T1B

Why does any regular citizen need a high capacity vehicle? We should leave high capacity vehicles to professionals, like delivery companies, transportation companies, Uber, food peddlers, etc.

Show me a reason a regular citizen should have a high capacity vehicle.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/so ... tp&ffid=gz

That Waffle House shooter allegedly had his guns taken away from him. Also it is alleged that his father got them returned to him. Thanks a lot Dad. Gun control at work.

Wolfman wrote:That Waffle House shooter allegedly had his guns taken away from him. Also it is alleged that his father got them returned to him. Thanks a lot Dad. Gun control at work.

But it is the guns fault. The system fails and the people who put the system together are too fucking stupid to make it work, so just ban the guns and call it good.

Left Seater wrote:Show me a reason a regular citizen should have a high capacity vehicle.

To run over Octomom?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The last high cap vehicle in the news that got people killed was chock-a-block full of angry lesbians and adopted children out on a starvation diet-- and hit the Pacific Ocean doing 90 mph off a cliff.

Yep. It's time to ban high cap vehicles. And for good measure we should limit all other vehicles' speed to 15 mph. Oh, and get a background check when purchasing gasoline.

Left Seater wrote:Why does any regular citizen need a high capacity vehicle? We should leave high capacity vehicles to professionals, like delivery companies, transportation companies, Uber, food peddlers, etc.

Show me a reason a regular citizen should have a high capacity vehicle.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/so ... tp&ffid=gz

Let's compare "high capacity vehicles" to AR-15's, shall we?

Vehicles are registered annually, legally require training, testing, & licenses to operate, and are required to meet minimum standards of safety.

AR-15's?
Not so much....

Good job, councilor (Trump spelling).

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Why does any regular citizen need a high capacity vehicle? We should leave high capacity vehicles to professionals, like delivery companies, transportation companies, Uber, food peddlers, etc.

Show me a reason a regular citizen should have a high capacity vehicle.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/so ... tp&ffid=gz

Let's compare "high capacity vehicles" to AR-15's, shall we?

Vehicles are registered annually, legally require training, testing, & licenses to operate, and are required to meet minimum standards of safety.

AR-15's?
Not so much....

Good job, Left Behinder.

Sure, but still why would anyone need a hi-cap vehicle? Those things are used in war. At best, no one should own and operate anything newer than a Calistoga wagon.

Diego in Seattle wrote: Let's compare "high capacity vehicles" to AR-15's, shall we?

Vehicles are registered annually, legally require training, testing, & licenses to operate, and are required to meet minimum standards of safety.

AR-15's?
Not so much....

Good job, Left Behinder.

Yes, lets compare vehicle to AR 15's.

The latest batch of bad news arrived Wednesday in traffic fatality estimates released by the National Safety Council, a nonprofit organization that works closely with federal auto-safety regulators. According to its estimates, 40,200 people died in accidents involving motor vehicles in 2016, a 6 percent rise from the year before.

If the estimates are confirmed, it will be the first time since 2007 that more than 40,000 people have died in motor vehicle accidents in a single year. The 2016 total comes after a 7 percent rise in 2015 and means the two-year increase — 14 percent — is the largest in more than a half a century.

“Why are we O.K. with this?” Deborah Hersman, the National Safety Council president and chief executive, said at a news conference. “Complacency is killing us.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/busi ... afety.html

So vehicles are registered annually. Most all guns sold in the US in the last 15 years have had to have background checks on the buyers. Check.

So over 40,000 people are killed annually in traffic crashes in registered vehicles, with licensed if not incompetent drivers and the vehicles have to meet safety standards. The process is obviously not working if that many people are killed by safety inspected registered vehicles with licensed drivers.

It turns out that big, scary military rifles don’t kill the vast majority of the 11,000 Americans murdered with guns each year. Little handguns do.

In 2012, only 322 people were murdered with any kind of rifle, F.B.I. data shows.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/sund ... -myth.html

So rifles were involved in 322 murders, and the type is not attributed to any specific model. Assuming that the AR 15 was even 50% of that number then they were responsible for 161 murders, then your AR 15 position means that less than .0040% of the total number of people killed by cars were killed by AR 15 rifles. Seems like a good enough amount to go after them.

No problem with cars, drivers at all. Fucking moron.

Diego in Seattle wrote: Let's compare "high capacity vehicles" to AR-15's, shall we?

Vehicles are registered annually, legally require training, testing, & licenses to operate, and are required to meet minimum standards of safety.

AR-15's?
Not so much...

You really aren't good at this internet thing are you? How do you function in daily life?

Certainly not all vehicles are required to be registered annually, require training, or require licenses to operate.

For exampl my father in law has an old ranch truck that hasn't seen a public road in decades. That vehicle is neither registered, nor inspected annually. All sorts of kids have grown up driving that vehicle without a Driver's License.

