Page 1 of 1

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:55 pm
by Left Seater
That’s spot on and would be funny if it wasn’t true.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:06 pm
by Kierland
If the refs have a helmet than I should get one too.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:29 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
"You can have my helmet when you pry it off my big dumb fat head..."


Oh...wait...

:doh:

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:10 pm
by Left Seater
We need helmet free zones immediately! Or at least safe rooms where triggered snowflakes can escape the threat of helmets.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:11 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Left Seater wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:10 pm We need helmet free zones immediately! Or at least safe rooms where triggered snowflakes can escape the threat of helmets.
ok boomer

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:13 pm
by Left Seater
Wrong generation.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:22 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
ok fatso

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:37 pm
by BSmack
Or you could actually mandate that chin straps not break off just because somebody's pulling on the helmet. That would be somewhat simple. Since helmets are replaced constantly you're not adding much extra cost to a multi billion dollar industry that really cares about player safety.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:40 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
BSmack wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:37 pm Or you could actually mandate that chin straps not break off just because somebody's pulling on the helmet.
The break off for a reason. What you're proposing is potentially lethal.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:59 pm
by BSmack
Makes as much sense as the rest of this thread. Maybe we devise a HANS system like NASCAR drivers. That way all the NFL players look like they're the freaking Hunchback in 300.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:05 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
BSmack wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:59 pm Maybe we devise a HANS system like NASCAR drivers.
That kind of already exists...it's called a "neck roll", but many players either don't wear one or wear a diminished version of one, as it's not league mandated...and players claim it restricts mobility.

It's a rough game. That is all.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 7:28 pm
by Dr_Phibes
They should make the helmets vibrate. After you get hit, headaches and a stiff neck would be a thing of the past.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:13 pm
by smackaholic
Left Seater wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:13 pm Wrong generation.
I was gonna say the same. I barely make the cutoff for "boomer" and I believe i have close to a decade on you.

What is the "boomer" range? I think it is 45-65 dob.

What is next? gen X, I think.

I have been noticing recently that "boomer" seems to be the favorite slur these days used by thirty somethings to tell those over 50 to STFU.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:14 pm
by BSmack
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
BSmack wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:59 pm Maybe we devise a HANS system like NASCAR drivers.
That kind of already exists...it's called a "neck roll", but many players either don't wear one or wear a diminished version of one, as it's not league mandated...and players claim it restricts mobility.

It's a rough game. That is all.
I remember neck rolls from the 1980s. The bigger the neck roll the more likely you were to be playing middle linebacker.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:34 pm
by smackaholic
Kind of silly that they are still using 50 year old helmet technology.

The answer seems simple. Make a thin outer shell with some sort of dampening between it and the inner helmet. It would be larger, but not much heavier. And when used as a club, it would be less effective.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:51 pm
by Innocent Bystander
Papa Willie wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:48 am Image
There's a Dr. Stephen Cito, DDS, reset in there, somewhere. Damed if I can find it.

There's also probably a knife version out there for Muslims and the EU. Anyway, rack you, Papa.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:45 pm
by mvscal
Papa Willie wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:31 pm
smackaholic wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 10:34 pm Kind of silly that they are still using 50 year old helmet technology.

The answer seems simple. Make a thin outer shell with some sort of dampening between it and the inner helmet. It would be larger, but not much heavier. And when used as a club, it would be less effective.
Image

Like that^^^^.

I remember discussing this with my father when I was 11 years old (1975) after some player had gotten a concussion in a game we were watching. Obviously - two soft surfaces hitting each other are subfuckingstantially going to reduce the chances of getting a concussion.

One reason I have no respect for the players who cry about later-in-life brain problems, is because the players have HAD the option to wear padding on the outside (like in the picture above), but don't because as so many put it "It looks stupid"...

Well - there you are.
It's impossible to stop concussions with helmets of any kind. It's a simple matter of physics. If you are moving forward and then your forward progress is instantly stopped, you brain is going to slosh around in your skull. There are no Star Trek inertial dampener helmets available.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:53 am
by Derron
smackaholic wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:13 pm
Left Seater wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:13 pm Wrong generation.
I was gonna say the same. I barely make the cutoff for "boomer" and I believe i have close to a decade on you.

What is the "boomer" range? I think it is 45-65 dob.

What is next? gen X, I think.

I have been noticing recently that "boomer" seems to be the favorite slur these days used by thirty somethings to tell those over 50 to STFU.
Millennials are 1981 to 1996

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials

Gen X is mid 1960's to mid 1980's per wiki. Little bit of over lap there I would say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X

Millennials love using the term boomer when complaining about their inability to have a decent job, saying the boomers have fucked up the economy for them. Fucking pussys have more assets, better jobs and living situations than most of us did at that age.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:08 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
The generation of self-centered avarice that left nothing for it's children and grandchildren except debt and a mop to clean up after their party.

Re: Gun perspective...

Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:15 am
by EAP
Derron wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:53 am
smackaholic wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:13 pm
Left Seater wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:13 pm Wrong generation.
I was gonna say the same. I barely make the cutoff for "boomer" and I believe i have close to a decade on you.

What is the "boomer" range? I think it is 45-65 dob.

What is next? gen X, I think.

I have been noticing recently that "boomer" seems to be the favorite slur these days used by thirty somethings to tell those over 50 to STFU.
Millennials are 1981 to 1996

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials

Gen X is mid 1960's to mid 1980's per wiki. Little bit of over lap there I would say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X

Millennials love using the term boomer when complaining about their inability to have a decent job, saying the boomers have fucked up the economy for them. Fucking pussys have more assets, better jobs and living situations than most of us did at that age.
Add to that barry's total reversal of JFK's "ask not what your country can do for you",
Plus his ramping up of entitlements of all kinds, and you've got a prescription for disaster which ultimately leads to 3rd world status real fast.

Those who truly understand history such as 88 and yours truly, see these manifestations with crystal clear clarity.