Red alert for Mgo, Marty

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21096
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Red alert for Mgo, Marty

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Better save those epic YouTube videos you made, unless you are making money on them.

https://www.techspot.com/news/82711-you ... iable.html
YouTube can now delete accounts that aren't "commercially viable"

WTF?! Considering starting a YouTube channel? Maybe you already have one and are trying to add to your subscriber base. If so, here’s some potentially worrying news: The video platform says it can now ban users it deems “no longer commercially viable.”
The strange rule appeared in YouTube’s new terms of service, which it emailed to users over the weekend. It appears in the “Account Suspension & Termination” section under the “Terminations by YouTube for Service Changes” subheader.

The exact wording of the new terms, set to come into effect in the US on December 10, reads: “YouTube may terminate your access, or your Google account’s access to all or part of the Service if YouTube believes, in its sole discretion, that provision of the Service to you is no longer commercially viable.”

The changes to the ToS are supposed to make them “clearer and easier to understand,” yet they’ve had the opposite effect for most people.

YouTube’s ability to delete accounts just because they’re not profitable enough is obviously worrying a lot of creators. As noted by Gadgets 360, one Twitter user, @RageGoldenEagle, notes that these terms have been in effect in the European Economic Area (EEA) and Switzerland since July 22.

YouTube claims that it’s “not changing.” A spokesperson said: “We're making some changes to our Terms of Service in order to make them easier to read and to ensure they're up to date. We're not changing the way our products work, how we collect or process data, or any of your settings.”

The terms could be a way for YouTube to remove channels that promote hate speech, conspiracy theories, or harmful messages whose content isn’t extreme enough to warrant an outright ban, as these are unlikely to be commercially viable. But if this is the case, it needs to be clearly explained.

You can read more about the updated terms and conditions on this lengthy Reddit thread.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Red alert for Mgo, Marty

Post by Innocent Bystander »

it's not intended for small fry. it's intended for the controversial. you can still view your mommy milkers non-porn porn. having an opinion advertisers deem problematic is a different story.

it won't kill youtube like the banning of sex killed livejournal; content providers can choose to castrate themselves like pewdiepie or be defiantly deplatformed like alex jones.

Tiananmen square videos will be the true canary in the coal mine.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Red alert for Mgo, Marty

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

I don't understand YouTubers that cry about losing their entire life's work...

I mean YouTube is run by shady, suspicious motherfuckers, but how retarded do you have to be to not keep a local copy?
Seriously, that's their complaint...the only edition of their work that exists is the one they've posted on YouTube...
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Post Reply