Pikkkle can breathe just a little easier

[Bill in Houston]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... n-n1231018

You can still be fired for being to stupid do anything productive.

[Innocent Bystander]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... n-n1231018

You can still be fired for being to stupid do anything productive.

Pedophilia, zoophilia and necrophilia are sexual orientations.

[Jay in Phoenix]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... n-n1231018

You can still be fired for being to stupid do anything productive.

So is misspelling the word "too", in context, depending upon your job. English 101 dumbfuck.

[Bill in Houston]

Wow. Great catch. Your grammar smack is excellent.

Too bad that’s the best take you can grunt out of your decrepit mind.

[Jay in Phoenix]

So that's all you've got pin head?

Duly noted. Try having an actual take you gutless troll.

Stop hiding behind the false face and just be yourself. Or...continue to piss yourself down you leg like the gutless cur you are.

The truth will shit you free.

[TONTO]

TONTO see Nazi Jayne start to have meltdown.

Supreme Court rule in your favor today. Why don't happy?

TONTO think you should let Monday come to you.

Enjoy your victory and be happy. Life to short to be grammar smack bitch.

[Bill in Houston]

So that's all you've got pin head?

Duly noted. Try having an actual take you gutless troll.

Stop hiding behind the false face and just be yourself. Or...continue to piss yourself down you leg like the gutless cur you are.

The truth will shit you free.

You little bitch. You come in and deliver the vicious grammar smack and then stand behind it like you made some kind of statement? Fuck off

No take on SCOTUS? Nothing? Noted. Now go fuck off.

[Bill in Houston]

More great takes

[BSmack]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... n-n1231018

You can still be fired for being to stupid do anything productive.

Pedophilia, zoophilia and necrophilia are sexual orientations.

Since it's impossible for children, dogs and Corpses to give consent, those are illegal acts. All of the laws regarding pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia are rooted in the concept of consent. If you can't get consent, you can't fuck it.

[Innocent Bystander]

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... n-n1231018

You can still be fired for being to stupid do anything productive.

Pedophilia, zoophilia and necrophilia are sexual orientations.

Since it's impossible for children, dogs and Corpses to give consent, those are illegal acts. All of the laws regarding pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia are rooted in the concept of consent. If you can't get consent, you can't fuck it.

It's irrelevant whether they're illegal or not. Homosexuality and miscegenation were both illegal acts, vigorously argued against on scientific, religious, ethical and moral grounds. Now they aren't.

Pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia are sexual orientations, as biologically legitimate as heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexualism and polysexuality (ie attraction to transexuals).

Baby they were born that way.

Since they were born that way, it is illegal to discriminate against them for something they have no control over. It is illegal to argue they are somehow different from heterosexuality or homosexuality.

Besides, pedophilia was part of GLB before the T, Qs, 2 and + sign were added.

If someone thinks they're a cat or a dolphin in a human body, they should have the same rights to be treated like their image of themselves the same as human trannies.

And the dead don't give a fuck. They're dead.

The groundwork is laid officially now, especially coupled with Utah re-recognizing polygamy (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ygamy-bill). The age of consent -- the species of consent -- will be challenged.

[Bill in Houston]

Thanks for the anthropological breakdown

So, no doesn’t mean no anymore?

[Innocent Bystander]

Thanks for the anthropological breakdown

So, no doesn’t mean no anymore?

Bsmack is saying minors (however 'minor' may be legally defined in your jurisdiction), animals and the dead cannot consent so that even when they say yes, it's a no.

The stallion in Enumclaw wasn't drugged, and neither was the man whose intestines he (it) perforated.

Traci Lords and the sisters Sable and Coral Shields weren't drugged against their will, either.

The dead who aren't murder victims no longer care.

Yes means no, when the law says it means no. That's fine. Narrowly defining sexual orientation as hetero/homo/trans is ripe for test cases, though. I'm just saying.

[Kierland]

So that's all you've got pin head?

It’s all you commented on lez. Do you even know how to use English?

[Kierland]

So that's all you've got pin head?

Duly noted. Try having an actual take you gutless troll.

