Page 1 of 1

Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:45 pm
by Sven Golly
Give this a spin...

https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... fraud.html

I know it's a long read, but try to power through it you election-fraud-deniers.

Let's just hope the GOP gets a bit of the same evil in them and starts doing the same thing.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:55 pm
by FiatLux
Trumper's are a clown show.

Why not just ask Trump if the elections were a fraud?





American Thinker???



Too funny.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:57 pm
by Kierland
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:45 pm Give this a spin...

https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... fraud.html

I know it's a long read, but try to power through it you election-fraud-deniers.

Let's just hope the GOP gets a bit of the same evil in them and starts doing the same thing.
Fake news.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:02 pm
by Kierland
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:45 pm
I know it's a long read
It’s maybe 1000 words. No wonder you people are idiots if you think that is a long read. It’s a bunch of crazy buzzwords that mean nothing, but it’s not long.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:25 pm
by Sven Golly
So help me understand, is ballot chain-of-custody a buzzword you are referring to?

I know this publication makes you scratch your head, as the words American and Thinker are in the title.

At least it's more analytical than outlets like BuzzFeed, Vox, Politico, The Atlantic, WaPo, and HuffPo.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:35 pm
by Kierland
It’s literally 1/3 just questions. Like a Tucker Carlson rant.

“Floating ballots” good grief you people are stupid.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 8:19 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:25 pm ballot chain-of-custody
That's an interesting term...

Now apply it to Hunter Biden's laptop (all of them).

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:28 pm
by Sven Golly
Speaking of Hunter and the "big guy", what say you all about the influence peddling that Biden has engaged in?

How else can you explain the fortune he's built holding a public service role all his wretched life?

I guess he and the Clintons attended the same classes about how to build a fortune off of taxpayers.

Those of you who have followed Biden since he bounced himself from the primaries in '88 for plagiarism should know better. than to throw your support behind that sack of shit.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:32 pm
by Sven Golly
Jsc810 wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:27 pm
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 7:25 pm At least it's more analytical than outlets like BuzzFeed, Vox, Politico, The Atlantic, WaPo, and HuffPo.
In the aftermath of Donald Trump's loss in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, the American Thinker published a variety of articles that had claims of election fraud.[7] Faced with a lawsuit from Dominion Voting Systems, Lifson acknowledged that the site had relied upon "discredited sources who have peddled debunked theories".[8] The American Thinker likewise admitted that its election claims were "completely false and have no basis in fact" and that "it was wrong for us to publish these false statements."[9]
I didn't see those retractions, but if true, why don't we get the same courtesy from the list of biased outlets I cited? They spew BS every other day with impunity.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:41 pm
by Kierland
Whataboutism as a defense to posting fake news. You are a piece of work dude.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:44 pm
by Kierland
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:28 pm Speaking of Hunter and the "big guy", what say you all about the influence peddling that Biden has engaged in?

How else can you explain the fortune he's built holding a public service role all his wretched life?

I guess he and the Clintons attended the same classes about how to build a fortune off of taxpayers.

Those of you who have followed Biden since he bounced himself from the primaries in '88 for plagiarism should know better. than to throw your support behind that sack of shit.
What influence peddling?

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 11:07 pm
by d-townmike
Dems don't need fraud to win anymore. They just need to move to republican dominated parts of the country and turn all those areas blue.

https://notthebee.com/article/politico- ... -hellholes

Burn it the hell down.

(Sup Sven?)

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 11:23 pm
by Kierland
d-townmike wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 11:07 pm Dems don't need fraud to win anymore. They just need to move to republican dominated parts of the country and turn all those areas blue.

https://notthebee.com/article/politico- ... -hellholes

Burn it the hell down.

(Sup Sven?)
That’s called democracy and of course YOU want to burn it down because you are anti-American.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 11:35 pm
by Sven Golly
Sup d-town, glad to see I’ve got back up here.

Influence peddling should be in the Biden family cost of arms. I’m envisioning a big outstretched hand with greenbacks wafting down into the palm.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2022 11:47 pm
by Kierland
So you have no actual take, just more “he is cause I say he is” eh?

Color me shocked.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:01 am
by d-townmike
So I'm anti-American because I have morals and values?

