T1B

Posted: **Sat Nov 09, 2019 5:52 pm**

If you can power your civilisation on cheap, abundant, renewable and safe sources of energy...that aren't reliant on other countries and governments...

...why wouldn't you?

If you think YouTube "rolling coal" videos are funny...
...kill yourself.

If you think articles attacking Greta Thunenberg are "edgy"...
...kill yourself.

If you throw trash out of your moving vehicle on the highway because "Take that LIB-TARDS!"...
...kill yourself.

...or just post at .net

:|

Posted: **Sat Nov 09, 2019 6:34 pm**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2019 5:52 pm If you can power your civilisation on cheap, abundant, renewable and safe sources of energy...that aren't reliant on other countries and governments...

...why wouldn't you?

If you think YouTube "rolling coal" videos are funny...
...kill yourself.

If you think articles attacking Greta Thunenberg are "edgy"...
...kill yourself.

If you throw trash out of your moving vehicle on the highway because "Take that LIB-TARDS!"...
...kill yourself.

...or just post at .net

:|

If you don't understand that we are simply "dust in the wind"
Kill yourself.

If you don't understand that our planet is currently in-between "ice ages".
Kill yourself.

You sound like a brainwashed sheep who doesn't wipe his ass.

Posted: **Sat Nov 09, 2019 9:34 pm**

Flood the zone.
Lots of echo chamber chatter.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88PiecesOfShit

Posted: **Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:16 pm**

Because oil and coal are clean and will last forever.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:41 pm**

Natural gas is clean and abundant. But a Democrat pushed us away from it and now we burn it off at the well source in many cases because we have an oversupply.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:48 pm**

Who is we?

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:53 pm**

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:41 pm Natural gas is clean and abundant.

Fracking isn't.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:41 pm ...we burn it off at the well source in many cases because we have an oversupply.

"oversupply" is not the reason it gets burned off...

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:55 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:48 pmWho is we?

Who is we?
Who is we sucka?

You wanna find out?

Just go to YouTube and cue up the diner scene from the Clint Eastwood movie "sudden impact".
You'll find out who "we" is sucka.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:00 pm**

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:41 pm Natural gas is clean and abundant. But a Democrat pushed us away from it and now we burn it off at the well source in many cases because we have an oversupply.

Natural gas is not “clean.” It’s cleaner than coal or oil but definitely not clean. A useful bridge between the dirtier alternatives and 100% renewable (or close to 100%, I don’t think 100% will ever be feasible). But a temporary bridge.

Also if there’s an oversupply, as you claim, then why do we need to keep fracking for more? Fracking itself is highly polluting and water intensive. Shouldn’t there be some concern about the many areas that don’t have an adequate supply of clean drinking water?

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:04 pm**

88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:51 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:16 pm Because oil and coal are clean and will last forever.
Because the alternatives are developed and ready and it is a cabal of greedy fucks who are preventing implementation worldwide.

Glad to see you’re finally willing to acknowledge the truth.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:06 pm**

Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:00 pm Shouldn’t there be some concern about the many areas that don’t have an adequate supply of clean drinking water?

They should "pull themselves up by their own bootstraps" and put their faith in the market economy.

Put your "capitalism" in a long tube and pour contaminated water through that to remove pollutants.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:13 pm**

I think you’re being facetious.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:19 pm**

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:20 pm**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: "oversupply" is not the reason it gets burned off...

Right. Because producers would rather waste a resource that they could otherwise sell.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:39 pm**

They don’t burn off natural gas from natural gas wells. That really would be stupid, even in Texas.

:doh:

They burn it off from oil wells because it’s a byproduct of pumping oil, they’re not there to produce gas (it’s not economical to capture the small volumes of gas produced) and, in most cases, it’s illegal to vent it without burning it off.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:44 pm**

Seater's feelings don't care about your facts.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:03 pm**

I didn’t say they flared it from Natural gas wells. They do flare it from oil wells because it isn’t oil. If we used more of it they would capture it and sell it. The process to capture and produce it is done in a number of places. We don’t do it more because the market doesn’t support it. Hence oversupply.