Stop hiding behind the false face and just be yourself. Or...continue to piss yourself down you leg like the gutless cur you are.

The truth will shit you free.

You little bitch. You come in and deliver the vicious grammar smack and then stand behind it like you made some kind of statement? Fuck off

No take on SCOTUS? Nothing? Noted. Now go fuck off.

That'll tell him! You go, girl!

Another white flag from fatty.

[Kierland]

Pedophilia, zoophilia and necrophilia are sexual orientations.

Since it's impossible for children, dogs and Corpses to give consent, those are illegal acts. All of the laws regarding pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia are rooted in the concept of consent. If you can't get consent, you can't fuck it.

It's irrelevant whether they're illegal or not. Homosexuality and miscegenation were both illegal acts, vigorously argued against on scientific, religious, ethical and moral grounds. Now they aren't.

Pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia are sexual orientations, as biologically legitimate as heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexualism and polysexuality (ie attraction to transexuals).

Baby they were born that way.

Since they were born that way, it is illegal to discriminate against them for something they have no control over. It is illegal to argue they are somehow different from heterosexuality or homosexuality.

Besides, pedophilia was part of GLB before the T, Qs, 2 and + sign were added.

If someone thinks they're a cat or a dolphin in a human body, they should have the same rights to be treated like their image of themselves the same as human trannies.

And the dead don't give a fuck. They're dead.

The groundwork is laid officially now, especially coupled with Utah re-recognizing polygamy (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ygamy-bill). The age of consent -- the species of consent -- will be challenged.

He said consent Steven. Try and focus.

[Innocent Bystander]

Exactly. I'm saying the concept and definitions of consent will be challenged. That giant sucking sound you hear is the slippery slope tilting another 9 degrees.

[Kierland]

So it’s a bad thing gay people can’t get fired for being gay, gotcha.

[Jay in Phoenix]

So that's all you've got pin head?

It’s all you commented on lez. Do you even know how to use English?

Considering how you usually type tiny faggot, the real question is, do you? There was nothing else to comment on here. I'm not clicking on a gutless troll's link, so I don't give a fuck what it was about. Kindly do fuck off nog sucker.

[Kierland]

So that's all you've got pin head?

It’s all you commented on lez. Do you even know how to use English?

Considering how you usually type tiny faggot, the real question is, do you?
So you are going with IKYABWAI. Props I guess.

There was nothing else to comment on here. I'm not clicking on a gutless troll's link, so I don't give a fuck what it was about. Kindly do fuck off nog sucker.
So there was something else to say. Nice going lez.

[Kierland]

Wicked third grade smack fatty.

[EAP]

So it’s a bad thing gay people can’t get fired for being gay, gotcha.

No. Once again you are not living in reality.
It's about science. Why do left wing nutjobs deny science?

IB is 100% correct. This issue is not settled. For example.
A transgender applies for a job.
According to science, she's a male, BUT on the application, puts down "female". Right there, the employer legally doesn't have to hire based on "lying on the application"

And later on, can legally terminate the employment due to "lying on the application".

I'm wondering how these judges missed this.

[smackaholic]

IB mentioned polygamy.

Kind of surprised that the polys haven't been grouped in with the rest of the alphabet soup freakshow. I see absolutely no reason why they shouldn't receive the same legal rights as homos.

[Slap]

Since it's impossible for children, dogs and Corpses to give consent, those are illegal acts. All of the laws regarding pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia are rooted in the concept of consent. If you can't get consent, you can't fuck it.

Do you think a judge could be persuaded into accepting that when a dog starts humping your leg he is giving consent?

[Kierland]

IB mentioned polygamy.

Kind of surprised that the polys haven't been grouped in with the rest of the alphabet soup freakshow. I see absolutely no reason why they shouldn't receive the same legal rights as homos.

Freak show.
Like 88 getting pegged? Or is that ok?
Hot lez porn too freaky for you?

[BSmack]

Exactly. I'm saying the concept and definitions of consent will be challenged. That giant sucking sound you hear is the slippery slope tilting another 9 degrees.

If anyone is stupid enough to make those challenges, they will fail.

[EAP]

Exactly. I'm saying the concept and definitions of consent will be challenged. That giant sucking sound you hear is the slippery slope tilting another 9 degrees.

