T1B

A lot of Bama/Clemson fans aren't going due to cost of travel/hotels...


Hard to get off work at 7/11 and spend the next 50 years of your income ... for a day in the bay.


Sudden Sam... if you can get the day off at Quicky Mart... I'll give you a place to stay for the day.


Send me an email... and you're hooked up.

Papa Willie wrote:They’re not going because:

1. It’s on the other side of the continent. Nobody from where you’re at would travel anywhere over on the east coast.

2. Nobody on earth wants to slide and fall on human shit-slicked sidewalks. No one normal wants to be anywhere near that.

The South is the center of college football. The game needs to be here every year.

You could have said...3 dollars and 35 cents an hour... doesn't have wings.

I'm thinking that SEC fan would simply rather not get bum shit all over himself.

I am sure there will be a handful that go. Don't forget to bring your waders, Dwayne. They'll come in handy.

1) Pretty sure Santa Clara isn't known for shit in the streets.

B - SEC fans have something in common with the teams they root for -- an acute fear of airplanes.

Papa Willie wrote:
The South is the center of college football.

Such jealousy. Some Yankees invented a new sport, the entire rest of the country except the South started playing it (even in the U&L, which might as well have been an island in the Pacific back then). The South eventually gets all butt-hurt over getting their ass kicked in a war, and decide they need to get their revenge by beating them Damn Yankees at their own game.

It only took 100 years or so... congrats, I guess.

Papa Willie wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:1) Pretty sure Santa Clara isn't known for shit in the streets.

B - SEC fans have something in common with the teams they root for -- an acute fear of airplanes.

Papa Willie wrote:
The South is the center of college football.

Such jealousy. Some Yankees invented a new sport, the entire rest of the country except the South started playing it (even in the U&L, which might as well have been an island in the Pacific back then). The South eventually gets all butt-hurt over getting their ass kicked in a war, and decide they need to get their revenge by beating them Damn Yankees at their own game.

It only took 100 years or so... congrats, I guess.

https://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2018 ... e.html?m=1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/collegefoo ... verage/amp

27 of the top 50 are from where?

http://www.espn.com/college-football/st ... lines-2017

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ncaa.c ... tory%3famp

In the last 20 years, 17 of the winners of the NCG have come from the South.

https://blog.ticketcity.com/college-foo ... champions/

In the previous 20 years, 31 of the 40 participants in the NCG have been from the South.

This has nothing to do with the Civil War, Dins. If the Pac12 and the Mountain West were dominating the NCG every year, would it be logical to have the NCG on the east coast?

OK, so the south was a little late to the football party. You gotta cut them some slack. Pre WWII, they were simply too busy trying to keep from starving to worry about frivolous things like watching school boys run into one another. In the early years, the only place rich enough to put any effort into such an endeavour was the Ivy League. As time passed and the US became rich, other places got in on the racket.

But institutional racism was still a thing, so the fact that the south was over-run with skill position players was irrelevant.

Once BTPCF became a real money sport, the south decided to take advantage of the fact that they were the Saudi Arabia of colored boys and they've dominated ever since.

I don't think I've laughed this hard.

Too funny

Alabama gets rolled.

An SEC team has NEVER won a natty in a region where people can read and write.


Clemson wins the MNC.

And your shit team has never won a MNC is a place where they play football.

woops, I misspoke. They had a nice run during the roaring 20s and one in the 30s.

FiatLux wrote:Alabama gets rolled.

An SEC team has NEVER won a natty in a region where people can read and write.


Clemson wins the MNC.

You know who I am.


m2... Is "the truth".

smackaholic wrote:Once BTPCF became a real money sport, the south decided to take advantage of the fact that they were the Saudi Arabia of colored boys and they've dominated ever since.

I would have thought that Africa was the Saudi Arabia of black folks.

BSmack wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Once BTPCF became a real money sport, the south decided to take advantage of the fact that they were the Saudi Arabia of colored boys and they've dominated ever since.

I would have thought that Africa was the Saudi Arabia of black folks.

And you both would be intellectually challenged.

espn is in morning.


Too funny.


m2 called it.

You misspelled "mourning" in two different threads in two different forums.

Way to go, you shit smeared dumbfuck.

No wonder Bammer and SEC teams are afraid of flying. When they do, they get their asses kicked in spectacular fashion.

1-A is a corrupt, beyond rigged system. How dare SEC honk and Bama honk question any other team's scheduling? Fuck you.

Non conference, moron.

I'm guessing quite a few Bama fans went to the "natty" last night...over and over again.

Papa Willie wrote: I couldn't resist.

Since the BCS era began in 1998, HERE are the records of conferences vs. other conferences.

SEC: 234-191
ACC: 220-253
Big 10: 198-203
Big 12: 172-176
Pac 12: 168-144

The SEC against other conferences:
ACC: 101-80
Big 10: 48-34
Big 12: 47-35
Pac 12: 19-15

So, the SEC has played a little over a third of their OOC games against P5 teams?

A little math can help you avoid KYOA.

Papa Willie wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:Non conference, moron.

I couldn't resist.

Since the BCS era began in 1998, HERE are the records of conferences vs. other conferences.

SEC: 234-191
ACC: 220-253
Big 10: 198-203
Big 12: 172-176
Pac 12: 168-144

The SEC against other conferences:
ACC: 101-80
Big 10: 48-34
Big 12: 47-35
Pac 12: 19-15

What were you saying again, Screwdy? Don't you hate it when stats overcome feelings?

You are highly inept at a) following the specific topic of a debate and b) providing relevant evidence pertaining to said debate.

Just something I've noticed.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You are highly inept at a) following the specific topic of a debate and b) providing relevant evidence pertaining to said debate.

You're just parroting MSM lies. Why do you love liberals so much?

Wait until I post a graph of a completely unrelated and non-specific point. You'll get yours.

Porky's not very bright.


But, this goes without saying

I love watching Porky...melt


Too funny

Melty will be talking about 2018 BBOTY in June because that's all he's got as a tedious, takeless loser.

Screwball: Alabama doesn't travel
Melty: S-E-C! S-E-C!

Papa Willie wrote:How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.

If you had to convince a court room that the SEC does well in road games outside of the southeast, do you think it would be a good idea to provide generic SOS figures and overall records against other conferences predominantly including home games? Think about that.

No smack. I'm trying to help you improve your basic brain functions, logic, reading comprehension, etc. You can win the internet arguments you covet so much if you follow the nuances of the conversation and provide relevant data instead of getting angry and emotional and throwing out random links that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Papa Willie wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:I couldn't resist.

Since the BCS era began in 1998, HERE are the records of conferences vs. other conferences.

SEC: 234-191
ACC: 220-253
Big 10: 198-203
Big 12: 172-176
Pac 12: 168-144

The SEC against other conferences:
ACC: 101-80
Big 10: 48-34
Big 12: 47-35
Pac 12: 19-15

What were you saying again, Screwdy? Don't you hate it when stats overcome feelings?

You are highly inept at a) following the specific topic of a debate and b) providing relevant evidence pertaining to said debate.

Just something I've noticed.

How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.

I also rely on feelings. And I have a feeling that you're every bit as retarded in real life as you appear to be on this board.

Papa Willie wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.

If you had to convince a court room that the SEC does well in road games outside of the southeast, do you think it would be a good idea to provide generic SOS figures and overall records against other conferences predominantly including home games? Think about that.

No smack. I'm trying to help you improve your basic brain functions, logic, reading comprehension, etc. You can win the internet arguments you covet so much if you follow the nuances of the conversation and provide relevant data instead of getting angry and emotional and throwing out random links that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Well - at least your team beat Purdue by 10... It took Wisconsin 3 ot's to win by a FG!

Nice strawman, Melty. Keep reminding everyone how retarded you really are.

Road games, melty. He was referring specifically and exclusively to road games. For the umpteenth billion time, try to keep up.

Granted, I'm guessing the SEC has a pretty good track record in those games too because training young black men to run and throw a ball around is your greatest contribution to this country.

I think I understand the problem now.

When SEC has to travel, they chain all those balck boys together and make them fly in the luggage hold. It kinda traumatizes them a little.