T1B

War, huh, yeah
What is it good for...








The Department of Defense took offensive actions in defense of our personnel and interests in Iraq...








It's at the doorstep.
Hope you're ready for this one.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:10 am War, huh, yeah
What is it good for...








The Department of Defense took offensive actions in defense of our personnel and interests in Iraq...








It's at the doorstep.
Hope you're ready for this one.

War is a part of the human condition, and as it turns out, a necessary and vital part indeed.

EAP wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:19 am

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:10 am War, huh, yeah
What is it good for...





Edwin Starr is no expert. He could give advice on pimps and ho's, but that's about it.




The Department of Defense took offensive actions in defense of our personnel and interests in Iraq...








It's at the doorstep.
Hope you're ready for this one.

War is a part of the human condition, and as it turns out, a necessary and vital part indeed.

John Kerry and barry the Chicago community street hustler appeased the rulers of Iran.
Iran laughed at kerry and barry.

Iran's goals of wiping Israel off the face of the earth, never changed barry boy and kerry the clown only gave them more money and resources.

You stupid sheep don't live in a reality based world.

EAP wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:19 am

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 9:10 am War, huh, yeah
What is it good for...








The Department of Defense took offensive actions in defense of our personnel and interests in Iraq...








It's at the doorstep.
Hope you're ready for this one.

War is a part of the human condition, and as it turns out, a necessary and vital part indeed.

Said no human ever.

Someone get Rolly Polly Mike Pompeo on a fukkin treadmill.

He's a FFR.

I thought Trump was getting us out of the Middle East, except to fellate Bibi and MBS.

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:47 pm I thought Trump was getting us out of the Middle East, except to fellate Bibi and MBS.

He is be patient.
By his 2nd term, we should be out of there.

EAP wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 6:55 pm

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2019 5:47 pm I thought Trump was getting us out of the Middle East, except to fellate Bibi and MBS.

He is be patient.

Nice use of our Nation’s shared common language, cabroncito.

By his 2nd term, he should be out of there.

We can only hope.

Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities.
They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year!

- Don

It is what it is.

Sin,
Russell Bufalino

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 2:39 am Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities.
They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year!

- Don

It's a foregone conclusion.

Insert Trump tweet from 2012 on how Obummer was going to start a war with Iran to goose his sagging poll numbers.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 1:37 pm Insert Trump tweet from 2012 on how Obummer was going to start a war with Iran to goose his sagging poll numbers.

Only we now know that obama gave billions back to Iran instead.
A country which openly expressed it's serious goal of completely annihilating Israel off the map.
How was Obama's deal with Iran even worth the paper it was written on?
Would you be able to make a good faith deal with someone who expresses a desire to kill your friend?
Of course not.
Yet nowhere in the Iran deal did they walk back their threats against Israel.
Meaning that there was no deal.
You've been duped.

It was the courts that decided the issues not 44, you know, law and order.

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:22 pm It was the courts that decided the issues not 44, you know, law and order.

I'm talking about the deal.
A deal was inked out with Iran,
Which we signed on to, in spite of the fact that the rulers of Iran never walked back their promise to destroy Israel off the face of the earth.

Obama was president when this deal was made.

So again.
How is there a legitimate deal with these terrorists, if their promise to destroy Israel wasn't walked back?

It's not rocket science.
Maybe to you it may well be.

Lie Cheat Steal
Say anything
Facts are what we say they are
Trust the process

Sin,
88nazis

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:34 pm Lie Cheat Steal
Say anything
Facts are what we say they are
Trust the process

Sin,
88nazis

Just as I suspected.
You are programmed by leftist propaganda, and cannot grasp anything outside of that realm.
Carry on.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 2:39 am Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities.
They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat. Happy New Year!

- Don

It's a foregone conclusion.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:01 pm Kerry and President Obama put the entire world in danger by pushing through their one-sided and extremely dangerous deal with Iran. We may all pay a heavy price for their lack of foresight.

Hall of fame post.

Hey--if it wasn't for the Korean War, or UN Police Action we'd have a world without Kias, Hyundais, LG products, etc.
Sadly the free world wimped out on finishing it so we have Rocket Man and his saber rattling.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2020 1:37 pm Insert Trump tweet from 2012 on how Obummer was going to start a war with Iran to goose his sagging poll numbers.

The real takeback being that should never have been on the table to joke about in the first place. But someone thinks it works.