And sure it isn’t Mikey’s magic shade tree clean, but then again the production of his shade tree and battery isn’t super clean either. But it is clean enough to burn in most of our homes on our stove.

Posted: **Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:31 pm**

88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:51 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:16 pm Because oil and coal are clean and will last forever.
Because the alternatives are developed and ready and it is a cabal of greedy fucks who are preventing implementation worldwide.

That and assholes like you who would rather burn a gallon of gas than plug in a solar panel.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:38 am**

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:31 pm
88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:51 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:16 pm Because oil and coal are clean and will last forever.
Because the alternatives are developed and ready and it is a cabal of greedy fucks who are preventing implementation worldwide.
That and assholes like you who would rather burn a gallon of gas than plug in a solar panel.

Are you clinically dumb?
The planet is currently in-between ice ages.
Do you understand how violent and extreme the climate gets as we near the next Ice age?
You are clueless about this science because you're a sheep.

You gotta love the left wing crazies talking about the recent storms and hurricanes, when on a planet that's 5 billion years old, the next ice age is just around the corner.

Bobby Jones, was one of the all time golf greats.
When he saw the "golden bear" Jack Nicklaus play for the first time, he remarked, "You play a game of which I am unfamiliar".

Kierland.
I discuss matters and subjects of which you are not familiar.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:40 am**

Then go suck a tail pipe if you love gas so much.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 4:43 am**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:44 pm Seater's feelings don't care about your facts.

That muppet looks exactly like Dr. Phil.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:18 pm**

88 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 6:38 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 5:04 pm
88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:51 pm

Because the alternatives are developed and ready and it is a cabal of greedy fucks who are preventing implementation worldwide.
Glad to see you’re finally willing to acknowledge the truth.
Who are the members of the cabal? And why haven’t places like California overcome their evil ways?

Holy cow!
After reading 88's takes. My posts are cheap fodder in comparison.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:39 pm**

schmick wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:32 pm If you support the little autistic antifa retard from Sweden protesting in western countries when it's Asian and African countries that are polluting the world....... kill your family first, then kill yourself

It would take kierland the rest of his natural life along with the lives of a thousand other low IQ leftists, to come close to the brilliance of this one take.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:52 pm**

Spin spin spin.
Don’t believe your lying eyes.
Oil is good.
Suck more tailpipes.
Greed is good.

Sin,
88coalrollers

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:40 pm**

EAP wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:18 pm Holy cow!
After reading 88's takes. My posts are cheap fodder in comparison.

After cleaning our cats’ litter box your posts are cheap fodder in comparison.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:59 pm**

EAP wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:39 pm
schmick wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:32 pm If you support the little autistic antifa retard from Sweden protesting in western countries when it's Asian and African countries that are polluting the world....... kill your family first, then kill yourself
It would take kierland the rest of his natural life along with the lives of a thousand other low IQ leftists, to come close to the brilliance of this one take.

First Duhron is a Mensa, now Shedick is Brilliant.
You only pimp the best people right?

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:01 pm**

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:40 pm After cleaning our cats’ litter box your posts are cheap fodder in comparison.

Is your cat a Reagan Cat...that loves it's country...and cherishes the Constitution?

...or is it one of those leftist, socialist cats?

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:02 pm**

"To the gulag with you, Fido!"

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:17 pm**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:01 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:40 pm After cleaning our cats’ litter box your posts are cheap fodder in comparison.
Is your cat a Reagan Cat...that loves it's country...and cherishes the Constitution?

...or is it one of those leftist, socialist cats?

Mines a russian blue.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:22 pm**

EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2019 6:34 pm
If you don't understand that we are simply "dust in the wind"
Kill yourself.

