T1B

In the Pentagon, if you give yourself or your company or a friend a no-bid contract, you go to prison.

Trump did just exactly that by choosing to host the G-7 at his failing Doral "resort." Doral, in WPB, in July. Sounds like a blast.

Of course, nothing will be done to him because GOP tards think this is just perfectly fine behavior.

"WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE????" Suckaholic cries....

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:57 pm In the Pentagon, if you give yourself or your company or a friend a no-bid contract, you go to prison.

Trump did just exactly that by choosing to host the G-7 at his failing Doral "resort." Doral, in WPB, in July. Sounds like a blast.

Of course, nothing will be done to him because GOP tards think this is just perfectly fine behavior.

"WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE????" Suckaholic cries....

L -- O --S -- E -- R !

You really are a stupid fuck.

Both of you.

Carson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:24 pm You really are a stupid fuck.

Both of you.

What’s wrong with the lead post?

Ban Kierfag wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 3:04 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:57 pm In the Pentagon, if you give yourself or your company or a friend a no-bid contract, you go to prison.

Trump did just exactly that by choosing to host the G-7 at his failing Doral "resort." Doral, in WPB, in July. Sounds like a blast.

Of course, nothing will be done to him because GOP tards think this is just perfectly fine behavior.

"WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE????" Suckaholic cries....

L -- O --S -- E -- R !

Great plan 88crickets.
You vile jackbooted thug.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:20 pm
Great plan 88crickets.
You vile jackbooted thug.

I am now beginning to piece together the meta narrative you are weaving.

I tip my yarmulke to you, good sir.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 6:19 pm What’s wrong with the lead post?

His boy is the most corrupt man in the nation, that's what's wrong.

There are government contract which require a bid process. If he by-passed it, he would be breaking the law. Other contracts do not follow this rule.

Not sure you'd want an international conference to go to the lowest bidder.

Does this look bad, politically?

I suppose it does but at this point Trump simply doesn't give a fukk about that. He knows that those that hate him will continue to, no matter what. He's doing this just to stick his finger in their eye.

If there is a government agency in charge of squashing any possible emolument violation, they should step forward now and shut this down. If not, then STFU and get on with planning the event.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 11:10 pm If there is a government agency in charge of squashing any possible emolument violation, they should step forward now and shut this down. If not, then STFU and get on with planning the event.

Lol, yeah I'm sure Trump would play along.

He wouldn't have much choice. If it is a federal law stating it must go to bid, it would.

But there isn't.

The emolument's clause was written for things like being paid an unexplainable amount to do something you have no qualifications for.

Trump says this will be done at cost. No other resort would agree to do that. It will be easy enough to see if that is the case

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 11:38 pm He wouldn't have much choice. If it is a federal law stating it must go to bid, it would.

But there isn't.

The emolument's clause was written for things like being paid an unexplainable amount to do something you have no qualifications for.

Trump says this will be done at cost. No other resort would agree to do that. It will be easy enough to see if that is the case

Hello, moron. Trump wipes his ass with laws.

"At cost." Lol

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 1:07 am Hello, moron. Trump wipes his ass with laws.

Got any specific examples?

Real concrete ones, not the vague generalizations you've been spouting for 3 years.

His violation of 58USC30121 you orange dick sucking moron.

smackaholic wrote:He's doing this just to stick his finger in their eye.

He makes decisions based on warped personal motivations.

He needs to follow Nixon's lead and -----> GTFO.

Good to see Trump saw the light and decided to not host the G-7 at Doral. Too bad Suckaholic put on his Trump lipstick and kneepads before assuming the position.

I thought I was doing something very good for our Country by using Trump National Doral, in Miami, for hosting the G-7 Leaders...

- Donald






Suckaholic said he was doing it to stick it to his detractors.

He was for the G7 being at Doral, then he was against it.

I wonder what Dan Vogel would think of the president using the Oval Office to enrich his family?

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 1:55 am His violation of 58USC30121 you orange dick sucking moron.

Go fukkk yourself, you FASCIST ANTIFA AMERICA HATING NAZI 666

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:59 am I wonder what Dan Vogel would think of the president using the Oval Office to enrich his family?

They were already BILLIONAIRES, YOU FLAT EARTH FAGGOT!

Ban Kierfag wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:41 am

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 1:55 am His violation of 58USC30121 you orange dick sucking moron.

Go fukkk yourself, you FASCIST ANTIFA AMERICA HATING NAZI 666

^^88hacks typically legal analysis.

