T1B

Papa Willie wrote:SF shouldn’t be considered part of America. It’s just too fucked up and embarrassing.

The problem is Denver, LA, Portland, and Seattle are just about there too. We can probably add Chicago, Detroit, and NYC. Seems the Democrat agenda is to turn the US into a 3rd world country, with a smaller middle class and more heroin addicted, poor, and homeless.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Fox News Joe wrote:Seems the Democrats agenda is to turn the US into a 3rd world country, with a smaller middle class and more heroin addicted, poor, and homeless.

Let me tell ya, you are one deep-thinker.

Denver is another city passing out needles, Portland has had a heroin problem for years.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Flatsux wrote:
Let me tell ya, you are one deep-thinker.

....And you aren't, but what would you call not enforcing laws, enabling heroin addiction, and letting cities go to shit?

Notice San Diego isn't listed. We have a Republican Mayor who enforces law, that what elected officials are supposed to do. As opposed to not enforcing laws, or only select laws.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:Denver is another city passing out needles, Portland has had a heroin problem for years.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Porky missed that episode on Fox News.


Psst... every city has a homeless problem. The only difference is people care about the most expensive, beautiful, and important city in the country.

You wouldn't be typing on this board... if it wasn't for the San Francisco Bay area.

FiatLux wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:Denver is another city passing out needles, Portland has had a heroin problem for years.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Porky missed that episode on Fox News.

And you're missing about 100 IQ points...

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:Notice San Diego isn't listed. We have a Republican Mayor who enforces law, that what elected officials are supposed to do. As opposed to not enforcing laws, or only select laws.

Hmmm... are these just tourists in San Diego ?

Papa Willie wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:Portland... just about there too.

At least those shitholes don’t have shit and needles in the street, though...

You're spreading fake news. They pick up ~1000 used needles off the street every day. And the residents have to hose the shit off the sidewalks themselves, since the city doesn't do it.

FiatLux wrote: Hmmm... are these just.....]

Notice there is not any shit or needles on the sidewalks or street? No heroin use out in the open? The city brings in porta potties, also most of the homeless are moved out of downtown business and tourist areas, and are given opportunities to move into homeless shelters for counseling and possible job opportunities.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The problem is Denver, LA, Portland, and Seattle are just about there too. We can probably add Chicago, Detroit, and NYC. Seems the Democrat agenda is to turn the US into a 3rd world country, with a smaller middle class and more heroin addicted, poor, and homeless.

Not hard to believe in large cities where a mortgage or rent is sky high, and so is crime and the homeless.

Joe in PB wrote:Notice San Diego isn't listed. We have a Republican Mayor who enforces law

Your mayor is a policeman?

Obviously you don't like me pointing out Democrat hypocrisy. Instead you remain silent, unfortunately you and many Democrats haven't figured out that silence is the same as agreement.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

I mostly skim your posts because you are an idiot. You found a hypocritical politician?!? Give yourself a cookie, corky.

The problem is you don't read anything I link, but always insist on commenting.

Nor am I the one who remains silent when Democrats go off the rails and decide its in the best interest of the party to not enforce illegal Immigration or illegal drug use, or defecation on our city streets and walkways. Even though those thing are not in the best interest of the country.

Obviously you would be much better off trying to limit your own idiocy.

Joe in PB wrote:The problem is you don't read anything I link, but always insist on commenting.

Nor am I the one who remains silent when Democrats go off the rails and decide its in the best interest of the party to not enforce illegal Immigration or illegal drug use, or defecation on our city streets and walkways. Even though those thing are not in the best interest of the country.

Obviously you would be much better off trying to limit your own idiocy.

Good god, you're a mess.



By the way, San Francisco is still the most beautiful place to live in the United States.


And the most expensive and highly educated... and it's not close.


Psst... its called "Supply and Demand" .







https://www.ranker.com/list/most-beauti ... ker-travel




m2 is the truth

Rack m2 for taking care of my light work.

