T1B

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:02 am**

I went down some internet rabbit holes today and after a rousing discussion at a site where the patriots of this county talk about dealing with all these liberal pieces of shit, there is certain vernacular that is used and one that I found particularly interesting:

Soy Boy

Slang used to describe males who completely and utterly lack all necessary masculine qualities. This pathetic state is usually achieved by an over-indulgence of emasculating products and/or ideologies.

The origin of the term derives from the negative effects soy consumption has been proven to have on the male physique and libido.

The average soy boy is a feminist, nonathletic, has never been in a fight, will probably marry the first girl that has sex with him, and likely reduces all his arguments to labeling the opposition as "Nazis".

See also: cuck, beta/omega male, orbiter, kissless virgin, male feminist

This now brings the whole Nazi bullshit thing into a very clear perspective.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am**

No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:00 am**

88's from West Virginia, right ?

West Virginia prison cadets fired over Nazi salute

According to a report from the department, a member of staff expressed her concerns to Ms Byrd after receiving the photo.

Ms Byrd responded by saying there was nothing wrong with the picture, the report said.

She explained the caption by saying: "They do that because I'm a hard-ass like Hitler."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50956534

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:50 am**

Derron wrote:male feminist

There should be more male feminists. More pussy for me.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:40 pm**

Slap.
There's a huge difference between the pussy and the ass hole.
Has nothing to do with religion,
But hard scientific fact.
The pussy is meant to be warm and inviting.
The ass is an exit only orifice,
Designed to expel waste.

That's why gay sex is against science and the laws of nature.
So the "center piece" and consummation of any gay marriage, flies in the face of nature.

Putting religion aside, gay sex is wrong from a science standpoint.

It's not nice to fuck with mother nature and science, or they will select you for extinction.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:47 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.

88 will back me up on this.
For the millionth time, the nazis,
Like ALL fascists, were government control socialists.
Communism is also government control socialism. So fascists are right at home in either system.

What I just said is FACT.

Anything you say which goes against that, is pure bullshit.

Today, president trump gets called a nazi all the time on fake news media and press.
And millions of low IQ blue voters believe that shit.

The fact that you deny any of this, is priceless and proves that you're not firing on all cylinders.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:51 pm**

Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:02 am See also: cuck, beta/omega male, orbiter, kissless virgin, male feminist

This is the first time I've heard of these terms. Duhron must be very familiar with them. Do you get called these a lot, Duhron?

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm**

Soy Boy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.

You can prattle on all you want about your Nazi bullshit, it just proves what a whining little bitch you are. Independent sources confirm you affliction and you jump in right away to defend you tactic of calling everybody and anybody you do not agree with a Nazi. You suck Saul Alinskys dead cock all day long, and jump up and down screaming " You are a racist, you are a Nazi" as some kind of attempt to counter the ass plungerings you get here every day.

You are a tripe little midget mother fucker who has no smack, no intelligence and you are only good at repetitive, tedious and continual ankle biting taken from a smack playbook you could put on the head of a pin.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm**

Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm
Soy Boy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.
You can prattle on all you want about your Nazi bullshit, it just proves what a whining little bitch you are. Independent sources confirm your affliction and you jump in right away to defend you tactic of calling everybody and anybody you do not agree with a Nazi. You suck Saul Alinskys dead cock all day long, and jump up and down screaming " You are a racist, you are a Nazi" as some kind of attempt to counter the ass plungerings you get here every day.

You are a tripe little midget mother fucker who has no smack, no intelligence and you are only good at repetitive, tedious and continual ankle biting taken from a smack playbook you could put on the head of a pin.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 12:51 pm
Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:02 am See also: cuck, beta/omega male, orbiter, kissless virgin, male feminist
This is the first time I've heard of these terms. Duhron must be very familiar with them. Do you get called these a lot, Duhron?

Millenial and zoomer terms. A soy boy is like a fuck boy on estrogen.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:35 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.

Explain?

Slap, does that include masculine pussy, or feminine dick?

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:52 pm**

Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm
Soy Boy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.
You can prattle on all you want about your Nazi bullshit, it just proves what a whining little bitch you are. Independent sources confirm you affliction and you jump in right away to defend you tactic of calling everybody and anybody you do not agree with a Nazi. You suck Saul Alinskys dead cock all day long, and jump up and down screaming " You are a racist, you are a Nazi" as some kind of attempt to counter the ass plungerings you get here every day.

You are a tripe little midget mother fucker who has no smack, no intelligence and you are only good at repetitive, tedious and continual ankle biting taken from a smack playbook you could put on the head of a pin.

