T1B

Exactly.

Yes, because one anecdote changes years of recorded data.

Me have to drink 'em heap big firewater to lay pipe to ugly paleface squaw in tee-pee. Ugh.

Trump should donate $976.56 to Warren’s favorite charity— you know, 1/1024th of the million dollars he said he’d give if she took a DNA test to prove her Indian-ess.

Huh, so Amerikkka's sorded one drop racial history doesn't apply to Warren, according to racist Trump Tards.

Funny how that happens.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Huh, so Amerikkka's sorded one drop racial history doesn't apply to Warren, according to racist Trump Tards.

Funny how that happens.

“Sorded”? How about sordid or even sworded? Maybe sort of?

Screwy is tarded.

BSmack wrote:years of recorded data.

Of all the times affirmative action has shit the bed. Thanks.

L45B wrote:

BSmack wrote:years of recorded data.

Of all the times affirmative action has shit the bed. Thanks.

You sound like somebody who pulled a solid 1.6 in high school and then blamed AA because you didn't get accepted to the local JC.

You must be very close to someone who fits that description. You probably rounded up the GPA to appear less specific.

Didn't know you were from Kansas City.

Mikey wrote:Didn't know you were from Kansas City.

Lon Gisland, close enough.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Huh, so Amerikkka's sorded one drop racial history doesn't apply to Warren, according to racist Trump Tards.

Funny how that happens.

Nah. But you want to know what’s really funny? Rachael Dolezal, Shaun King, Elizabeth Warren, and Ward Churchill doing the math and seeing that if gender, sexual orientation, and everything else that has to do identity politics is all an artificial construct, then obviously race is too, so why not get some of that and ride the gravy train into the Democrat Party station? All that was once old becomes new again, and it is now fashionable to revert back to and reclaim the antebellum South’s “one drop rule of invisible darkness,” despite its overtly racist origins.

And they say you can’t ever go back home. Senator Robert Byrd would love the New Democrat Party. He could put on his pointy Grand Wizard of Cyclopian Downy White Freshness hat again.

I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

Goober McTuber wrote:I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

My shoes could use a shine.

Mikey wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

My shoes could use a shine.

How would you even know? You probably haven't seen them since the 80's, lard-ass.

Nikki Haley bringing the funnay:

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/10/19/n ... d-dna-test

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

My shoes could use a shine.

How would you even know? You probably haven't seen them since the 80's, lard-ass.

At least I wear shoes, Gord.

Mikey wrote:
At least I wear shoes, Gord.

Snowshoes are still shoes, you know. :x

BSmack wrote:Yes, because one anecdote changes years of recorded data.

Years of data show that there is a distinct advantage to not being white, particularly in the public sector or academia. Minorities with lower scores are admitted. Well, unless you’re a slope. Then you have to score better than whitey.

She told them she was an injun despite knowing she wasn’t for one reason. She knew it could help get her in the door. She also knew no one was likely to check on it as they don’t really give a fukk.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote: Years of data show that there is a distinct advantage to not being white

Maybe the dumbest take made on this board in years

Screw_Michigan wrote:

smackaholic wrote: Years of data show that there is a distinct advantage to not being white

Maybe the dumbest take made on this board in years

Nice liberal spin with the out of context quote there you fucking moron.

Derron, come in to Tune Town.

Goober McTuber wrote:I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

Everything is starting to make sense now.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

smackaholic wrote: Years of data show that there is a distinct advantage to not being white

Maybe the dumbest take made on this board in years

Like ANY of these idiots wants to be black.

Goober McTuber wrote:I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

Funny stuff, sucker.

Now, go with a different testing outfit.

100% guaranteed the results will be radically different.

I thought everybody was on to their scam by now,since there's been volumes written about it.

Derron wrote:Nice liberal spin with the out of context quote there you fucking moron.

It's a stupid fucking take no matter how you spin it. Answer the question: would you choose to be balck if it is advantageous to not be white in certain scenarios?

