Page 1 of 1
Re: So shouldn’t Reuters be trusted?
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:17 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Nice paywall on the second link, dipshit.
Re: So shouldn’t Reuters be trusted?
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:32 pm
by EAP
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:17 pm
Nice paywall on the second link, dipshit.
The planet goes thru climate change constantly since its very beginning some 5 billion years ago.
From extreme ice ages to extreme warning over and over and over. LONG BEFORE we were even here.
We are nothing.
You low IQ cocksuckers are blindly following left wing government control socialists who bankroll the scientific community.
Climate change is a given as I've just explained.
We are currently in-between extreme ice ages.
Nothing we do or say will stop the coming reality that our planet has in store for us.
Left wing government control socialists are spazzed out cowards.
Ignore them. The next extreme ice age will extinct them.
Especially that fat ass cow Al Gore.
Re: So shouldn’t Reuters be trusted?
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:59 am
by Innocent Bystander
Reuters is MSM.
Take all MSM. Overlay the reports on top of one another. What exists in the silent spaces between the overlaps is The Truth.
Re: So shouldn’t Reuters be trusted?
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 12:38 am
by mvscal
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:59 am
Reuters is MSM.
Take all MSM. Overlay the reports on top of one another. What exists in the silent spaces between the overlaps is The Truth.
Indeed. What
does lurk in the silent spaces? Nearly 200 people have been arrested for arson in Australia while the media bleats climate change. The unasked question lurking in the silent space is whether or not this is a deliberate campaign of terrorism or simply 200 random jerkoffs lighting fires.
In any event, arsonists should be burned alive when caught and convicted.