I backed up my stance with facts (not in this thread but in plenty of others) you don’t get to just SAY “hey I’m not a nazi” and have anyone but your echo chamber buddies believe you, you meth snorting nazi. Or have you moved to smoking it?

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:31 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:52 pmI backed up my stance with facts (not in this thread but in plenty of others) you don’t get to just SAY “hey I’m not a nazi” and have anyone but your echo chamber buddies believe you, you meth snorting nazi. Or have you moved to smoking it?

Definition of Nazism
: the body of political and economic doctrines held and put into effect by the Nazis in Germany from 1933 to 1945 including the totalitarian principle of government, predominance of especially Germanic groups assumed to be racially superior, and supremacy of the führer

MS, by the very definition of Nazism, you have certainly not shown 88 as such. He has never once exhibited racism, so that is out the window. By another example, you still post here and he could have easily banned you if he so chose, so authoritarianism is also wrong.

You really should define your parameters better before casting further aspersions. Not trying to stir the pot, just pointing out your argumentative flaw.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:42 pm**

Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm
Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm
Soy Boy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.
You can prattle on all you want about your Nazi bullshit, it just proves what a whining little bitch you are. Independent sources confirm your affliction and you jump in right away to defend you tactic of calling everybody and anybody you do not agree with a Nazi. You suck Saul Alinskys dead cock all day long, and jump up and down screaming " You are a racist, you are a Nazi" as some kind of attempt to counter the ass plungerings you get here every day.

You are a tripe little midget mother fucker who has no smack, no intelligence and you are only good at repetitive, tedious and continual ankle biting taken from a smack playbook you could put on the head of a pin.

How clever. Quoting your won post to add stress? Or are you still jittering from the DTs and meth twitches.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 8:27 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:52 pm
Derron wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:33 pm
Soy Boy wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:53 am No matter what your racist echo chamber might rattle out, 88 was labeled a nazi because of all the nazi tactics he uses. You were labeled one because of the same reasons and because you love the tweak and we all know how nazis love their tweak.
Just so you know.
You can prattle on all you want about your Nazi bullshit, it just proves what a whining little bitch you are. Independent sources confirm you affliction and you jump in right away to defend you tactic of calling everybody and anybody you do not agree with a Nazi. You suck Saul Alinskys dead cock all day long, and jump up and down screaming " You are a racist, you are a Nazi" as some kind of attempt to counter the ass plungerings you get here every day.

You are a tripe little midget mother fucker who has no smack, no intelligence and you are only good at repetitive, tedious and continual ankle biting taken from a smack playbook you could put on the head of a pin.
I backed up my stance with facts (not in this thread but in plenty of others) you don’t get to just SAY “hey I’m not a nazi” and have anyone but your echo chamber buddies believe you, you meth snorting nazi. Or have you moved to smoking it?

No, you don't back up with facts.
You back up with bullshit.

Saul Alinsky is the father of you leftists.

The way to tear down a free society is by pitting the people against one another through lies and distortions.

It's all there in Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals".

Saul Alinsky and Noam chomsky are two self loathing rats.

They love government control.
And the left wing socialists of today are the embodiment of their life's work.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:26 pm**

Jay,
He posts in the nog thread at pedo.net and never once has he show even a single moment of concern for all the racism here. He also voted for racist scum. So you might want to hold of on making decisions without evidence as you are prone to do.

What would he ban be for? I follow the authorities rules. How is that proof 88 isn’t an authoritarian?
You must have missed all the proof I have been posting while explaining The Process, which is all nazi 101.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:44 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:26 pm Jay,
He posts in the nog thread at mvscal.net and never once has he show even a single moment of concern for all the racism here. He also voted for racist scum. So you might want to hold of on making decisions without evidence as you are prone to do.

What would he ban be for? I follow the authorities rules. How is that proof 88 isn’t an authoritarian?
You must have missed all the proof I have been posting while explaining The Process, which is all nazi 101.

You throw around the word "racist" quite a bit.

It's our understanding that people like you and Al Sharpton, along with all the fake news hacks on msnbc and CNN, who throw around the word "racist",
Are mentally unstable.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:50 pm**

Trust the process
Never support your position
Noise and light

Sin,
88nazis

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:02 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:50 pm Trust the process
Never support your position
Noise and light

Sin,
88nazis

My position is that you shout racist and nazi, quite often.
According to clinical psychologists, that's a sign of mental instability.

Am I being obtuse?

