T1B

She's right

She's also not the president

Stop trying to distract from this shit rolling downhill organized crime syndicate operating out of the White House.

trots

Agreed she isn’t t President but the fact Screwy can’t see the irony here is so telling.

No that you think it’s irony is what’s telling. It’s telling me you are a fat red retard.

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 3:53 amReally kind of shocked at the pillowhead, but then again - he's as much of a liberal as we thought.

Hitlery is trash, but there is no comparison between her Twitter feed and Dona'd Trump's.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:14 am Agreed she isn’t t President but the fact Screwy can’t see the irony here is so telling.

Republicans have been up her ass for more than 20 years and you have yet to charge her with a crime. Meanwhile the outright criminality of the Trump administration is in our faces every day.

Put up or shut up moron.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:15 pm
Put up or shut up moron.

So the same doesn’t apply to Dems and Trump? Typical Liberal double standard.

Wtf are you babbling on about now fatty?

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:51 pm So the same doesn’t apply to Dems and Trump? Typical Liberal double standard.

Lol, you live in a fantasy world.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 1:55 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:51 pm So the same doesn’t apply to Dems and Trump? Typical Liberal double standard.

Lol, you live in a fantasy world.

You out of anyone would know best. Well besides Softball.

The Mueller Report provided overwhelming evidence of pervasive Trump Administration criminality and corruption. You on the other hand don't have jack shit on Killary other what you've heard in conservative media.

Put up or shut up indeed.

If it did he would have been indicted. What it did show was authorization by Obama for the FBI to spy on the Trump campaign.

It doesn't matter that the Muller report didn't exonerate Trump, that's not what prosecutors do, they either indict, or they don't.

End of story

In addition Muller's lack of evidence for Russian collusion was likely known before the 2018 elections.

I understand there was collusion though, between Muller and the Democratic party.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:52 pm If it did he would have been indicted. What it did show was authorization by Obama for the FBI to spy on the Trump campaign.

It doesn't matter that the Muller report didn't exonerate Trump, that's not what prosecutors do, they either indict, or they don't.

End of story

In addition Muller's lack of evidence for Russian collusion was likely known before the 2018 elections.

I understand there was collusion though, between Muller and the Democratic party.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Mueller wasn't allowed to make a determination of criminality. DOJ also doesn't indict sitting presidents. Anything else that you are utterly clueless about that you need to be educated on? Fucking moron. Post some more whackjob fake news conspiracy theory stories.

I'll leave the fake news to you since you're the one with the PHD in fake news. So you're saying Muller couldn't say their was enough evidence of collution to indict Trump if he wasn't president?

Didn't think so.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:44 pm I'll leave the fake news to you since you're the one with the PHD in fake news.

IKYABWAI'ing tard. Get bent.

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:44 pm I'll leave the fake news to you since you're the one with the PHD in fake news. So you're saying Muller couldn't say their was enough evidence of collution to indict Trump if he wasn't president?

Didn't think so.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Hey dipshit, you literally linked to fake news and then just sluffed it off like it was nothing. Fucking lying red tards.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:31 pm The Mueller Report provided overwhelming evidence of pervasive Trump Administration criminality and corruption. You on the other hand don't have jack shit on Killary other what you've heard in conservative media.

Put up or shut up indeed.

Never mind the Obama DOJ declining to bring charges against her.

Keep running your double standard.

Kierland wrote:
Hey dipshit, you literally linked to fake news and then just sluffed it off like it was nothing. Fucking lying red tards.

Nice white flag.

When do you ever provide proof on any debate?

Never.

Instead you submit a crying tirade of a 3rd grader.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:03 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:31 pm The Mueller Report provided overwhelming evidence of pervasive Trump Administration criminality and corruption. You on the other hand don't have jack shit on Killary other what you've heard in conservative media.

Put up or shut up indeed.

Never mind the Obama DOJ declining to bring charges against her.

Keep running your double standard.

Don the Con could have.

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:35 pm

Kierland wrote:
Hey dipshit, you literally linked to fake news and then just sluffed it off like it was nothing. Fucking lying red tards.

Nice white flag.

When do you ever provide proof on any debate?

Never.

Instead you submit a crying tirade of a 3rd grader.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Learn the lingo. It’s not a white flag because I stated my reason why your post sucked and I have always provided proof when asked so stop lying you lying lying liar.

Muller was the special consel and he could have stated that there is evidence for collusion if Trump wasn't a sitting president. Your response of fake news is called waving the white flag. Something you do often on this board.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:03 pm Never mind the Obama DOJ declining to bring charges against her.

Keep running your double standard.

Well what are you waiting for? Charge her.

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:08 pm Muller was the special consel and he could have stated that there is evidence for collusion if Trump wasn't a sitting president. Your response of fake news is called waving the white flag. Something you do often on this board.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Once again, not a white flag because I addressed the topic. I said you are a tard for posting fake news, literal fake news, and then complaining about fake news. Trump won because tards can vote. God god.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:33 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:03 pm Never mind the Obama DOJ declining to bring charges against her.

Keep running your double standard.

Well what are you waiting for? Charge her.

And if Trump is as bad as you claim. Charge him. Have NY or CA do it?

The US Atty for the Southern District of NY is the furthest non federal prosecutor up Trump's ass. Haven't you been paying attention?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:39 pm The US Atty for the Southern District of NY is the furthest non federal prosecutor up Trump's ass. Haven't you been paying attention?

And where are the charges?

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:04 am And where are the charges?

Trust me, I'd prefer them sooner than later.

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:52 pmIt doesn't matter that the Muller report didn't exonerate Trump, that's not what prosecutors do, they either indict, or they don't.

End of story

As Mueller explained, indicting the sitting president was not an option because of DOJ policy.
He further explained that Donald can be indicted when he is no longer president and/or Congress can do something about the issue before Don leaves office.
He compiled the evidence and he did his job.

Joe wrote:So you're saying Muller couldn't say their was enough evidence of collution to indict Trump if he wasn't president?

He did not need to say that, however he did say that if he could have cleared Donald of obstruction, he would have.






Dropped on your head as an infant?

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:04 am

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:39 pm The US Atty for the Southern District of NY is the furthest non federal prosecutor up Trump's ass. Haven't you been paying attention?

And where are the charges?

Where is your brain?

Joe in PB wrote: ↑Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:52 pmIn addition Muller's lack of evidence for Russian collusion was likely known before the...

In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” ... The Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined m federal law. In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign “coordinat[ed]” — a term that appears in the appointment order — with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion, ‘coordination’ does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement — tacit or express — between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.”

- Mueller Report








You are a pinhead.