Ban Kierfag wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:42 am

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:59 am I wonder what Dan Vogel would think of the president using the Oval Office to enrich his family?

They were already BILLIONAIRES, YOU FLAT EARTH FAGGOT!

Figure out who you are talking to, stooge.






#101

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:57 pm
at his failing Doral "resort."

Link?

You're right, calling Doral a "resort" is a stretch. It's a giant pile of shit.

But for reals, read a legitimate news outlet for once.

The Washington Post, for starters.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 2:57 pm In the Pentagon, if you give yourself or your company or a friend a no-bid contract, you go to prison.

Trump did just exactly that by choosing to host the G-7 at his failing Doral "resort." Doral, in WPB, in July. Sounds like a blast.

Of course, nothing will be done to him because GOP tards think this is just perfectly fine behavior.

"WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE????" Suckaholic cries....

Has anyone important ever really gone to prison for it?

He shouldn't host it at a resort he owns. That's a clear ethics violation.

But Epstein and Maxwell both escaped justice, and Buck was allowed to continue to intentionally hurt and kill black men. Ethics are funny that way.

Who exactly are the Democrats putting up to counter Trump, who is more virtuous?

Annie logic--Trump hasn't done anything wrong because the Dems don't have anyone "more virtuous" than Trump.

And yes, important people have gone to prison for procurement fraud.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:59 am I wonder what Dan Vogel would think of the president using the Oval Office to enrich his family?

Danny boy is probably too busy making sure Floyd the Barber doesn't get too fat gorging on his blossoming edibles business to care what Trump does.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:09 pm Annie logic--Trump hasn't done anything wrong because the Dems don't have anyone "more virtuous" than Trump.

And yes, important people have gone to prison for procurement fraud.

Hi S_M. No, it's a clear ethics violation. But it's hard to care about a choice of venue, when a one wealthy Democratic donor was allowed to rape 12 year old 'models' from poor families, while another wealthy Democratic donor was allowed to drug, sexually molest and/or murder multiple black men. Not all ethics violations are the same.

Show me Trump destroying lives for personal (and/or sexual) gratification.

And no, the Kurds don't count, because they are not the first ethnic people to be used as proxies by our government, then abandoned. There are three continents (four) to choose from on that front.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 6:43 pm The Washington Post, for starters.

Your bias is duly noted for pointing out a liberal leaning fish wrap. A paper that has never endorsed a GOP Presidential candidate, ran knowingly false into on high school students, etc.

No thanks. I will stick with the Wall Street Journal.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 8:09 pm No thanks. I will stick with the Wall Street Journal.

Baby steps...

Hardly.

The WSJ has a neutral bias rating unlike most of the other US papers. But you are a racist snowflake jizz mopped so we expect your bias and wanting to read biased work.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:03 am Hardly.

The WSJ has a neutral bias rating unlike most of the other US papers. But you are a racist snowflake jizz mopped so we expect your bias and wanting to read biased work.

I actually subscribe to both jizz mopping outlets. How does that taste?

Looking for facts for your own work?

Honestly it seems unnecessary. But hey you do you. I guess you can use the WaPo to get your liberal posting points for here eh?

Left Seater wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:05 am Looking for facts for your own work?

Honestly it seems unnecessary. But hey you do you. I guess you can use the WaPo to get your liberal posting points for here eh?

Like most things, you seem woefully ignorant about how jizz mopping is actually performed. Why don't you stick to whining about Her's medical records. Because she's not living in your dome or anything.

A couple of mentions this week and that is living in a dome? Ok.

If anyone would know the definition it would be you what with Trump taking up all your dome space.


And if jizz mopping today is reading others work and reacting to it you make my case for the continued decline of the profession. Newsmen from the decades gone by are rolling in their graves at what passes for journalists today.

So until WSJ covers the subject it’s not true.
Who is the snowflake now you fat greedy nazi fuck?

Left Seater and Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:12 am ...some shit which could wait...

... n.i.gg.as, it's Sunday. Mr. Robot is on. Relax for an hour.

Screwed in the Ass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:03 am


I actually subscribe to both jizz mopping outlets. How does that taste?

Closest you have came to citing a source of any of your shit allegations in years. But explains where your slanted takes come from.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:09 am And if jizz mopping today is reading others work and reacting to it you make my case for the continued decline of the profession. Newsmen from the decades gone by are rolling in their graves at what passes for journalists today.

Keep clowning yourself, moron. Btw, how's that shouldn't-be-grounded 737 Max coming along? I mean talk about being wrong about the one thing to be right on. But that's your track record so we shouldn't be surprised.