T1B

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/07/03/or ... ident.html

What cracks me up about this California couple is that they fit the stereotype: Prius driving Hollywooders who are gentrifying the neighborhood and making a ruckus with the locals. We've seen this kind of thing occur in Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and Arizona. Calis come into the state and try to California-ize their new town not recognizing that the locals resent newcomers trying to change the flavor of the place.

California is a cancer.

Yes some douche breaks the law by tagging their car and the Californians are the cancer. You are as dumb as granite.

Moving Sale wrote:Yes some douche breaks the law by tagging their car and the Californians are the cancer. You are as dumb as granite.

At least granite has a few legitimate uses.

The thing that cracks me up is that most of the people leaving California, that get shat on as California transplants, aren't actually from California.

Good riddance, I say. Texas wants you.

Lemme guess-- you both drive Priuses and are Bernie Bros.

Wrong on both counts.

Let me guess...you use meth regularly, have PTSD, and think Trump is God.

Wasn't me. My neighbors are all from Oregon or Mexico. Sure, the Calis can suck -- overpay for houses (housing isn't in line with income around here), and many do the line-item filling out the ballot, and just look for the "D" next to the name. But all in all, I've got better things to worry about.

But since we're talking about news stories from my area (surprised that one made national news), I would think Rooster would be much more interested in this one:

http://www.oregonlive.com/hillsboro/ind ... t_breaking

In summary -- dude hopped the fence at the Hillsboro Airport (smaller jets don't use PDX, they go to Hillsboro), and attempted to steal a helicopter at gunpoint. Cops showed up and shot him.

It's news when juiced up badge monkeys DON'T shoot someone.

Dinsdale wrote:Wasn't me. My neighbors are all from Oregon or Mexico. Sure, the Calis can suck -- overpay for houses (housing isn't in line with income around here), and many do the line-item filling out the ballot, and just look for the "D" next to the name. But all in all, I've got better things to worry about.

But since we're talking about news stories from my area (surprised that one made national news), I would think Rooster would be much more interested in this one:

http://www.oregonlive.com/hillsboro/ind ... t_breaking

In summary -- dude hopped the fence at the Hillsboro Airport (smaller jets don't use PDX, they go to Hillsboro), and attempted to steal a helicopter at gunpoint. Cops showed up and shot him.

Have to prop the three employees who were packing guns that got the guy to leave. Dude is lucky he made it across the street without getting run over. The fact that this has not happened already since basically anybody can walk through the gates and walk up to Intels contract jets, helicopters, Nike hangers, multiple corporate FBO's, is amazing.

Wasn't me. I'm here in Africa closing up shop for 'Murica's only UN operation. PET soon to follow.

I actually agree with most of that, especially this part:

schmick wrote: It should be illegal to vote in California elections if you can not show a California lineage of 75 years.

Probably because I'm third generation. But that would make the voting population pretty small.
I'd seriously be interested to see what percentage of California residents would qualify on that basis.
Just about half of the population was born here but probably half of them (at least) are from fairly recent immigrants (foreign of fly-over).

Pelosi isn't actually from MD, BTW. She was born in the old country.
Boxer is not longer in the Senate.
I guess you're OK with Feinstein, though.

OK now you've gone too far.

If I see you I'll fight you.

BTW...San Francisco was a major city when LA was still a bunch of Spanish missionaries and ranchers beating and molesting their Indian slaves.

As late as 1900 San Francisco had over 3 times the population of LA. And "frisco" is in Texas you fucking moron.

Mikey wrote:...LA was still a bunch of Spanish missionaries and ranchers beating and molesting their Indian slaves

What about San Diego?

:o

BSmack wrote:

Mikey wrote:...LA was still a bunch of Spanish missionaries and ranchers beating and molesting their Indian slaves

What about San Diego?

:o

Pretty much like LA but without the explosive growth in the early 20th century.

But that's not the point. I didn't claim that all residents of a particular city are trash and should be excluded from California. There's lots of stuff I hate about LA, but there's also lots of stuff that I really like. Same with San Francisco. Same with San Diego. It's all California whether you like it or not.

Same with Jefferson. I'd love to see those morons try to break away and make their own state. Give them five years without financial support from the rest of the state and they'll be living in rags without food or electricity and they'll be begging to come back into the fold.

BTW...I was born in San Francisco but lived in the San Diego area since 1973. I love the Bay Area but wouldn't move back there unless you guaranteed me about $5 million per year. Then I'd probably go back part time.

schmick wrote:cant you claim like Half Moon Bay or Pacifica?

Palo Alto.

But I was born in a hospital in San Francisco.

schmick wrote:I would never claim that geographic butthole as my origin....

You mean, as opposed to Norco or whatever God forsaken Riverside county shithole you live in?

You're just jealous of anybody who can actually go outside during the summer.

Woodcrest is a hell hole.

Moving Sale wrote:Woodcrest is a hell hole.

Basically situated in the taint of Riverside, which is pretty much Bakersfield South but with a weaker economy.

Mikey wrote: Same with Jefferson. I'd love to see those morons try to break away and make their own state. Give them five years without financial support from the rest of the state and they'll be living in rags without food or electricity and they'll be begging to come back into the fold.

Bullshit. The State of Jefferson will involve portions of Northern California, Oregon, Idaho and Washington. My new digs in Central Oregon will be in there. If you think for a minute that they would come crawling back, then you have no idea what the State of Jefferson is about. Telling the rest of California to go fuck themselves is the primary reason and to get away from the liberty grabbing Constitution raping politicians and policy's. That area of Northern CA will be welcomed and bring many good things to the State of Jefferson. Of course they have something that the Bay area needs in WATER. They will be able to ass fuck the Bay area on water charges, and should just cut their asses off completely and then see who comes crawling back.

Interesting in all this talk about generational Californians that nothing had been said about the invasion and overtaking of the shit hole state by all the fucking illegal Mexicans that will kill your economy a long time before their is any impact from Jefferson.

Derron wrote:

Derron wrote:The State of Jefferson will involve portions of Northern California, Oregon, Idaho and Washington.

Exactly what county is part of WA?

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Derron wrote:The State of Jefferson will involve portions of Northern California, Oregon, Idaho and Washington.

Exactly what county is part of WA?

There are as many variations on the State of Jefferson out there as you have on your ham handed fingers banging out shit takes. Some show it including almost all of Idaho and a good portion of Central and Eastern Oregon and Eastern Washington. Although the dudes over in Idaho make the most hard core right guys look liberal.

However the State of Jefferson ends up, so long as it does not include San Francisco, Sacramento, Eugene, Salem, Portland / Vancouver and Seattle then it will be fine. The idea is to get away from the pablum swilling liberal pukes (sup??) that rule the 3 states mentioned with about 4 counties each state making the vote and rules.

Mikey wrote:

Derron wrote:

Please you can do better than that. He must be a Californian because of that low capacity magazine he has on there, and he is really to stupid to not have enough mags on him to make him nothing more than a target after expending his 10 round legal California limit. If you are going to have a tactical vest on, at least make sure you have at least 3 to 4 mags inthe vest and lose the stash pocket. That is some low end AR copy, with some $ 59 optics on it that are worthless in most tactical situations.

At least he can take his tin foil hat off and warm up his sandwich in it at lunch time.

^^^
That, and if you are going to wear a rig, it should be a plate hanger. No sense in getting all tacticool if you're just going to get iced with the first shot to center of mass. Although that tin foil hat makes him look like a conspiratorial version of Robin Hood.

I would have thought that the first thing you guys would have noticed would have been the improper way he is holding his weapon. Screw a 10-shot magazine he wouldn't even be able to get off two shots.