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:05 pm**

Yes
Yes you are

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:27 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:26 pm Jay,
He posts in the nog thread at mvscal.net and never once has he show even a single moment of concern for all the racism here. He also voted for racist scum. So you might want to hold of on making decisions without evidence as you are prone to do.

What would he ban be for? I follow the authorities rules. How is that proof 88 isn’t an authoritarian?
You must have missed all the proof I have been posting while explaining The Process, which is all nazi 101.

Well, as I almost never read .net, especially that thread, I would have to take your word for it. Of course, just posting in that thread does not make one racist. It certainly isn't a endorsement of purity of thought and character, but again, it would depend on what was actually said. You haven't done anything worth banning specifically, but calling someone a Nazi ad infinitum, could qualify you if a mod was inclined. As well, 88 is an authority here, or at least, a mod, but that doesn't make him an authoritarian.

All I'm saying dude, is perhaps, just perhaps, it's time to reconsider the indictment.

On top of that, 88 isn't EAP. That's obvious.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:38 pm**

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:27 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:26 pm Jay,
He posts in the nog thread at mvscal.net and never once has he show even a single moment of concern for all the racism here. He also voted for racist scum. So you might want to hold of on making decisions without evidence as you are prone to do.

What would he ban be for? I follow the authorities rules. How is that proof 88 isn’t an authoritarian?
You must have missed all the proof I have been posting while explaining The Process, which is all nazi 101.
Well, as I almost never read .net, especially that thread, I would have to take your word for it. Of course, just posting in that thread does not make one racist. It certainly isn't a endorsement of purity of thought and character, but again, it would depend on what was actually said. You haven't done anything worth banning specifically, but calling someone a Nazi ad infinitum, could qualify you if a mod was inclined. As well, 88 is an authority here, or at least, a mod, but that doesn't make him an authoritarian.

All I'm saying dude, is perhaps, just perhaps, it's time to reconsider the indictment.

On top of that, 88 isn't EAP. That's obvious.

Ok. I'm nowhere near the standard of excellence that 88 has set.
However, in my defense, I'm a "work in progress". Who, with a little help and a nudge in the right direction, can achieve lofty goals in here.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:47 pm**

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:27 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:26 pm Jay,
He posts in the nog thread at mvscal.net and never once has he show even a single moment of concern for all the racism here. He also voted for racist scum. So you might want to hold of on making decisions without evidence as you are prone to do.

What would he ban be for? I follow the authorities rules. How is that proof 88 isn’t an authoritarian?
You must have missed all the proof I have been posting while explaining The Process, which is all nazi 101.
Well, as I almost never read .net, especially that thread, I would have to take your word for it. Of course, just posting in that thread does not make one racist. It certainly isn't a endorsement of purity of thought and character, but again, it would depend on what was actually said. You haven't done anything worth banning specifically, but calling someone a Nazi ad infinitum, could qualify you if a mod was inclined. As well, 88 is an authority here, or at least, a mod, but that doesn't make him an authoritarian.

All I'm saying dude, is perhaps, just perhaps, it's time to reconsider the indictment.

No it’s not.
I got all the evidence on my side.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:50 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:47 pm
Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:27 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:26 pm Jay,
He posts in the nog thread at mvscal.net and never once has he show even a single moment of concern for all the racism here. He also voted for racist scum. So you might want to hold of on making decisions without evidence as you are prone to do.

What would he ban be for? I follow the authorities rules. How is that proof 88 isn’t an authoritarian?
You must have missed all the proof I have been posting while explaining The Process, which is all nazi 101.
Well, as I almost never read .net, especially that thread, I would have to take your word for it. Of course, just posting in that thread does not make one racist. It certainly isn't a endorsement of purity of thought and character, but again, it would depend on what was actually said. You haven't done anything worth banning specifically, but calling someone a Nazi ad infinitum, could qualify you if a mod was inclined. As well, 88 is an authority here, or at least, a mod, but that doesn't make him an authoritarian.

All I'm saying dude, is perhaps, just perhaps, it's time to reconsider the indictment.

No it’s not.
I got all the evidence on my side.

Did you say "evidence"????
Testimony, Exculpatory, Demonstrative, or REAL?

Because from my vantage point,
You've got absolutely nothing.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:52 pm**

Because you only see and hear what you want to see and hear and the truth is not anything you ever want to see or hear.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:59 pm**

schmick wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:58 pm civil war now

Again--what are you waiting for, you pussy?

