T1B

schmick wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:56 am
Michael Shellenberger interviewed a homeless man who had been in Frisco since last June, he was from Texas, and he said that the city pays him 650 a month in cash and gives him 200 a month in food stamps plus a state ID, counseling and a free transit pass just for being homeless in san francisco.

If that is true, every State should be offering free transportation to San Francisco. Just walk around homeless areas and show them the benefits CA and SF offer and send bus after bus there with them.

Yeah. It's a living hell here...

Riverschmucktucky wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 8:14 pm Old photos from high enough in the sky

Old photos?

You mean old by a few days ago?

Good god Trumpers are fucking retards...


https://twitter.com/SanFranciscoBA/stat ... s%2F107143

More distraction to keep you from the coup they tried and the one they are planning.

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:00 pm Did they ever get the shit in the street thing cleared up, or are they still third worlding?

Nope. Was there a few weeks ago and the downtown hotel was doing everything they could to move the homeless along and keep the sidewalks on their block as clean as possible.

It’s really quite sad what the Bay Area has become. It has a ton of natural beauty and the liberals there just can’t get out of their own way and continue to fuck it up.

Masks are required there just walking down the sidewalk to avoid smelling feces and bums. NYC is a sister city in the amount of leftist retardment.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 1:59 am

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 12, 2022 4:00 pm Did they ever get the shit in the street thing cleared up, or are they still third worlding?

Nope. Was there a few weeks ago and the downtown hotel was doing everything they could to move the homeless along and keep the sidewalks on their block as clean as possible.

It’s really quite sad what the Bay Area has become. It has a ton of natural beauty and the liberals there just can’t get out of their own way and continue to fuck it up.

So it was clean. Way to buttfuck yourself in the mouth.

Well having been here in S.F. forever, I can set a few things straight. First, believe it or not, S.F. is not Berkeley as far as total Woke lunacy, nor Oakland as far as Corrupt Woke Lunacy. And while the alphabet Commies that comprise the S.F. Board of Supervisors do talk the talk, routinely proposing all sorts of nonsense, very little of it actually becomes law. For example, the moves to allow the homeless to stay in the locked down hotels. It never happened.

And there are three primary factors that keep S.F. from succumbing to the dystopian default feared by some and gleefully anticipated by others.

One, miraculously there are only 4% joqqers in the City. This absolute anomaly among American cities with over 100K population is due to the foresight and resolve of one man, Justin Hermann, the S.F. City Planner in the 1950's who saw the usual development of a crime-ridden cancer of a black neighborhood duly forming in S.F.'s Western Addition, a large central area, and by designing a new large boulevard (Geary) finally connecting the Sunset District with downtown, this necessitated tearing down a large swath of the nascent slum, with the residents moved to Section 8 housing. Hermann has been vilified of course by the Woke mob, including having his name stripped from the large main plaza at the Ferry Building. But he's a hero.

Two, there is a vested resolve to maintain the large and lucrative tourism industry enjoyed by S.F. Believe it or not the homeless tents are only a tiny fraction of what's occurring in San Jose and L.A. (!!!), and there are no tent cities. All of the sensational publicity of public defecation and piles of used needles and so forth are actually contained to one skid row area--admittedly inexplicable as it's right in the center of downtown, and right next to very expensive neighborhoods. In fact it used to be much worse in the 1980's when Camp Agnos was in full flower--named after the fatuous mayor who completely surrendered and allowed the entire (large) Civic Center plaza to become a permanent tent city. it was Third World. Unfucking real! But there's nothing even remotely close to that now.

Three, the power base of the Chinese in S.F. is unrivaled compared to any other city outside of China. And guess what? They really don't like joqqers, the homeless, the alphabet "community," or the whole Woke agenda. And this is complicated a bit by the fact that while the solid majority of the S.F. Chinese (just like the Vietnamese) are not Commies, there is a slithering presence of the ChiComs all over the place--and increasingly so.

So it’s OK cause they ran the Blacks out of town.

Great job 88nazzis. You censor F A T and let this shit flourish.

I doubt anyone has taken in any of these homeless.