Wolfman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:26 pm Hey--if it wasn't for the Korean War, or UN Police Action we'd have a world without Kias, Hyundais, LG products, etc.
Sadly the free world wimped out on finishing it so we have Rocket Man and his saber rattling.

That family exists because someone wants them to exist.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:36 pm

Wolfman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:26 pm Hey--if it wasn't for the Korean War, or UN Police Action we'd have a world without Kias, Hyundais, LG products, etc.
Sadly the free world wimped out on finishing it so we have Rocket Man and his saber rattling.

That family exists because someone wants them to exist.

China, of course. The obvious answer is a nuclear armed Taiwan.

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:46 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:36 pm

Wolfman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:26 pm Hey--if it wasn't for the Korean War, or UN Police Action we'd have a world without Kias, Hyundais, LG products, etc.
Sadly the free world wimped out on finishing it so we have Rocket Man and his saber rattling.

That family exists because someone wants them to exist.

China, of course. The obvious answer is a nuclear armed Taiwan.

Then why aren't we arming them?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:49 pm

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:46 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:36 pm

That family exists because someone wants them to exist.

China, of course. The obvious answer is a nuclear armed Taiwan.

Then why aren't we arming them?

Politics, of course. Trump is the first US President to personally contact the Taiwanese leader since 1979. He has, at least, put Taiwan on the board.

https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/us-militar ... nder-trump

Every profitable negotiation has a carrot and a stick. In our negotiations with China, a heavily armed Taiwan is the stick.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:01 pm Kerry and President Obama put the entire world in danger by pushing through their one-sided and extremely dangerous deal with Iran. We may all pay a heavy price for their lack of foresight.

Except nothing happened during that time. So you can talk shit, but the evidence says you are an idiot.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:00 pm

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:01 pm Kerry and President Obama put the entire world in danger by pushing through their one-sided and extremely dangerous deal with Iran. We may all pay a heavy price for their lack of foresight.

Except nothing happened during that time. So you can talk shit, but the evidence says you are an idiot.

Wrong again dipshit.
Kerry/Obama greatly appeased the radical Islamic mullahs by giving back billions and inking.a deal with terrorists who promised to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

ANY deal worth the paper it's written on, would CLEARLY have had those threats walked back.
Otherwise you don't have a deal in good faith.

If you don't understand what I just said, you are not only a low IQ individual, but a brainwashed sheep of the left as well.

That kind of appeasement, according to history, leads to emboldened and aggressive attacks.
Which it clearly has.

Your denial of this, makes you look really really stupid.

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:17 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:49 pm

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:46 pm

China, of course. The obvious answer is a nuclear armed Taiwan.

Then why aren't we arming them?

Politics, of course. Trump is the first US President to personally contact the Taiwanese leader since 1979. He has, at least, put Taiwan on the board.

https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/us-militar ... nder-trump

Every profitable negotiation has a carrot and a stick. In our negotiations with China, a heavily armed Taiwan is the stick.

So why aren't we? If we can assassinate an enemy on allied soil, what's taking so long arming Taiwan?

Obama was not going to ask for it while sucking on Chinese dong.

Dubya was too busy funding his crusade into Iraq.

The Clintons also suckled the Peking penis.

Oh.
And don't forget that Obama's personal friend and adviser is Valerie Jarrett of IRANIAN DESCENT.

She whispered in his big elephant ears every day,
"Appeasement".
Billions in hard cash back.in their accounts.
Aiding and abetting state sponsored terrorism around the world.

Evil eyed Iranian valerie Jarrett.
Aren't any of you guys intellectualy curious like I am?

It never occurred to any of you fine gentlemen, that evil eyed valerie Jarrett was of Iranian descent?
That she loved giving back billions in cash to her homeland.
Aiding and abetting future acts of state terrorism around the globe.

None of you? Am I the only one curious enough to understand these fine points?

Obama meddling in Israel's elections?

You guys need to research and study politics for decades like me.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:21 am

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:17 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:49 pm

Then why aren't we arming them?

Politics, of course. Trump is the first US President to personally contact the Taiwanese leader since 1979. He has, at least, put Taiwan on the board.

https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/us-militar ... nder-trump

Every profitable negotiation has a carrot and a stick. In our negotiations with China, a heavily armed Taiwan is the stick.

So why aren't we? If we can assassinate an enemy on allied soil, what's taking so long arming Taiwan?

First, Taiwan isn't exactly defenseless at the moment. They have a modern army. Second, it's a serious card to play. It's not something done lightly or casually. We are still negotiating with the Chinese.