Is this true or false?Feds and tribal cops have authority, the state, city, county courts have no jurisdiction. City cops, county sheriff, and state police will still be able to arrest crimes in their presence or follow fleeing suspects. Hardly anything changes.
Is this true or false?"The City of Tulsa, in support of Oklahoma, responds that the Supreme Court’s ruling could place the vast majority of the city under Muscogee (Creek) sovereignty, subjecting its citizens to a new system of laws and practices. Such disruptions, Tulsa argues, would extend into a plethora of areas including taxation and land zoning."
"Kansas and other western states (“Kansas”), in support of Oklahoma, emphasize that these complicated jurisdictional questions could impact tribal-state relations across the United States, not just in one state."
Is this true or false?The ruling merely states that if you’re a member of a specific tribe then Oklahoma state law does not apply to you in those areas. Federal law is still in effect.
Is this true or false?how many of these land treaties weren't formally disassembled by congress? Imagine CA losing all congressional seats
Is this true or false? And finally,This isn't about breaking up the United States and the United States losing sovereignty over territory. This is about breaking up the States to further impose "Federal" despotism.
Is this true or false? If true, what are the long-term repercussions?We wont know until it shakes out, but heres the most likely scenario:
People still own their land, they just pay property taxes to the tribe, probably at a lower rate
All state parks in the area become tribal land, probably get over hunted and cut down. /pol/ lols
The tribal police force is now responsible for those new areas, likely local pd will get the option to transfer into the tribal police or transfer to a different department or retire. Good luck getting the funding for enough tribal cops.
All quotes are from the net equivalent of clones, not legal experts.
Thank you for your time.