Dinsdale wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:I did that 123andme DNA analysis. Turns out I have African DNA about 6 generations back. Certainly comparable to Liz Warren's level of Indian DNA. I be lining up for reparations as we speak.

Funny stuff, sucker.

Now, go with a different testing outfit.

100% guaranteed the results will be radically different.

I thought everybody was on to their scam by now,since there's been volumes written about it.

Trace elements always fall within the margin of error. These results will show up randomly on anyone's test.

Screw_Michigan wrote:It's a stupid fucking take no matter how you spin it.

Answer the question: would you choose to be balck if it is advantageous to not be white in certain scenarios?

Does anybody else see the relationship between these two statements ?

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Derron wrote:Nice liberal spin with the out of context quote there you fucking moron.

It's a stupid fucking take no matter how you spin it. Answer the question: would you choose to be balck if it is advantageous to not be white in certain scenarios?

Who said anything about wanting to be balck, you jibbering fukktard?

It is a known fact that there are employment opportunities open to minorities that are not open to whites.

Actually, they’re open to all, but the door is held a little wider open to minorities.

Do you need exhibit A?

BHO.

How about posting the question “would you rather be white?” to him? Or more accurately, 100% white.

Do you think he’d go for it?

Do you think for one second, being Balck wasn’t a large part of the equation?

Ask the question to any successful Balck person.

I think you’d find that as a rule, successful people are fine with being who they are. Losers, no matter their color are likely to answer otherwise. Because they’re fukking losers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I know where you are coming from with your take on Barry, but...

America had 43 straight white males as president.

For generations, children have looked at the U.S. President picture list and have had an understanding imprinted into them that you only get up on this roll call if you are a white male.


Are you really going to now say that this one dude got to the top spot because he is black?


I guess you are.

That certainly played into it, 'Bat. When 99.8% of balcks voted for BHO you'd be hard pressed to explain in the wide richness of human experience and opinion how that occurred apart from a sense of racial identity and an opportunity to "have one of our own" in office despite tremendous differences in political outlook. Nothing and nobody is that monolithic apart from dictatorships and single party systems.

And I have no problem with that. It just means the GOP needs to work harder on their outreach like they have been. Witness the lowest unemployment for blacks since... whenever and rising income levels. It is teaching those still on the Dem plantation that real emancipation is within their grasp, if only they are courageous enough to think for themselves.

Rooster wrote:That certainly played into it, 'Bat. When 99.8% of balcks voted for BHO you'd be hard pressed to explain in the wide richness of human experience and opinion how that occurred apart from a sense of racial identity and an opportunity to "have one of our own" in office despite tremendous differences in political outlook. Nothing and nobody is that monolithic apart from dictatorships and single party systems.

And I have no problem with that. It just means the GOP needs to work harder on their outreach like they have been. Witness the lowest unemployment for blacks since... whenever and rising income levels. It is teaching those still on the Dem plantation that real emancipation is within their grasp, if only they are courageous enough to think for themselves.

Why yes, with your and Suckaholic's attitudes, I can't imagine why balcks aren't falling overthemselves to vote GOP.

"You're balck. It was easier for you than white men!"

smackaholic wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Derron wrote:Nice liberal spin with the out of context quote there you fucking moron.

It's a stupid fucking take no matter how you spin it. Answer the question: would you choose to be balck if it is advantageous to not be white in certain scenarios?

Who said anything about wanting to be balck, you jibbering fukktard?

It is a known fact that there are employment opportunities open to minorities that are not open to whites.

Actually, they’re open to all, but the door is held a little wider open to minorities.

Do you need exhibit A?

BHO.

How about posting the question “would you rather be white?” to him? Or more accurately, 100% white.

Do you think he’d go for it?

Do you think for one second, being Balck wasn’t a large part of the equation?

Ask the question to any successful Balck person.

