T1B

Goober told me he was taking down some bush this weekend and that he'd PM me pics.
I said, "Don't do that"...
:x

Shocking. As usual the Latin American shit holes build things like that and cannot even have good water distribution systems. That 5 axle tanker at :18 brings in about 5,000 gallons which is gone in less than 2 minutes. Big city like San Paulo and you still have to used tankers/ tenders.?? That is a rural thing.

Looks like a fantastic job of urban renewal to me.

Oh man, LTS was right all along!

88 wrote:They used the same detonation pattern as used in WTC. Wakey Wakey.

You can see raging fire at ground level, as well as at multiple locations on the building.

Yes, very raging.

No doubt they'll hang a large, novelty Brasilian flag in memoriam across the street. Then invade Peru.

Then maybe a couple of years later maybe Chile, just for the fuck of it.

88 wrote:

Mikey wrote:Yes, very raging.

Hot enough to melt steel.

Who said that?

Oh... you.

lol


Great thread.

I think you've outdone yourself with this one.

88 wrote:

Mikey wrote:Yes, very raging.

Hot enough to melt steel.

Are you seriously comparing this piece of shit building--not steel framed--with the WTC towers? Really? Are you so fucking desperate to avoid the truth that you'll glom onto anything?

Look, here's some basic facts concerning basic physics as they applied to the events of 9/11
https://911planeshoax.com/2014/01/11/pr ... ed-on-911/

As for the Israelis--surely the most criminal nation in history (and why is Israel the only nation that we routinely refer to as a "state"?), of course they were directly behind the entire New Pearl Harbor

Here's some Israeli tenants of the WTC tower, enjoying the view, while scrunched in between the boxes of demolition FUSES


Here's some more info on these craven criminals..
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... d_why_the/

Or he's a cum guzzling attention whore.

Don't sell L'turd short.

He could be both.

88 wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Are you seriously comparing this piece of shit building--not steel framed--with the WTC towers?

My bad. I thought that is what we do here. Your link is incredibly compelling. Except for the fact that millions watched it happen live, and there are four planes missing, and all the people on them, and the people who did it left evidence proving that they did it, and everything we know about physics says what happened should have happened. etc. etc. etc.

What is your opinion on the flatness of the oceans?

The link I provided offers clear abundant evidence that the entire event was staged. What we thought we saw on 9/11 was actually very little. in fact the only thing we supposedly saw was the instant of the second tower being hit. No one saw anything else from any of the other three explosions. Interesting. As for the basic physics of which you are in apparent total denial, well what's your excuse? You say that "everything we know about physics says what happened should have happened," but of course you can't support this assertion at all. In fact you can offer nothing specifically to support any part of the official story. All you've got are personal insults against me. Well that's pretty pathetic.

Here's a clear approach to looking at what we thought we saw..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE

And some more basic insight as to the cover up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s04VUk_41r8

Well we know what we thought we saw, and what we were assured we saw. Yes, and we have the handful of videos, all tantalizing in what they show and don't show.

First, regardless of what we think we saw, an airliner cannot slice right into a steel-framed building, disappearing like a magic trick. Look closely at the very clear photos I've provided of the impact area on the second tower and you'll see that of course no airliner went through that slash of a hole. For that matter, an airliner cannot fly at 450-500 mph at that low altitude in the first place. The wings would fall off. The basic fact of physics trumps the video--which itself looks all wrong--and we must allow the probability of a very sophisticated fake. While both towers (and WTC 7) were clearly rigged for controlled demolition, the strikes have the characteristics of missiles. Notice how in the snippet of the one video of the first strike, you can't see an airliner at all--just a sudden explosion, like a missile. Why wouldn't anyone have noticed an airliner coming in over Lower Manhattan at a ridiculously low altitude? What, you don't think people on the Staten Island ferry wouldn't have noticed it? Someone with a camera? Same thing with the second strike. Why aren't there much more detailed videos of its approach--from miles away? There were lots of news helicopters and everyone watching in the whole NY area--looking out their windows. And no one saw that "airliner" until just two seconds before the strike? Really? And two seconds is the longest of the fifteen or so known videos--most capture less than a second of the "airliner" gliding into the steel building as though it was a knife into a birthday cake. Multitudes? Did you know that David Copperfield once made the Statue of Liberty disappear? Only to his audience, of course. :wink: