T1B

How can anyone go to work each day and their job is killing babies? I pray for the innocents.

This pretty much sums up the morality of the Left.

Taxing the last 1% of a baby’s birth with 100% death.

This is the purest definition of separating children from their families right at the border.

All this measure did was to codify the tenets of the Roe decision in state law and to put said code as a part of the state health code.

Someone's gotta take out the trash. Are you angry at the garbage man, too?

L45B wrote:This is the purest definition of separating children from their families right at the border.

We all know you want these babies born so you can incarcerate them. Or perhaps starve them or exploit them. It's the GOP way.

No need for any of that when you can just cut to the chase and authorize REDRUM.

Sounds like an easy Final Solution.

Black and Hispanic abortion rates far exceed the proportions to their total numbers. By FAR.

If you really hated minorities, you wouldn't be taking a right-to-life position...you'd be throwing haymakers at abortion clinic protesters.

BSmack wrote:codify the tenets

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:Black and Hispanic abortion rates far exceed the proportions to their total numbers. By FAR.

If you really hated minorities, you wouldn't be taking a right-to-life position...you'd be throwing haymakers at abortion clinic protesters.

Of course...Buttsy, 88, Lefty, Carson, Derron, Rooster etc... would gladly sponsor/foster...

Do you re-read your own posts occasionally?

Screw_Michigan wrote:Someone's gotta take out the trash. Are you angry at the garbage man, too?

It would have been a good decision for your mother to make. But since your Daddy is Donald Trump and he pumped yo mama full, and you are his spawn, with him being pro life and all your ass was saved from the coat hanger. Good for you and sucks for the rest of us.

Derron wrote: It would have been a good decision for your mother to make. But since your Daddy is Donald Trump and he pumped yo mama full, and you are his spawn, with him being pro life and all your ass was saved from the coat hanger. Good for you and sucks for the rest of us.

What can I say? This was funny.

Papa Willie wrote:

L45B wrote:This pretty much sums up the morality of the Left.

Taxing the last 1% of a baby’s birth with 100% death.

Preventing the spread of defective genes is a tremendous plus if you ask me.

Fat slob from the land of inbred mutations says what?

BSmack wrote:All this measure did was to codify the tenets of the Roe decision in state law and to put said code as a part of the state health code.

Don't sugar coat this, dipshit. This has fukk-all to do with Roe v Wade, which I happen to think would have made a fine Amendment, but, as 88 said, is a shit POTUS decision.

It is now fully legal to murder babies, so long as they are on the wrong side of the uterine wall.

I suppose spray does have a point. They are taking out future liberals. Still doesn't make it right.

Perhaps this sort of savagery will finally get all sides to come to the table and do this right. An amendment guaranteeing abortion rights in the first trimester, maybe even a bit further, but also protecting the right of a viable child to not be murdered. And yes, it is murder. Any baby past 7 months can live just fine outside the womb. Trouble is, some of them would just be an inconvenience.

Papa Willie wrote: You fuck children.

"I prefer the term tenderly loved."

Sincerely,

smackaholic wrote:Any baby past 7 months can live just fine outside the womb.

Midget Lawyer has the brain of a toddler and he's been doing fine for a few decades now.

Walls are imoral, but murder 30 seconds before birth is fine?

Liberals are such a mess. Look no further than Bucmonkey that wants to make an arguement about fostering. Way to attack a straw man. Why not look into why so many babies from minorities are murdered? This has zero to do with 88 or I, yet you want to try to make this our problem. Typical liberal.

smackaholic wrote:Any baby past 7 months can live just fine outside the womb. Trouble is, some of them would just be an inconvenience.

Anything after 24 weeks requires a healthcare professional to verify that the pregnancy is either not viable or that the pregnancy constitutes a threat to the life of the mother. So stick that in your stupid pipe and smoke it up.

BSmack wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Any baby past 7 months can live just fine outside the womb. Trouble is, some of them would just be an inconvenience.

Anything after 24 weeks requires a healthcare professional to verify that the pregnancy is either not viable or that the pregnancy constitutes a threat to the life of the mother. So stick that in your stupid pipe and smoke it up.

Is that part of the law? Does the "life of the mother" need to be in question? I doubt it. As for viability, it would seem that if the child is not viable, well things will pretty much work out without legal meddling.

If it actually reads "health of the mother", then it is bullshit, as that is a broad statement that means nothing. Childbirf, by definition, is a minor health risk. But I think stats would show that childbirf is a lesser risk than late term abortion.

smackaholic wrote:If it actually reads "health of the mother", then it is bullshit, as that is a broad statement that means nothing. Childbirf, by definition, is a minor health risk. But I think stats would show that childbirf is a lesser risk than late term abortion.

Well, get your stats out and prove it.