T1B

It's mostly brown people killing brown people (probably all Democrats). I'd think you'd be good with that.

I remember when gang violence was miniscule; when the drinking age for beer & wine was 18. Now instead of chasing pussy in the bars, too many of those 18-21 sub-adults get into trouble, big trouble.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:I remember when gang violence was miniscule; when the drinking age for beer & wine was 18. Now instead of chasing pussy in the bars, too many of those 18-21 sub-adults get into trouble, big trouble.

Seriously, that's about the stupidest comment I've ever come across. Tremendously stupid, even for you.
More underage drinking equals less underage violence? Really? I'd like to see some stats on that claim.

Also, the drinking age has never been 18 in California. Where are you from?

Mikey wrote:Seriously, that's about the stupidest comment I've ever come across.

More stupid than declaring this years 3 day NRA convention a gun free zone? Doubtful.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._hist ... e_by_state

I remember post 1984 that the gang problem seemed much worse Nation wide than it was in the mid to late 70's. I also remember my priorities as an 18-21 year old, and booty call was at the top of the list. But I can see that in California my statement isn't applicable since drinking age was always 21.

I do believe if the drinking age was lowered to 18 there would be less gang activity, not zero, but less. As for drunken kids, I live in PB and see plenty of 21 year olds doing the same stuff 18 year olds did. There really isn't much difference as inexperienced bar hoppers.

Papa Willie wrote:God damned global warming is causing this.

No, global warming is causing this.



I'll get some close up pics when I'm there next month.