T1B

From left to right: Sec. Education, Sec. Treasury, Prime Minister, Sec. Interior. The oldest is 34.





2341

The State wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:03 am
From left to right: Sec. Education, Sec. Treasury, Prime Minister, Sec. Interior. The oldest is 34.





2341

Are they socialist?
Because, maybe I've been wrong.

The State wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:03 am
From left to right: Sec. Education, Sec. Treasury, Prime Minister, Sec. Interior. The oldest is 34.





2341

I'm just imagining what their cabinet meetings are like.
Socialism might work in a strictly homogeneous society of course.

Socialism is doable in a small extremely white Northern European country.

As for the rank'em, that's a tough one. Pretty much any order would do. Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

Upon further review, I have to put 2 into leadoff based on her rather nice breastusus.

3 is what an actual from the factory, female Kaitlyn Jenner would look like.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

I laffed.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:15 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

I laffed.

OK, maybe there's a 7 there and a 5, but the bottom line is, there's a whole lotta "meh" there.

The more I look at 1 the more I see Mr Bean. That doesn't work in her favor much.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:29 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:15 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

I laffed.

OK, maybe there's a 7 there and a 5, but the bottom line is, there's a whole lotta "meh" there.

1 and 3 are sexy. You must consider the rest, not just the face.
Also, there's the "women of power" aspect that takes it to a whole new level as well.

Hard to tell from the photo, but it's a good bet that they've got bangin' bods as well.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Socialism is doable in a small extremely white Northern European country.

As for the rank'em, that's a tough one. Pretty much any order would do. Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

I'm inclined to agree.
Socialism works when the women all look like Scorsese's vision of women in "Wolf of wall street".
It's when you allow "others" in to muddy up the waters, so to speak, thru open borders, that brings all sorts of problems.

The State and EAP's posts complement each other. They are both correct.

Their politics after attaining office will determine if they rise from 6.5 to 9 or fall to 4.

EAP wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:41 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Socialism is doable in a small extremely white Northern European country.

As for the rank'em, that's a tough one. Pretty much any order would do. Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

I'm inclined to agree.
Socialism works when the women all look like Scorsese's vision of women in "Wolf of wall street".
It's when you allow "others" in to muddy up the waters, so to speak, thru open borders, that brings all sorts of problems.

You come from 'that other board', so you know that the joke is that Finns aren't white, they're Asian mutts (ie Mongol rape babies). The palest blonde, bluest eyed Asians you'll see in your life.

Smack, she does look like an XX chromosome Bruce Jenner! And in 30 years, she'll look like Caitlynn. What are their politics?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:49 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:41 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Socialism is doable in a small extremely white Northern European country.

As for the rank'em, that's a tough one. Pretty much any order would do. Nothing great, nothing terrible. A line up of 6.5s.

I'm inclined to agree.
Socialism works when the women all look like Scorsese's vision of women in "Wolf of wall street".
It's when you allow "others" in to muddy up the waters, so to speak, thru open borders, that brings all sorts of problems.

You come from 'that other board', so you know that the joke is that Finns aren't white, they're Asian mutts (ie Mongol rape babies). The palest blonde, bluest eyed Asians you'll see in your life.

Well if that's the case, that's great, as it's a well known fact that asian women love and honor the penis. Literally worship at the alter of it.
Bow down before it.
Make sacrifices to it.
Sleep with it in their mouths.

Asian women are notorious for wearing the pants in their relationships with men, not the other way around.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:03 pm Asian women are notorious for wearing the pants in their relationships with men, not the other way around.

And that's the price you pay for sleeping with your penis in their mouth.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:29 pm
OK, maybe there's a 7 there and a 5, but the bottom line is, there's a whole lotta "meh" there.

Post up your last 4 pieces of ass and we will be the judge of who is "meh" or not.

Any American male worth his hard dick would bang anyone of them with out hesitation or concern for their ranking. Unless of course you want to pass any one of those up for your perceived "10".

Derron wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:25 pm Post up your last 4 pieces of ass and we will be the judge of who is "meh" or not.

Any American male worth his hard dick would bang anyone of them with out hesitation or concern for their ranking. Unless of course you want to pass any one of those up for your perceived "10".

Nailed it.

I may not be



But 3 and 4 are certainly worthy.

They’re all doable. Solid 6.5-7.5s, which is a perfect fishing range. Add a few points if their English is shitty.

A man in his 20s may not agree but I’d argue that same man wouldn’t know a good scotch or espresso or steak if it was thrown right in his face.

3124. Would happily bang them in any order.

Derron wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:25 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:29 pm
OK, maybe there's a 7 there and a 5, but the bottom line is, there's a whole lotta "meh" there.

Post up your last 4 pieces of ass and we will be the judge of who is "meh" or not.

Any American male worth his hard dick would bang anyone of them with out hesitation or concern for their ranking. Unless of course you want to pass any one of those up for your perceived "10".

Are you channeling EAP, or is EAP channeling you?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:28 pm

Derron wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:25 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:29 pm
OK, maybe there's a 7 there and a 5, but the bottom line is, there's a whole lotta "meh" there.

Post up your last 4 pieces of ass and we will be the judge of who is "meh" or not.

Any American male worth his hard dick would bang anyone of them with out hesitation or concern for their ranking. Unless of course you want to pass any one of those up for your perceived "10".

Are you channeling EAP, or is EAP channeling you?

Let's face it. A homogeneous society with hot babes in positions of power?
Secure borders to keep out the undesirables, if you know what we mean, "wink wink".
What else could you possibly ask for?

