hijack their party and everyone's freedoms.

Yeah, we sure are glad that the Right isn't violent.

Sincerely,
Kansas

Washington

Just because the Right isn't violent at college campuses doesn't mean they're not violent.

I don't see where it indicates that the Kansas situation shows the offender to be connected to the Right and City Data shows Kent, WA to have voted 70% for Hillary Clinton. It also had nothing in the news article about this being committed by a Republican or Trump supporter.

http://www.city-data.com/city/Kent-Washington.html

Are you aware of something that makes these specific Right wing crimes or were you speaking in generalities and assuming that because they were white males that they are GOP voters?

Rooster wrote:Sure they do, DiS, just not in the manner that they have using ever since Trump became a legitimate candidate for president. Just like yesterday's fracas at that college, the Left-- particularly the young Left --have taken to physical threats, intimidation, violence, riots, fake hate crimes, and murder to shut down opinions which are in opposition to their own. And rather than take a stand against this, more moderate liberals sit quietly on their hands and allow the radical far Left hijack their party and everyone's freedoms.

I don't have to speak for anybody. A bunch of very wealthy college students ( trust me, people who go to Middlebury are mpstly wealthy AF) apparently didn't want a neo-fascist to speak at their college. That is entirely and completely on them. Nobody else, not Diego or me or the DNC needs to condemn them.

I get that, BSmack. And corporately you don't own somebody else's actions anymore than I do. Yet I would hope it bothers you that a particular group has taken your party and driven it in a direction that I would hope angers you. After all, if your allegiance to the Democrat party is to what it traditionally stands for, you are in good company. But if you agree with the tactics and methods of the party that is garnering greater strength, then this neo-fascist you mentioned should be more up your alley.

Rooster wrote:I don't see where it indicates that the Kansas situation shows the offender to be connected to the Right and City Data shows Kent, WA to have voted 70% for Hillary Clinton. It also had nothing in the news article about this being committed by a Republican or Trump supporter.

WTF does Hillary getting 70% of the vote have to do with anything? Does that mean there's no republicans in the area? 15% of Alameda County voted for Trump, yet there was a Trump rally at Berzerkely.

And obviously you believe that if it walks like a duck & talks like a duck, it must be a rhino.

Wow. I'm shaking my head in wonder at you, DiS. Let me try this again, perhaps in a clearer manner: Is there any evidence in those two examples you gave to us that even hints that the perpetrator was a Republican, politically conservative, a Trump supporter, a Right wing crazy, a Tea Party enthusiast, anything???

I went to both links and saw one is definitely a white male and the other had a name that didn't sound particularly Asian or Latino, so to be generous in the absence of a photo-- which the article didn't have --we could assume he was white, but I read nothing that led me to believe they had any political leanings at all.

Is that your idea of a rebuttal? Look, I hate to make you look bad, but you're doing a fine job of punching yourself in the balls here.

The city data statistic is there to show you that (since your links did not show these men to have any particular political leanings other than not liking these people in the country) it is statistically probable that the Kent, Washington man is a Democrat-- a 70% chance in fact if he voted.

I guess you''re right, Rooster. After all, the democrats have been talking about building a wall on the border & enforcing immigration law just as much as republicans.

And I guess that all those attending that Trump Rally in support of Trump were democrats because 85% voted for Trump.

Statistics don't lie....

Rooster wrote:I get that, BSmack. And corporately you don't own somebody else's actions anymore than I do. Yet I would hope it bothers you that a particular group has taken your party and driven it in a direction that I would hope angers you. After all, if your allegiance to the Democrat party is to what it traditionally stands for, you are in good company. But if you agree with the tactics and methods of the party that is garnering greater strength, then this neo-fascist you mentioned should be more up your alley.

You don't even know enough about the Democratic party to call it by its proper name. I'm no more worried about angry rich kids in Middlebury then I am about your opinion of the Democratic Party. Those rich kids will probably wind up being Republicans anyways.