Just more liberal do what I say, not what I do.

I raised a kid that wasn’t mine as mine so he wouldn’t be homeless, so fuck off traytorrs.

And here is a story of what actually happens when you open your home to the homeless.

You get your throat slit.

https://kutv.com/amp/news/local/utah-ho ... police-say

Nice anecdote fatman.

The Chinese disdain and disgust for joqqers long precedes the rash of brutal assaults and robberies that have somehow got a bit of coverage in the media. And while the outrageous degree of ruthless depravity displayed by the joqqers--to everyone, especially each other--would be enough to foster the Chinese disdain and disgust, it's important to bear in mind that the Han Chinese (and that's the Crazy Rich, the entire ChiCom government, etc. the main group of China) are the most racist group in the world by a good measure. Sure, the Brahmin Indians and even the Japanese of Samurai lineage, are close, but the Chinese are number one. And we won't count the Hassidic Jews because they're..you know.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 4:52 pm So it’s OK cause they ran the Blacks out of town.

Great job 88nazzis. You censor F A T and let this shit flourish.

Has it not occurred to you that every single nation, city, neighborhood, or public school district with a black majority--or even close--is in a state of desperate and depraved default? Including Africa?

Go ahead, name one that isn't.

How many cities do I need to list which were once beautiful, safe and prospering, but are now desperately dealing with rampant black violent crime?

Let's start with Detroit and Cleveland, Memphis and Baltimore, Houston and Atlanta, Philly and Oakland. Fucking Milwaukee and Cinci, built by Lutheran Germans.

What is the basis for your mewling, cawing, hissing denial and scorching venomous playground taunts?

Why can't you face the plain facts?

Two hugely racist posts and the fatman is more worried about calling me a liar.

Great job 88.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 4:36 am and by designing a new large boulevard (Geary) finally connecting the Sunset District with downtown,

I knew it. You're a fucking troll that has NEVER lived in The City.

Geary goes from the Bay to the Ocean... and goes through the Richmond District (left of Golden Gate Park in the photo) NOT the Sunset District (right of Golden Gate Park in the photo)


No San Franciscan would EVER make that mistake. EVER!







Fucking troll!

Ha ha...technically you're right about the Richmond being north of GG Park while the Sunset is south, my bad, but it's still the exact same meaning of the boulevard's purpose. And too the foresight of Justin Hermann in the effects of its construction.

And of course I've lived here--dead center on the oldest street in S.F.--for several decades. But what, you've some sort of test in mind?

Back to the subject at hand--the outrageous crisis of black violent crime across the land.

Here's a well-penned take making the case that addressing the problem itself has become a real problem. But apparently not for recent immigrants. They seem to be able to actually speak about it right out loud.

https://www.takimag.com/article/i-reall ... -like-you/

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:04 am Ha ha...technically you're right about the Richmond being north of GG Park while the Sunset is south, my bad, but it's still the exact same meaning of the boulevard's purpose.

Ummm. North and south were never in question. You saying Geary Blvd. takes you to the Sunset was. Geary Blvd. is no where near the Sunset. It goes through the Richmond District. That's on par with sayihg Coit Tower is in Oakland.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 9:14 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 1:04 am Ha ha...technically you're right about the Richmond being north of GG Park while the Sunset is south, my bad, but it's still the exact same meaning of the boulevard's purpose.

Ummm. North and south were never in question. You saying Geary Blvd. takes you to the Sunset was. Geary Blvd. is no where near the Sunset. It goes through the Richmond District. That's on par with sayihg Coit Tower is in Oakland.

You're blowing smoke out of your ass. The Richmond and the Sunset are basically identical, with just the GG Park separating them. The purpose of building Geary Blvd was to connect the "outer" community to downtown. True, folks who live below the park wouldn't drive up to Geary just to go east. There are other streets, like Sloat, Lincoln, Judah, etc.

But the point is that building Geary required demolishing a large swath of the growing black ghetto. You seem oblivious to the actual subject, and the amazing results of Justin Hermann's efforts--really unparalleled, even more than the odious Robert Moses in NYC.