If you don't understand that our planet is currently in-between "ice ages".
Kill yourself.

I have to agree with the EAP kid on this one. Earth will take care of herself. Nothing we do matters, except to breed -- as Tarkus used to argue repeatedly.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:24 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:59 pm
EAP wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:39 pm
schmick wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:32 pm If you support the little autistic antifa retard from Sweden protesting in western countries when it's Asian and African countries that are polluting the world....... kill your family first, then kill yourself
It would take kierland the rest of his natural life along with the lives of a thousand other low IQ leftists, to come close to the brilliance of this one take.
First Duhron is a Mensa, now Shedick is Brilliant.
You only pimp the best people right?

Except it's true. Why focus on the First world, and not China?

She can see CO2, Beijing must be pitch black. That little girl is being abused.

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:28 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:31 pm
88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 10, 2019 3:51 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:16 pm Because oil and coal are clean and will last forever.
Because the alternatives are developed and ready and it is a cabal of greedy fucks who are preventing implementation worldwide.
That and assholes like you who would rather burn a gallon of gas than plug in a solar panel.

What happened to the experimental French solar panel highway, btw? What would need to happen to make it feasible instead of a failure?

Posted: **Mon Nov 11, 2019 11:21 pm**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:28 pm [What happened to the experimental French solar panel highway, btw? What would need to happen to make it feasible instead of a failure?

Basically, it was a stupid idea. Anybody with half a functioning brain would have realized that before they even considered building it.

If you want to cover a road with solar panels, not such a bad idea itself because roads take up a lot of space, put them on a canopy over the road. Not on the ground where people will be driving on them.

:doh:

The more I think about this the harder it is to believe that someone would actually do anything that stupid and think it would work.

A lot of schools and businesses with large parking lots are putting solar canopies over the parking areas. That’s an excellent application because you can put all that space to good use, they’re relatively easy to build and people like having a shaded place to park.

Posted: **Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:37 am**

Smith & Wesson has recently put most of their very large employee parking lot under solar panel canopies. I am sure this conflicts the hell out of libtard. A merchant of death trying to save the planet.

I suspect it simplifies snow cleanup as well, assuming they get it before it blows all over the place.

I would also think that asphalt life might be extended if it doesn't have the sun beating on it as much.

I will probably be going there tomorrow. We sold them an x-ray they use to scan all incoming repair jobs. You'd be amazed how many idiots send their firearms in will lead in them. Kinda stands out a bit on an xray.

Posted: **Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:42 am**

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 11:21 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2019 9:28 pm [What happened to the experimental French solar panel highway, btw? What would need to happen to make it feasible instead of a failure?
Basically, it was a stupid idea. Anybody with half a functioning brain would have realized that before they even considered building it.

If you want to cover a road with solar panels, not such a bad idea itself because roads take up a lot of space, put them on a canopy over the road. Not on the ground where people will be driving on them. :doh:

The more I think about this the harder it is to believe that someone would actually do anything that stupid and think it would work.

A lot of schools and businesses with large parking lots are putting solar canopies over the parking areas. That’s an excellent application because you can put all that space to good use, they’re relatively easy to build and people like having a shaded place to park.

I have always thought that solar canopies over road bridges would be a good idea. Not like we haven't done it in the past. Of course that was because the bridges were made out of shit that rots when it gets wet. I ran the idea past a friend who is a bridge structural engineer and he said it would never be feasible as the wind loads would require the bridges to be ridiculously overbuilt.

Posted: **Tue Nov 12, 2019 1:17 am**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 12:37 am
I suspect it simplifies snow cleanup as well, assuming they get it before it blows all over the place.

I would also think that asphalt life might be extended if it doesn't have the sun beating on it as much.

Less sun baking for your car and it’s contents, I can keep my phone in the car without it going to over heat mode. Keeps the urban heat down as well. They are all over Cali.

T1B

Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources

Re: Conservatism, The Environment and renewable resources