Re: Calling out Jsc810
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:34 pm
Are you going to write a sternly-worded letter to someone?88 wrote:This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC. I’m completely disgusted.
Are you going to write a sternly-worded letter to someone?88 wrote:This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC. I’m completely disgusted.
Back off the ledge Pollyanna. This isn't even the worst thing that has happened this month.88 wrote:This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC.
BSmack wrote:Back off the ledge Pollyanna. This isn't even the worst thing that has happened this month.88 wrote:This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC.
BSmack wrote:Back off the ledge Pollyanna. This isn't even the worst thing that has happened this month.88 wrote:This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC.
He's just being a... Polyanna.Left Seater wrote:
Link?
I posted my take on this a couple of days ago.smackaholic wrote:How about you pops?
What are your thoughts regarding this hitjob on Kavanaugh?
Are you on the “by any means necessary” train with all the other Trump haters?
I didn't have to go far.Left Seater wrote:BSmack wrote:Back off the ledge Pollyanna. This isn't even the worst thing that has happened this month.88 wrote:This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC.
Link?
The irony is overwhelming88 wrote: This is the single worst thing I have ever seen in my life in DC. I’m completely disgusted. You?
Now how does it taste?smackaholic wrote:
As for the reps not bringing Obama’s pick to a vote, there is a simply answer.
They didn’t have to.
That's a pretty stupid statement, even by your standards.Sirfindafold wrote:Merrick Garland would be getting the same treatment as Brett Kavanaugh if Garland were Trump's nominee.
Who read it to you?Goober McTuber wrote:That's a pretty stupid statement, even by your standards.Sirfindafold wrote:Merrick Garland would be getting the same treatment as Brett Kavanaugh if Garland were Trump's nominee.
Your mom when she took my dick out of her mouth for a moment.Sirfindafold wrote:Who read it to you?Goober McTuber wrote:That's a pretty stupid statement, even by your standards.Sirfindafold wrote:Merrick Garland would be getting the same treatment as Brett Kavanaugh if Garland were Trump's nominee.
Yes, you really are that stupid.With President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, the race is on to characterize his judicial philosophy. As our colleague Kelly Rader of Yale University pointed out, before the nomination of Garland, the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, was even formally announced, there was a series of back-and-forth edits to his description as “a judicial moderate” and “a strong liberal” on Wikipedia. On Wednesday, the New York Times stepped into the fray, publishing a chart that showed Garland as nearly indistinguishable ideologically from reliably liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan.
You think Sirfuckafist's mother is a child? Trust me, she's an ugly old hag.Papa Willie wrote:Pedo.Goober McTuber wrote:Your mom when she took my dick out of her mouth for a moment.
Your reading skills are marginal at best. You are thoroughly incapable of following a thread and carrying on a conversation. She read something to me that was written today, you incredibly stupid fuckbucket. You post like a 12-year-old retard.Papa Willie wrote:And you were a whole helluva lot older than her when you got a hold of her. Like you couldn't figure that one out? Fuck if you aren't dumb.Goober McTuber wrote:You think Sirfuckafist's mother is a child? Trust me, she's an ugly old hag.
No, you weren't. Just face up to your peanut-sized brain.Meltspray wrote:Relax, buddy. I'm just trolling you. :grin:
We’ll see how it tastes after this is over. If the republicans can’t find their nutsacks and Kavanaugh is defeated, it wouldn’t surprise me if republican voters sit home in disgust and the dems take control.Screw_Michigan wrote:Now how does it taste?smackaholic wrote:
As for the reps not bringing Obama’s pick to a vote, there is a simply answer.
They didn’t have to.
Allegations you stupid fuck. No criminal charges, no trial, no civil trial or verdict. Statue of limitations long expired on anything criminal and not much chance of proving anything any way. You and all the others have absolutely jack shit on him so shut the fuck up now.Jsc810 wrote: In this case, you have allegations that Trump's nominee participated in a gang rape of a woman, as well as other sexual misconduct with other women. As well as him giving false testimony in his confirmation hearings for the appeals court.
Vetting ?? That would be a back ground investigation with facts and established data and decisions made based upon true fact, not some kind of shit show circus.What's wrong with vetting a candidate who would receive a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS?
Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breath something other than Derron's used gym sock.Derron wrote:Statue of limitations
So you are saying Joe Biden is wrong and doesn’t know what he is talking about?The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. The FBI explicitly does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion. Period! They say he said, she said, and they said, period. So when people wave an FBI report before you, understand they do not, they do not, they do not reach conclusions. They do not make recommendations.
Did Neil Kinnock write that?Left Seater wrote:So you are saying Joe Biden is wrong and doesn’t know what he is talking about?The next person who refers to an FBI report as being worth anything obviously doesn’t understand anything. The FBI explicitly does not in this or any other case reach a conclusion. Period! They say he said, she said, and they said, period. So when people wave an FBI report before you, understand they do not, they do not, they do not reach conclusions. They do not make recommendations.