If anything, it's the Demtwats who are anti-American.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:03 am
by Softball Bat
d-town wrote:Dems don't need fraud to win anymore. They just need to move to republican dominated parts of the country and turn all those areas blue.
Americans are free to move where they like.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:03 am
by kcdave
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:45 pm Give this a spin...

https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... fraud.html
Sven, it's been a while, but you remember how this works right?
You post an article from some horribly right slanted rag,
and then I post the link that shows how biased and often
times misleading they can be.
Same shit different day.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/
Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Dude I really would like to think that you and d-town are not a complete dumbasses.
I would like to think you have simply made the mistake of falling into
the echo chambers and reading and watching only the shit you do because
you have become brainwashed into thinking its true. Expand your horizons,
be open to listening and reading the opinions of others. I would really like
to think that there is some glimmer of hope for the both of you.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:04 am
by d-townmike
Softball Bat wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:03 am
d-town wrote:Dems don't need fraud to win anymore. They just need to move to republican dominated parts of the country and turn all those areas blue.
Americans are free to move where they like.
True but where people move to is also being more politicized.

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/18/10812953 ... -alignment

Gotta admit, I was one of those. We moved out of dominant blue Denver Metro to dominant red St. Charles County, MO. Just across the river from us is purple leaning blue St. Louis County and then there's the dominant progressive blue St. Louis City. The City and County are separate entities.

Otherwise, Missouri is a beet red state aside from STL City and County, whatever county Columbia is in (University of Missouri) and another county in the KC area.

Thing is, people are moving out of liberal hell holes like California to escape, yet these morons still vote blue in the red places they moved to and those previously red places are now blue!

Thankfully, Missouri is far more resistant to the libshit agenda.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:16 am
by Kierland
d-townmike wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:01 am So I'm anti-American because I have morals and values?

If anything, it's the Demtwats who are anti-American.
Can you fucking read? You’re antiAmerican because you hate democracy.
But I love the IKYABWAI.
What a hot mess.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:21 am
by Kierland
d-townmike wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:04 am
Softball Bat wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:03 am
d-town wrote:Dems don't need fraud to win anymore. They just need to move to republican dominated parts of the country and turn all those areas blue.
Americans are free to move where they like.
True but where people move to is also being more politicized.

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/18/10812953 ... -alignment

Gotta admit, I was one of those. We moved out of dominant blue Denver Metro to dominant red St. Charles County, MO. Just across the river from us is purple leaning blue St. Louis County and then there's the dominant progressive blue St. Louis City. The City and County are separate entities.

Otherwise, Missouri is a beet red state aside from STL City and County, whatever county Columbia is in (University of Missouri) and another county in the KC area.

Thing is, people are moving out of liberal hell holes like California to escape, yet these morons still vote blue in the red places they moved to and those previously red places are now blue!

Thankfully, Missouri is far more resistant to the libshit agenda.
So you are literally complaining about the very thing you did. You are a very dumb human, if you are even human.
People are leaving Cali cause it’s crowded and expensive and it’s expensive cause it’s desirable. Only fucktards like you are leaving because Cali cares about the gays and whatnot.

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:35 am
by Sven Golly
kcdave wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 1:03 am
Sven Golly wrote: Thu Dec 08, 2022 6:45 pm Give this a spin...

https://www.americanthinker.com/article ... fraud.html
Sven, it's been a while, but you remember how this works right?
You post an article from some horribly right slanted rag,
and then I post the link that shows how biased and often
times misleading they can be.
Same shit different day.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-thinker/
Reasoning: Conspiracy, Propaganda, Lack of Ownership Transparency, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Dude I really would like to think that you and d-town are not a complete dumbasses.
I would like to think you have simply made the mistake of falling into
the echo chambers and reading and watching only the shit you do because
you have become brainwashed into thinking its true. Expand your horizons,
be open to listening and reading the opinions of others. I would really like
to think that there is some glimmer of hope for the both of you.
I don't consider myself as being in an echo chamber, as I in fact do read articles written by folks on the left (Dowd, Krugman, now Peggy Noonan :-) )

Do you take what's written in these fish wraps as gospel?

My question is: who are the "fact" checkers? Who is monitoring WaPo, HuffPo, etc.?

Re: Still say elections have integrity?

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 2:10 am
by Kierland
Whataboutism? Dude I’m doubling down.

Sin,
Someone’s Dolly