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Socialism is doable in a small extremely white Northern European country.

Pinko

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:39 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:40 pm Socialism is doable in a small extremely white Northern European country.

Pinko

Dude.
Commie pinkos are you guys.
Your world is very much an "upsidedown" alternate universe.

Can't you just forget the politics for one second and enjoy a country ruled by sexy sirens?
You commie pinko you.

schmick wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:08 pm Great, khardashians running a country, Finland is fucked. Time for the US to get out of NATO now

Finland's not in NATO, you stupid fuck.

So how do we do the rank 'ems anyway? Is it supposed to be list the numbers from left to right as who you would do first? as in 4231, meaning you'd bang 4 first and then 2, 3, then 1?


Or do you do it with the number under the corresponding chick? As in for 4231 you'd bang the one on the right first and the one on the left last?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:35 am So how do we do the rank 'ems anyway? Is it supposed to be list the numbers from left to right as who you would do first? as in 4231, meaning you'd bang 4 first and then 2, 3, then 1?


Or do you do it with the number under the corresponding chick? As in for 4231 you'd bang the one on the right first and the one on the left last?

Does it matter ? It has always been left to right in your desired order of fuckability. But if to get the job done, you had to do 3 before 1 for some reason, then that works too. # 1 has some pretty decent lips on her that could serve a real good purpose, 2 has a huge rack, and the other two could do a double if so inclined.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:35 am So how do we do the rank 'ems anyway?

Preferably with no dudes in the pic, but hey, I can’t speak for you. Whatever floats your boat

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:03 pm Asian women are notorious for wearing the pants in their relationships with men, not the other way around.

That would explain Popetard.

"Brothers and Sisters"




That's called "Friday Night" . . .
4321










"Jump on the liberal Cantor's Love Train" !












The Liberal Prime Minister of Finland













Can... you... dig it?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 1:56 pm

After trump's re-election, it's not too early to follow Finland's lead and get started on IVANKA 2024.
with Margot Robbie as her VP.
Republican party of course.

Let Hillary/warren try to win against REAL WOMEN.

EAP wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:19 pm
After trump's re-election, it's not too early to follow Finland's lead and get started on IVANKA 2024.
with Margot Robbie as her VP.
Republican party of course.

Let Hillary/warren try to win against REAL WOMEN.

I worry about you, sometimes, EAP.

Derron wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:25 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:29 pm
OK, maybe there's a 7 there and a 5, but the bottom line is, there's a whole lotta "meh" there.

Post up your last 4 pieces of ass and we will be the judge of who is "meh" or not.

Any American male worth his hard dick would bang anyone of them with out hesitation or concern for their ranking. Unless of course you want to pass any one of those up for your perceived "10".

Not saying any one of them aren't perfectly serviceable. Just no stunning beauties.

1 looks like Mr Bean,
2 is kinda nice, but there's something weird looking about her. I suspect it might just be a bad pic. She might look much better in a different shot.
3 is OK, but a tad manish.
4 is sort of like 2. I think it just might not be a great pic of her.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:14 pm
Not saying any one of them aren't perfectly serviceable. Just no stunning beauties.

1 looks like Mr Bean,
2 is kinda nice, but there's something weird looking about her. I suspect it might just be a bad pic. She might look much better in a different shot.
3 is OK, but a tad manish.
4 is sort of like 2. I think it just might not be a great pic of her.

They're intelligent run of the mill Finnish broads. They're not supermodels.

For perhaps the second time in the last 20 years or so, we agree.

They are "meh", perhaps "meh+"

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 1:56 pm

Much better pic here. This is well above meh. Still not supermodel material, but well into the pretty range.

#1 would get my dick up her ass so that I don't have to look at her face. #2 would be a great tit fuck after the 2:00 bar closing. #3 is a reasonable piece of ass who could get herself drilled hard missionary style multiple times. #4 is a "kitchenly" type and would be dripping my sperm while she's out there making me a sandwich. I would do them on M, T, W, TH, while saving up enough nut for the real ass I would be unloading on on F, S, and SU.

So to summarize:
None of you REALLY have anything against Socialism and you’re all a bunch of pigs.

Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 3:56 pm So to summarize:
None of you REALLY have anything against Socialism and you’re all a bunch of pigs.

I don't have a problem with small scale, voluntary socialism. You and your boyfriends should be allowed to form whatever arrangements you want. I wish you well.

My problem, and the problem of anyone that bothers to look at history and understands basic human behavior, knows that on a large scale, it has a pretty good track record of going completely to shit.

I really do wish this were not the case. I wish human beings all could work for the common good. If this were the case, we'd spend our energy building fun stuff, productive things.

But we don't live in that fantasy world.

We live in a world where the default setting of people is self interest and many aer willing to do whatever to whomever in their self interest.

Some of us get this inconvenient truth and realize that a capitalist system with strong private property rights and a tight rein on national government is the best way for us to get along.

If Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro aren't examples enough to prove this, you are one seriously stupid POS.

And save me the "Hitler wasn't a socialist" clap trap. He most certainly was, even if his version of it leaned more to crony capitalist than actual government ownership of the means of production.

Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2020 3:56 pm So to summarize:
None of you REALLY have anything against Socialism and you’re all a bunch of pigs.

No.
Socialism is against the human spirit, liberty, freedom, and dignity.
Humans don't want a government or king lording over them.

Small homogeneous countries maybe.
But the rest of civilization?
No way.