A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Good to see you embracing the idea of federalism. Not sure all your filthy hippy commie pals are gonna approve though.
Different states should handle this differently. Hell, same for counties.
A rural county in upstate NY needs a different plan of action than Brooklyn.
While you guys are in the federalist spirit, I suggest Gavin should announce plans for Cali single-payer healfcare.
Show us bumpkins to the East how it’s done.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Different states should handle this differently. Hell, same for counties.
A rural county in upstate NY needs a different plan of action than Brooklyn.
While you guys are in the federalist spirit, I suggest Gavin should announce plans for Cali single-payer healfcare.
Show us bumpkins to the East how it’s done.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4786
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
So Newsome is the predicted Anti-Christ?
What's his background?
Because nation-states are really city-states. Nig.gas, be wary.
Fuck you, China, or thank you China for ripping off the band-aid?
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4786
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Good arguments, but still wary of the gerrymandering effect.smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 4:21 pm Good to see you embracing the idea of federalism. Not sure all your filthy hippy commie pals are gonna approve though.
Different states should handle this differently. Hell, same for counties.
A rural county in upstate NY needs a different plan of action than Brooklyn.
While you guys are in the federalist spirit, I suggest Gavin should announce plans for Cali single-payer healfcare.
Show us bumpkins to the East how it’s done.
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Brown retired. Newsome is Governor now.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Not sure what gerrymandering has to do with states handling their own affairs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13470
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
CA should secede already.
But the author of this pile of crap is cut from the screwy mold. Claims minority rule by the GOP, a war on Team D ideals, etc.
Just leave already if you don’t like the US. But stop blaming the Feds for this and claiming you would have had a better response. While the pandemic was becoming a thing, you were wrapped up in a bungled Impeachment.
But the author of this pile of crap is cut from the screwy mold. Claims minority rule by the GOP, a war on Team D ideals, etc.
Just leave already if you don’t like the US. But stop blaming the Feds for this and claiming you would have had a better response. While the pandemic was becoming a thing, you were wrapped up in a bungled Impeachment.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
You're about as reality challenged as your narcissist Orange Dear Leader.
"if you don't like it here then leave." Nice job.
Can you actually refute anything in that article?
Didn't think so.
Now, go watch some re-runs of the daily Trump Show. That should settle you down.
"if you don't like it here then leave." Nice job.
Can you actually refute anything in that article?
Didn't think so.
Now, go watch some re-runs of the daily Trump Show. That should settle you down.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4786
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Your point that different counties have different needs within even the same state.smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:13 pm Not sure what gerrymandering has to do with states handling their own affairs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Ok. The same question applies.Innocent Bystander wrote:Your point that different counties have different needs within even the same state.smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:13 pm Not sure what gerrymandering has to do with states handling their own affairs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Since when is it the responsibility of the Federal government to provide the State of California with medical supplies?
California has all the sovereign authority necessary to raise revenue for the purpose of purchasing medical supplies. I would suggest that California's spending priorities are wildly misguided.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13470
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Sure. Lots of pure shit in that opinion piece:
First off their aren’t Democratic Party laws. There are US laws and State laws. Second these Democratic values like murdering unborn babies, allowing illegal aliens to vote, sanctuary cities, etc, etc, etc are illegal and wrong in most cases.So far, the Republican Party’s war on democratic values, institutions and laws
Nice projection and quite sad actually. In fact there have been other opinion pieces by Team D members that are discussing what to do when Trump tries to delay elections. So is Trump going to delay elections or is he trying to railroad them thru in their scheduled time?The GOP intends to restrict vote-by-mail and other legitimate enfranchisement to suppress turnout amid fear, uncertainty and disease.
More Team D bullshit talking points. Is this a reference to Trump losing the general election? If so why does Team D hate the Constitution? If it is a reference to something else, then this fiction writer needs to spell it out.At some point this civil war by other means, with the goal of enshrining GOP minority rule,
The Feds shouldn’t be involved in Health Care. Further this clown is talking about illegal immigrants not getting support, because we bend over backwards for legal immigrants. But by the very definition illegal immigrants don’t deserve our support. Protecting the environment? CA is free to enact whatever they feel necessary, the Feds aren’t stopping that.The federal government is no longer a reliable partner in delivering health care, in supporting immigrants, supporting LGBT people, in protecting the environment, so we need to forge our own path,
Meanwhile in the real world Team D fought Trump trying to put in place travel restrictions and went to the racist card for doing it. Meanwhile if Team D thinks they would have done a better job that is a joke. Team D was focused on Impeachment instead of a growing pandemic. But look no further than NY’s response and failures in containing this. Cuomo said his state needed more ventilators from the Feds, but then when called on it he said they weren’t using the ones in storage as those were being saved. WTF?the Trump administration’s failure to protect against a pandemic.
What a crock of shit. Team R could just as easily argue that Team D is waging a war on Democracy. What with their drive to overhaul the 2nd. Or allowing illegal immigrants to vote. Or harboring criminals in their sanctuary cities.The GOP war on democracy is inspired by a drive for racial and cultural supremacy that jeopardizes the democratic aspirations and human rights of California’s multiracial citizenry.
This cuts both ways. Should states take this stand towards attacks on the 2nd? Or to States protecting their borders with other Nations?What is the difference, conceptually, between a state deploying its power to protect its population’s health and a state using it to protect its population’s democratic rights?
Team D was the heirs of the Confederacy, so did this guy just have a moment of clarity or is he spinning more fiction?With the heirs of the Confederacy now reigning in Washington,
So yeah this piece of fiction is nothing but shit.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13470
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Thanks for making the smaller Federal Government argument we have been making for years.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Keep lying about the 25bil a year fucktard.schmick wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 11:39 pm The state of California already had the medical supplies.
Governor Schwarzenegger had mobile hospitals, millions of masks and thousands of respirators on hand for just this sort of issue.
Its was governor brown and his lt governor newscum that got rid of all that equipment
https://www.politico.com/states/califor ... lt-1269954
brown and newscum thought it was a better idea to build a monorail and waste 25 billion a year on illegal immigrants
And we had enough ventilators and apparently enough masks because 20,000 people have it so far. That’s .05 percent of the population.
So all the isolation looks to be paying off.
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
Who has brought up Wickard and what a bullshit case it is earlier and more often than I have?Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat Apr 11, 2020 12:22 am Thanks for making the smaller Federal Government argument we have been making for years.
Not only are you fat you are also slow.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4786
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
How much less would it have cost to maintain it, especially since the Obama administration itself recommended keeping stockpiles.schmick wrote: ↑Fri Apr 10, 2020 11:39 pm The state of California already had the medical supplies.
Governor Schwarzenegger had mobile hospitals, millions of masks and thousands of respirators on hand for just this sort of issue.
Its was governor brown and his lt governor newscum that got rid of all that equipment
https://www.politico.com/states/califor ... lt-1269954
brown and newscum thought it was a better idea to build a monorail and waste 25 billion a year on illegal immigrants
Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights
I told you a bunch of times why that study is shit.
As for Ca and CV19, again .05% of the population infected, enough ventilators and masks.
As for Ca and CV19, again .05% of the population infected, enough ventilators and masks.