If anyone is stupid enough to make those challenges, they will fail.

If you can convince a judge that a biological male is a female.
Anything is possible.

[Innocent Bystander]

Exactly. I'm saying the concept and definitions of consent will be challenged. That giant sucking sound you hear is the slippery slope tilting another 9 degrees.

If anyone is stupid enough to make those challenges, they will fail.

If you can convince a judge that a biological male is a female.
Anything is possible.

That'll rack.

[BSmack]

Exactly. I'm saying the concept and definitions of consent will be challenged. That giant sucking sound you hear is the slippery slope tilting another 9 degrees.

If anyone is stupid enough to make those challenges, they will fail.

If you can convince a judge that a biological male is a female.
Anything is possible.

You're comparing apples and black cocks. The standard for giving consent are only going to get tougher, not easier. It has only been in the last 20 or so years that "she was passed out" stopped being an acceptable defense on a rape charge. And that is for the logic I've already provided, no ability to give consent.

[Innocent Bystander]

If anyone is stupid enough to make those challenges, they will fail.

If you can convince a judge that a biological male is a female.
Anything is possible.

You're comparing apples and black cocks. The standard for giving consent are only going to get tougher, not easier. It has only been in the last 20 or so years that "she was passed out" stopped being an acceptable defense on a rape charge. And that is for the logic I've already provided, no ability to give consent.

It's gone the other way, though, to where 'she asked for my number', 'she bragged to her friends over facebook that we hooked up', 'she blew up my texts asking to see me again', and ' she suckled my dick and told me yes' are not defenses against a rape accusation, either.

But men still can't claim rape (or domestic abuse), except in prison.

Desmond is Amazing stripper dances on a public street while older gay men give him dollar bills. Three year olds are allowed to consent to gender re-assignment hormone therapy against their parents' wishes, because the kid can make up their own mind that putting a dress on makes you a girl and throwing a ball makes you a boy.

Consent is being eased to lower the age. If a 9 year old can consent to creating a dating site (wtf?) for other 9 year olds who want to have a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship with other trannies, then the slippery slope is fully vertical and we're still in hang time from the shock.

[EAP]

If you can convince a judge that a biological male is a female.
Anything is possible.

You're comparing apples and black cocks. The standard for giving consent are only going to get tougher, not easier. It has only been in the last 20 or so years that "she was passed out" stopped being an acceptable defense on a rape charge. And that is for the logic I've already provided, no ability to give consent.

It's gone the other way, though, to where 'she asked for my number', 'she bragged to her friends over facebook that we hooked up', 'she blew up my texts asking to see me again', and ' she suckled my dick and told me yes' are not defenses against a rape accusation, either.

But men still can't claim rape (or domestic abuse), except in prison.

Desmond is Amazing stripper dances on a public street while older gay men give him dollar bills. Three year olds are allowed to consent to gender re-assignment hormone therapy against their parents' wishes, because the kid can make up their own mind that putting a dress on makes you a girl and throwing a ball makes you a boy.

Consent is being eased to lower the age. If a 9 year old can consent to creating a dating site (wtf?) for other 9 year olds who want to have a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship with other trannies, then the slippery slope is fully vertical and we're still in hang time from the shock.

IB is 100% correct.
The slippery slope has been a slippin' and a slidin' for decades now. So much so, that the Supreme Court has been tainted.
I'm secretly hoping for Ruth ginsburg to drop dead in a few, so president trump can appoint
Amy Coney Barrett, a beautiful catholic Reagan conservative and Scalia clone.

Let's see if ruthie can kick the bucket.

[Left Seater]

I don’t wish death upon anyone.

If Ruth were to go in the next 4 months, Screwy and the libs will lose their minds when Trump appoints a minority female.

[EAP]

I don’t wish death upon anyone.

If Ruth were to go in the next 4 months, Screwy and the libs will lose their minds when Trump appoints a minority female.

her name is Mary Coney Barrett.
She is a brilliant, beautiful catholic woman.
She greatly admires Antonin Gregory Scalia..

The president will appoint this great woman to the high court.