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:03 pm**

I already told you we can square off legally you fucking pussy.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:06 pm**

schmick wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:01 pm I kill the likes of you now, its murder, once the civil war starts, your ilk will be nothing but a "buckeye" sticker on the side of my rifle.
I dont break the law

Lol, you do drive 25+ over the speed limit.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:12 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:03 pm I already told you we can square off legally you fucking pussy.

Dude .... that's not wise. Unless you're talking lazer tag or paper-rock-scissors. Are you?

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:57 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:52 pm Because you only see and hear what you want to see and hear and the truth is not anything you ever want to see or hear.

What is truth? Is mine the same as yours?
Or is yours the same as James Comey's?
Because he lied to a federal judge.

If you're the same as Comey, you won't be practicing law much longer.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:59 pm**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:12 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:03 pm I already told you we can square off legally you fucking pussy.
Dude .... that's not wise. Unless you're talking lazer tag or paper-rock-scissors. Are you?

Rock paper scissors is so barbaric.
Chess is the sport of kings.
I could wipe the floor with you in chess. I'll even lay down one of my knights, just to make it fair.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:47 am**

Imus wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:42 pm [
How clever. Quoting your won post to add stress? Or are you still jittering from the DTs and meth twitches.

Fuck you troll. Pretty close to outing yourself you piece of shit.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:56 am**

EAP wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:59 pm I could wipe the floor with you in chess. I'll even lay down one of my knights, just to make it fair.

I don't play chess. Shrug. Fuck it. Perhaps you could teach me. Why is the knight this important, that the removal of one levels the playing field?

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:22 pm**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:56 am
EAP wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:59 pm I could wipe the floor with you in chess. I'll even lay down one of my knights, just to make it fair.
I don't play chess. Shrug. Fuck it. Perhaps you could teach me. Why is the knight this important, that the removal of one levels the playing field?

The knight moves different than any other piece, strategic.
Bishops move diagonally.
The queen is most powerful, able to move any direction.

BTW?

The president just had the Iranian general/terrorist killed!
Along with the Iranian scumbag who was working with him.

Stay tuned. This needed to happen because they were attacking our interests. Getting more and more emboldened.

Obama's close personal friend, valerie Jarrett is from Iran.

For 8 years, Obama appeased Iran.
That bullshit is over.

When you appease a terrorist, they become more emboldened.

We don't appease terrorists.
We butcher and slaughter them.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:28 pm**

All pieces are strategic. Let's go the other direction: can you give an example of winning without one's knights?

As for what just happened yesterday, my understanding is that the US committed a major blunder by targeting Suleimani the Iranian while he was on Iraqi soil.

Are we at war with both Iran and Iraq? Are Iran and Iraq now allies? Did Iraq sign off on this before we struck?

What does Israel say?

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:35 pm**

EAP wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:22 pm We don't appease terrorists.
We butcher and slaughter them.

We dance like Israelis.

New York lost its signature skyline over similar shit, 20 years ago. 2000 people died and three buildings fell. And then we targeted Afghanistan for Saudi Arabia's sins.

It is 20 years later. Something is wrong. You don't trust the MSM -- what is the American MSM stating?

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:03 pm**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:28 pm All pieces are strategic. Let's go the other direction: can you give an example of winning without one's knights?

As for what just happened yesterday, my understanding is that the US committed a major blunder by targeting Suleimani the Iranian while he was on Iraqi soil.

Are we at war with both Iran and Iraq? Are Iran and Iraq now allies? Did Iraq sign off on this before we struck?

What does Israel say?

No.
We didn't make a blunder.
That's the left wing fake socialist press talking.

Surely you can separate left wing BS propaganda from fact, can't you?

There is no more 2001. Today, we strike back at acts of aggression.
Obama's personal friend and adviser is Valerie Jarrett, a commie lover from Iran.
For 8 years, Barry's policies toward Iran were pure appeasement, which emboldened Iran.

The USA JUST STOPPED an imminent threat.

Any left wing posters who say otherwise, are treasonous.

That general we just killed, was a fucking terrorist. He should've been tortured.

Top democrats in this country are already making treasonous statements.

How are you not on the same page with me?

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:33 pm**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:35 pm 2000 people died and three buildings fell.

It was 2,996 with more being added as they die from related causes you fucking troll. Get your numbers right.

Posted: **Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:07 am**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:28 pm
As for what just happened yesterday, my understanding is that the US committed a major blunder by targeting Suleimani the Iranian while he was on Iraqi soil.

Your understanding is flawed. What the fuck do you think he was doing on Iraqi soil? Enjoying a holiday?

Posted: **Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:10 am**

Iraqi soil

T1B

This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway

Re: This explains the whole Nazi schtick anyway