I think you’d find that as a rule, successful people are fine with being who they are. Losers, no matter their color are likely to answer otherwise. Because they’re fukking losers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You live in a fantasy land.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
You live in a fantasy land.

Says the guy who is ignoring the fact that affirmative action is a thing. And that universities have had and continue to have easier admission standards for some minorities. (This has been eliminated by courts for some areas of the country as is asking the applicants race.)

Softball Bat wrote:I know where you are coming from with your take on Barry, but...

America had 43 straight white males as president.

For generations, children have looked at the U.S. President picture list and have had an understanding imprinted into them that you only get up on this roll call if you are a white male.


Are you really going to now say that this one dude got to the top spot because he is black?


I guess you are.

He didn’t get there solely by being Balck. But he doesn’t get there without being Balck. He was a community thug who stumbled into a Senate seat. He stayed there for roughly 15 minutes doing absolutely nothing extraordinary, then he was prez.

If he’s white, he’s a 3rd term Senator, at best. He’d more likely be in sales.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Rooster wrote:That certainly played into it, 'Bat. When 99.8% of balcks voted for BHO you'd be hard pressed to explain in the wide richness of human experience and opinion how that occurred apart from a sense of racial identity and an opportunity to "have one of our own" in office despite tremendous differences in political outlook. Nothing and nobody is that monolithic apart from dictatorships and single party systems.

And I have no problem with that. It just means the GOP needs to work harder on their outreach like they have been. Witness the lowest unemployment for blacks since... whenever and rising income levels. It is teaching those still on the Dem plantation that real emancipation is within their grasp, if only they are courageous enough to think for themselves.

Why yes, with your and Suckaholic's attitudes, I can't imagine why balcks aren't falling overthemselves to vote GOP.

"You're balck. It was easier for you than white men!"

If you are a reasonably bright high school kid with hopes of getting into the Ivy League or work in government, you certainly do have an advantage.

I am not saying that anyone is going to just give you shit. You gotta be named Kennedy or Bush for that to happen, but being Balck gives you a documented advantage. It is still up to the individual to take advantage of the advantage. If that kid drops out of high school and has 3 kids with three women by the time he’s 20, he’s fukked, no matter his melanin level.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote:

Softball Bat wrote:I know where you are coming from with your take on Barry, but...

America had 43 straight white males as president.

For generations, children have looked at the U.S. President picture list and have had an understanding imprinted into them that you only get up on this roll call if you are a white male.


Are you really going to now say that this one dude got to the top spot because he is black?


I guess you are.

He didn’t get there solely by being Balck. But he doesn’t get there without being Balck. He was a community thug who stumbled into a Senate seat. He stayed there for roughly 15 minutes doing absolutely nothing extraordinary, then he was prez.

If he’s white, he’s a 3rd term Senator, at best. He’d more likely be in sales.

Bingo. BHO was and is as ordinary, mediocre, and pedestrian as any run-of-the-mill senator whose name you can’t remember from a state that you think might be in the lower 48. Well, never mind that, all 50 States. Hawaii and Alaska produce plenty of Senatorial deadwood too.

Wow, Obummer is living rent free in your dome.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Wow, Obummer is living rent free in your dome.

We’re not spending all waking moments posting about him.

Barry’s name was brought up as he is the poster child for Balck dudes making it beyond where their talents should have brought them. He had the thinnest resume ever of a president. Even JFK and GWB who’s primary accomplishsments we’re picking the right vagina to make their entrances into the world had SOME sort of accomplishments behind them.

Barry had ZIP.

Oh yeah, Harvard Law editor if something or other.

But when asked what did he actually DO at Harvard?

Crickets.

He has one talent besides being half Balck. He can read a pretty fair TelePrompTer. Big deal. So can a bunch of other people. Put him in front of a crowd to talk off the cuff and he’s a bumbling fool. TGOF is a numbing fool as well, but he can at least be entertaining at times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk