T1B

Fake news.

Moore was not going to win regardless.

Lots of conservatives voted against him because he's an embarrassment to Alabama.

Yet Pelosi and Feinstein get reelected every time...

Carson wrote:Moore was not going to win regardless.

Lots of conservatives voted against him because he's an embarrassment to Alabama.

Yet Pelosi and Feinstein get reelected every time...

Moore lost by a razor thin margin. And Pelosi and Feinstein, last time I checked, don't have any kiddy diddling allegations hanging over their heads.

Fuck you are stupid. No wonder you were exiled from the US.

Sean Hannity: Did you date girls in their teens when you were in your 30s?

Roy Moore: Not generally, no.

Pelosi and Feinstein diddling little girls is a horrible thought; you're a stupid sick fuck.

All they have to do is find a microphone to demonstrate how embarrassing they are.

Kinda like you and a keyboard.

Sudden Sam wrote:Moore didn't have the support of most GOPers down here. As Carson said, he's an embarrassment to the state. I'd venture to say the majority of Alabamians had had their fill of that man. I think we owe Mr. LinkedIn a thank you. I'm not suggesting that I approve of meddling in elections, but, in this case, it was a win for Alabama...no matter what Doug Jones may do.

Russian influence or not, I saw no way that idiot was going to win.


To Spray's original point...it's awfully good to see someone finally say this was wrong and I'm ashamed to have been involved, instead of the whatever it takes to advance our agenda attitude that is so prevalent on both sides. Unfortunately, things have spiraled so out of control that each side will have to up their game and resort to ever more unethical practices from now on for fear of losing ground to the opposition. We are fucked.

Look, I don't want to pile on Bammer, but your proclamation that Moore was never going to win is incorrect. Moore lost by 1.5%. That is razor thin. He almost won.

Sudden Sam wrote:Hard to believe any human being could vote for that man

You're suggesting that Alabamians are human?

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:Hard to believe any human being could vote for that man

You're suggesting that Alabamians are human?

It has its problems, but it's still a far better place to live than that cow-fucking, inbred, cum-guzzling frozen pile of shit you live in.

I have no idea what you are babbling about, Melty. I live in God's Country. You live in Shithole, USA.

Papa Willie wrote:same old redundant

Uhm... uhhhhhh...

Nevermind.

Papa Willie wrote:billionaire faggot

Which one?

Papa Willie wrote:So Mikey - was it cool what this billionaire faggot was doing?

Meh - I doubt you'll answer....

Nope. Not cool.

Do you think Roy Moore would be a good Senator?

How the fukk Moore got the nomination is beyond me. I guess it is because in Alabama, there was a GOP plurality that still goes for his religious conservative brand of poltics. Fortunately, as a nation, the Reps are moving towards a more Libertarian outlook.....I hope. The dems on the other hand, are going towards full on socialism. And they don't have a problem burning down race relations to get there.

But, it'll be "democratic" socialism......we promise!!

Just like Norway!

The fact that the US bares little resemblance to Norway, demographically speaking is irrelevant.

As for the way the dems won that race, dropping a bomb on the Republicans, the day after the ballots were printed, it just shows how biased the media is. Ever wonder why that stuff didn't come out during the primary?

smackaholic wrote:
The fact that the US bares little resemblance to Norway

Norway bares what?




BTW...didn’t Trump once say that he wished that all immigrants would come from Norway, or something like that?

If I recall, his statement was something along the lines of if they were all coming from Norway, the dems would stop it.

Actually, this further shows his political ignorance. Norwegians, while the whitest people on the planet, do typically have a socialist bent to them. A better statement would have been to use pollocks. They are equally white, typically very smart and hard working, but they've got a long history of seeing how swell "democratic socialism" works and would be more likely to be Republicans.

But getting back to your point, if you could trade Cali's many millions of assort brown illegals for Norwegians, would you?

You probably won't admit it, but I think we all know the answer to that question.

Also, I suspect we'd run short of Norwegians before we reached the illegal brown folk number. We might have to tap into the Swedes and maybe a few Fins. Just keeps those damn Guineas and Greeks away. They' ain't pale enough.