T1B

Seriously, I'm tired of paying for these fat fucking slobs with our San Francisco money!



The United States would have the highest IQ in the World if we could sell "the south" to Liberia.



Head to 2:30 of the vid to see "Captain Porky Poverty" and where he lives.





Great vid... if you watch it all.



too funny !

I would like to see stats that consider affordability, rather than just income in determining how poor they are.

The fact is that a family making 50K a year in North Carolina has a quality of life far better than someone in coastal California or the Northeast making 60K a year, or probably even 70K.

Marty is one of THE dumbest people on the board and even he knows how gentrification works.

Except gentification involves deterioted neighborhoods that are renovated by an influx of more affluent residents.

This is more anti-gentification.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

You really are an idiot.
Dumber than Marty. Wow.

No one contributes less than you do 0.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

And yet I’m the one that knows how gentrification works and you are just beating your head against your keyboard and hoping for the best.

Kierland wrote:You really are an idiot.
Dumber than Marty. Wow.

What the heck?
:?
What did I ever do to you?

Joe in PB wrote:Except gentification involves deterioted neighborhoods that are renovated by an influx of more affluent residents.

This is more anti-gentification.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Meaning middle class and poor people are priced out and only the upper classes and homeless are left. See San Francisco.

BSmack wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:Except gentification involves deterioted neighborhoods that are renovated by an influx of more affluent residents.

This is more anti-gentification.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Meaning middle class and poor people are priced out and only the upper classes and homeless are left. See San Francisco.

Agreed, but there haven't been poor or middle class living in SF for decades. Only those very well off with a fairly recent onslaught of heroin homeless.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Agreed, but there haven't been poor or middle class living in SF for decades. Only those very well off with a fairly recent onslaught of heroin homeless.

You do realize that this process started 30 years ago?

Hordes of heroin addicts living on downtown streets, shooting up, passing out, & shitting on the sidewalk? Then committing some crime to fund their next bag of shit?

I believe the hordes have only been around for 5 - 10 years.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Would it be possible that all 50 states to have equal wealth? If not, then within what range of "wealth" should they be? Expecting such equality is not very realistic, is it?

Joe in PB wrote:Agreed, but there haven't been poor or middle class living in SF for decades. Only those very well off with a fairly recent onslaught of heroin homeless.

That is just more fake news from Joey the Dum Dum. There are still plenty of poor and middle class in SF, why do you think the gentrification is taking so long? Oh that's right you are a fucking idiot.

Wolfman wrote:Would it be possible that all 50 states to have equal wealth? If not, then within what range of "wealth" should they be? Expecting such equality is not very realistic, is it?

The 5 richest people (or is it 3?) should not have as much as half the country you stupid fuck.

[quote="Kierland"
The 5 richest people (or is it 3?) should not have as much as half the country you stupid fuck.[/quote]

Look the angry racist snowflake is jealous.

Why shouldn't these people have the money that they do have? What amount of money is too much? Why do you want to hinder inovation and risk taking?

In theory, in a constitutional republic with a free market system, nothing is wrong.

However in reality, if you look deeply into how these few mega-rich people accumulated their wealth you will see that laws have been broken.

Kierland wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:Agreed, but there haven't been poor or middle class living in SF for decades. Only those very well off with a fairly recent onslaught of heroin homeless.

That is just more fake news from Joey the Dum Dum. There are still plenty of poor and middle class in SF, why do you think the gentrification is taking so long? Oh that's right you are a fucking idiot.

Yeah the poor are living in the street.

No, if anything there is an exodus of middle class from SF and California for that matter. Certainly they aren't waiting to move in, oh yeah, and most middle class people in SF don't live there. Odds are there are more homeless moving into SF than wealthy or middle class residents.

Softball Bat wrote: However in reality, if you look deeply into how these few mega-rich people accumulated their wealth you will see that laws have been broken.

So let us know what laws Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Zuckerburg and Bill Gates broke or directed their companies to do so.





Then we can get to the follow up question.

TROTS this mother fucker. I listened to the video while working on some things I make money at, and that is one of the most worthless takes I have ever heard on the subject. Shocking..southern country's and the token south west shithole of New Mexico have poverty issues.

You would think that the Democrats are so fucking smart they would have figured out how to redistribute some government money into those areas.

Queerland wrote:And yet I’m the one that knows how gentrification works and you are just beating your head against your keyboard and hoping for the best.

You don't know jack fucking shit. Shut the fuck up and let the adults discuss the issue.

Left Seater wrote:
Why shouldn't these people have the money that they do have? What amount of money is too much? Why do you want to hinder inovation and risk taking?

I was just trying to show you why rich people get eaten. It has to do with bread and cake. Read a few books maybe you will stumble onto it.

Derron wrote:

Queerland wrote:And yet I’m the one that knows how gentrification works and you are just beating your head against your keyboard and hoping for the best.

You don't know jack fucking shit. Shut the fuck up and let the adults discuss the issue.