My wife and I have a golf cart that we keep at my mom's place. It isn't titled, registered, and you don't have to have a DL to drive it. We also have a UTV at her Dad's ranch that isn't inspected annually, doesn't require a DL to operate.

So in fact you are full of crap as usual. An AR-15 requires a background check in most instances to purchase. Want to make the claim that a vehicle requires a background check to purchase?

Do you actaully just make this crap up on the fly?

Left Seater wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote: Let's compare "high capacity vehicles" to AR-15's, shall we?

Vehicles are registered annually, legally require training, testing, & licenses to operate, and are required to meet minimum standards of safety.

AR-15's?
Not so much...

You really aren't good at this internet thing are you? How do you function in daily life?

Certainly not all vehicles are required to be registered annually, require training, or require licenses to operate.

For exampl my father in law has an old ranch truck that hasn't seen a public road in decades. That vehicle is neither registered, nor inspected annually. All sorts of kids have grown up driving that vehicle without a Driver's License.

My wife and I have a golf cart that we keep at my mom's place. It isn't titled, registered, and you don't have to have a DL to drive it. We also have a UTV at her Dad's ranch that isn't inspected annually, doesn't require a DL to operate.

So in fact you are full of crap as usual. An AR-15 requires a background check in most instances to purchase. Want to make the claim that a vehicle requires a background check to purchase?

Do you actaully just make this crap up on the fly?

You didn't make this thread about pickup trucks nor golf carts. You posted about "high capacity vehicles."

It's pretty sad when the OP can't keep up with his own thread....

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Left Seater wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote: Let's compare "high capacity vehicles" to AR-15's, shall we?

Vehicles are registered annually, legally require training, testing, & licenses to operate, and are required to meet minimum standards of safety.

AR-15's?
Not so much...

You really aren't good at this internet thing are you? How do you function in daily life?

Certainly not all vehicles are required to be registered annually, require training, or require licenses to operate.

For exampl my father in law has an old ranch truck that hasn't seen a public road in decades. That vehicle is neither registered, nor inspected annually. All sorts of kids have grown up driving that vehicle without a Driver's License.

My wife and I have a golf cart that we keep at my mom's place. It isn't titled, registered, and you don't have to have a DL to drive it. We also have a UTV at her Dad's ranch that isn't inspected annually, doesn't require a DL to operate.

So in fact you are full of crap as usual. An AR-15 requires a background check in most instances to purchase. Want to make the claim that a vehicle requires a background check to purchase?

Do you actaully just make this crap up on the fly?

You didn't make this thread about pickup trucks nor golf carts. You posted about "high capacity vehicles."

It's pretty sad when the OP can't keep up with his own thread....

Equally sad when you cannot respond and tuck your tail and run when you are proven wrong which is really quite often. Want to go back and revisit the AR 15 versus vehicle thing ??

You do have a rep for doing that..being a shit slinging monkey and then just not responding.

Liked the way the cop handled the stand-off at the end. Gave me a laugh at the 'man in a white van' description. Had that happened in the States, every white van in existence would have been blown to smithereens in about five minutes. Nuns and orphan passengers notwithstanding.

Oh no Diego. You can’t just brush your error aside. I specifically said a certain type of vehicle. You wanted to make a point and broaden it out to all vehicles. Hence the reason you left off the specific type of vehicle. You were wrong, and you were corrected as usual. Period. Full stop.

Dr_Phibes wrote:Liked the way the cop handled the stand-off at the end. Gave me a laugh at the 'man in a white van' description. Had that happened in the States, every white van in existence would have been blown to smithereens in about five minutes. Nuns and orphan passengers notwithstanding.

No just the ones with Negroes driving.

I wholeheartedly agree

It's time to ban large capacity vehicles.

Screw_Michigan wrote:I wholeheartedly agree

It's time to ban large capacity vehicles.

This has zero to do with the Paris accord. Try to keep up.

It's a smart policy decision to ban large capacity vehicles regardless. Tell me you knew.

Oh and rack Gobbles for the Octomom photo. Totally forgot about her.

Like throwing hot dogs down hallways, that's my style

Sincerely,

Duhhron

Screw_Michigan wrote:It's a smart policy decision to ban large capacity vehicles regardless. Tell me you knew.

Hey common ground! What with the damage one crazy person can do with a large capacity vehicle it is time we ban them. Running people down in a Smart Car or Mini Cooper is so much harder. This is a no brainer for the safety of the public.

Left Seater wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:It's a smart policy decision to ban large capacity vehicles regardless. Tell me you knew.

Hey common ground! What with the damage one crazy person can do with a large capacity vehicle it is time we ban them. Running people down in a Smart Car or Mini Cooper is so much harder. This is a no brainer for the safety of the public.

That's not why I support banning large capacity vehicles. But, hey, we agree!