Quite the pair you two make, dumb and dumber. One thinks a shit strewn city is beautiful because he's never actually there, the other is a Democratic sheep who believes the party is going to save his pension. Good luck with that logic the both of you.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

My pension is pretty damn secure, you babbling retard.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/ ... -policies/

A good read on SF by someone who has insight from the financial sector. He isn’t optimistic about Fiat’s favorite city.

https://www.foxnews.com/travel/san-fran ... ng-shelter

Now those bums and hobos are hanging out at the airport. It just keeps getting worse.

Unfortunately SF will have to become much, much worst before there will ever be any change. Kinda like a commuter who took a wrong turn in San Diego and ended up in Baja California, then drove all the way down to Cabo San Lucas before deciding to turn around.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

That’s how gentrification works you babbling retards.

I didn't realize that shit on the sidewalk was an integral part of the process of gentrification, Kierland. Next you're going to tell me that without hypo needles sticking people unawares on their feet nothing can ever get improved. Huh. Whooda thunk it?

Queerland and Flatsux are part of the problem, not the solution. First you have to admit there is a problem, then change policies to fix it. Neither of those dimwits, nor the Democratic super majority seem able to do that......

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Rooster wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:28 pm I didn't realize that shit on the sidewalk was an integral part of the process of gentrification, Kierland. Next you're going to tell me that without hypo needles sticking people unawares on their feet nothing can ever get improved. Huh. Whooda thunk it?

Anybody that knows anything.

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:42 pm Queerland and Flatsux are part of the problem, not the solution. First you have to admit there is a problem, then change policies to fix it. Neither of those dimwits, nor the Democratic super majority seem able to do that......

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The problem is income inequality. First you have to admit there is a problem...

Thanks for confirming my take.

The real problem is an over abundance of drug addicts homesteading in downtown SF. Last I checked passed out in a tent or on the street produces no income.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Just about every city in the US has a homeless problem to some degree. If you find the right area you can take some pretty disturbing pictures.
The West Coast just happens to be blessed with weather that won't kill you if you sleep outdoors most of the year.

This is just a few blocks from Petco Park, BTW.

This is Macon, GA.

Salt Lake City

So for Democrats this is not a problem. Yet in the CODEC thread we see Providence RI doesn't have this issue because they enforce the law and send addicts to treatment centers.

But, but looky over there......

.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Baltimore

San Antonio

Where's Fallbrook?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:43 pm So for Democrats this is not a problem. Yet in the CODEC thread we see Providence RI doesn't have this issue because they enforce the law and send addicts to treatment centers.

But, but looky over there......

Sent from my rectum using Trumpatalk

Sure, no problem at all in Providence.

Old photos? The CODEC solution has only been around 2-3 years.

Like I said this is not a problem that can be fixed until people decide it's a problem, and that is not the case now.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:52 pm Where's Fallbrook?

Sent from my rectum using Trumpatalk

Like I said, son. The problem exists everywhere.

You sure are good at completely missing the point. I'd say about a 100% success rate.


These are about the worst pictures I could find for Fallbrook.





There are plenty for Oceanslime, Escondildo and Temecula though.

So Mikey agrees what is being done now isn't a solution. That is progress.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:06 pm So Mikey agrees what is being done now isn't a solution.

Who ever said that it was...besides your claim that there's no problem in Providence?

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:57 pm Old photos?

LOL

April 16, 2019

Stabbing victim speaks out about homelessness crisis in Providence

http://www.abc6.com/story/40316074/stab ... providence

March 21, 2019

Study: RI has more homeless students than state has identified

PROVIDENCE, R.I (WPRI) — Rhode Island's homeless student population may be higher than previously estimated, according to a new report.

https://www.wpri.com/news/education/stu ... 1866920009



I guess that CODEC is just working fucking wonders. Because it's no longer a problem in Providence.