Enlighten us tiny.

Lefty wrote:So let us know what laws Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Zuckerburg and Bill Gates broke or directed their companies to do so.

I didn't say that they had broken laws, although they probably have, imo.

Read my take again.


The U.S. Constitution is our law, and it has clearly been violated habitually.

Hence, we've got a situation where a few very large fish are able to prosper, while everyone else takes it up the ass.

Joe in PB wrote:

BSmack wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:Except gentification involves deterioted neighborhoods that are renovated by an influx of more affluent residents.

This is more anti-gentification.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Meaning middle class and poor people are priced out and only the upper classes and homeless are left. See San Francisco.

Agreed, but there haven't been poor or middle class living in SF for decades. Only those very well off with a fairly recent onslaught of heroin homeless.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Actually, you have no idea WTF you’re talking about.

San Francisco giving Internet access to the retards in the south was the biggest mistake.

These retards don't even know what a honest days work is.

They are constantly looking for handouts from San Francisco royalty.

The South got their ass kicked for a reason.

They ain't bright.

They got their ass kicked because they were simply outmatched industrially speaking by a factor of about, ohhhh, a few thousand to one or so. The fact that they made a fight of it for as long as they did, shows they weren't that dumb.

smackaholic wrote:They got their ass kicked because they were simply outmatched industrially speaking by a factor of about, ohhhh, a few thousand to one or so. The fact that they made a fight of it for as long as they did, shows they weren't that dumb.

You can't make this shit up !


Too funny.

More troops, more guns, more everything.

The south was at a significant disadvantage in every category. It was comparable to Poland holding off Nazi Germany by itself for over 3 years.

The South did have one strategic advantage. In typical SEC fashion, they rarely played a road game. When they did, well, you know how that went.

Softball Bat wrote: However in reality, if you look deeply into how these few mega-rich people accumulated their wealth you will see that laws have been broken.

Softball Bat wrote: I didn't say that they had broken laws, although they probably have, imo.

Read my take again.

And you question my reading comprehension? The more times I re-read your take, the dumber you look.

You have implied their wealth is because of breaking laws. If so hook us up to what laws they or their companies broke. Otherwise you have nothing.

It isn't my fault that you are a simpleton.

poptart wrote:In theory, in a constitutional republic with a free market system, nothing is wrong.

However in reality, if you look deeply into how these few mega-rich people accumulated their wealth you will see that laws have been broken.

Yep.

So link us up to the laws they broke are breaking. It is simple

26 Stat. 209
You’re welcome.

Left Seater wrote:So link us up to the laws they broke are breaking. It is simple

You and Melty are two of the biggest simpletons I have ever encountered.



What Should The Penalty Be For The People Who Destroy The Constitution?

- Ron Paul

Softball Bat wrote:

Left Seater wrote:So link us up to the laws they broke are breaking. It is simple

You and Melty are two of the biggest simpletons I have ever encountered.



What Should The Penalty Be For The People Who Destroy The Constitution?

- Ron Paul

Can't blame the companies for playing the system to the best of their advantage. The blame goes with the shit politicians who make these rules. If we had more people like Ron Paul, things would be better. It is a shame the republicans never ran him. He would have beaten any democrat easily. I wish Rand had gotten it last time around.

Softball Bat wrote:

Left Seater wrote:So link us up to the laws they broke are breaking. It is simple

You and Melty are two of the biggest simpletons I have ever encountered.



What Should The Penalty Be For The People Who Destroy The Constitution?

- Ron Paul

Yet you still have not linked us up to any laws broken. Not sure why I engage when you are rolling but ignoring things is your MO as proven repeatedly.

Left Seater wrote:
Yet you still have not linked us up to any laws broken.

I did you fat stupid fuck.

smackaholic wrote:
Can't blame the companies for playing the system to the best of their advantage.

I can. They are mostly asshole fucks who should be taxed at 100%.

Left Seater wrote:

Softball Bat wrote:

Left Seater wrote:So link us up to the laws they broke are breaking. It is simple

You and Melty are two of the biggest simpletons I have ever encountered.



What Should The Penalty Be For The People Who Destroy The Constitution?

- Ron Paul

Yet you still have not linked us up to any laws broken. Not sure why I engage when you are rolling but ignoring things is your MO as proven repeatedly.

Then came Citizens United, the Supreme Court's 5-4 First Amendment decision in 2010 that extended to corporations
for the first time full rights to spend money as they wish in candidate elections — federal, state and local. The decision
reversed a century of legal understanding, unleashed a flood of campaign cash and created a crescendo of controversy
that continues to build today.

It thrilled many in the business community, horrified campaign reformers, and provoked considerable mockery in the
comedian classes.

https://www.npr.org/2014/07/28/33528838 ... -evolution



Corporations are not people.

Duh.



What Should The Penalty Be For The People Who Destroy The Constitution?

- Ron Paul