T1B

Coin toss= HEADS

I'm still waiting for Screw_MathAgain to total up the Best Bets contest.

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:33 pm
The only thing holding Philly back, is their quarterback.
If not for that uncertainty, they'd destroy KC.

Calling it for Philly because of their QB. If his arm is well, Eagles win.

31-27 Eagles.

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:37 pm I'm still waiting for Screw_MathAgain to total up the Best Bets contest.

I'm afraid to look. Smooth sailing 2nd place with a chance to win, until champion weekend trainfukkinwreck.

Kudos to Screw and Pops.






Screwey MathAgain contemplates moving his 3BB action to Vegas.

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 4:37 pm I'm still waiting for Screw_MathAgain to total up the Best Bets contest.

Shut up Randy

Philly, with the steady plodding grind of a lawnmower. 27-17

I’m trying to figure out a way for KC to win this game. The only thing about Philly is they got an easy road to the dance with an overachieving NYG team in the divisional round and a QB plagued SF team in the conference championship.

Hurts was subpar against San Fran but he didn’t need to be great. He just needed to be effective. Philly is loaded everywhere.

Philly by 6.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Odds makers think this will be a very close game
hence the 1.5 spread. However, this board and virtually
I everyone I have listened to and read out of KC is
rolling w/ Philly and many by large point spreads.

I disagree. KC has the best coach, best tight end,
and certainly the best QB. The heady almost white
guy (paying homage to .net) will prevail in the end.
Never bet against Mahomes folks.

KC 28
Philly 24

kcdave wrote: ↑Tue Feb 07, 2023 10:42 pm best tight end,
and certainly the best QB.

Not the lengthiest of laundry lists. Dave.. don't take it too hard.


How do I fit an arrowhead in this?

Philly 34
KC 24

In the past 30 years, only 2 dummy QBs (under 24 on the Wonderlic Test) have won a Super Bowl.

Trent Dilfer, with a historically great defense.
Brett Favre, who was Brett Favre.

That's it.

And in fact, most of the Super Bowl winning QBs of the past 30 years have been fellas who scored WELL ABOVE AVERAGE on the test.


Jalen Hurts happens to be a dummy QB.
21 on the Wonderlic.

Patrick Mahomes scored average on the test (24).

This does not bode well for Jalen Hurts, so we'll see.


Don't shoot the messenger. I am just reporting the facts.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:34 am In the past 30 years, only 2 dummy QBs (under 24 on the Wonderlic Test) have won a Super Bowl.

Trent Dilfer, with a historically great defense.
Brett Favre, who was Brett Favre.

That's it.

And in fact, most of the Super Bowl winning QBs of the past 30 years have been fellas who scored WELL ABOVE AVERAGE on the test.


Jalen Hurts happens to be a dummy QB.
21 on the Wonderlic.

Patrick Mahomes scored average on the test (24).

This does not bode well for Jalen Hurts, so we'll see.


Don't shoot the messenger. I am just reporting the facts.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:34 am In the past 30 years, only 2 dummy QBs (under 24 on the Wonderlic Test) have won a Super Bowl.

Trent Dilfer, with a historically great defense.
Brett Favre, who was Brett Favre.

That's it.

And in fact, most of the Super Bowl winning QBs of the past 30 years have been fellas who scored WELL ABOVE AVERAGE on the test.


Jalen Hurts happens to be a dummy QB.
21 on the Wonderlic.

Patrick Mahomes scored average on the test (24).

This does not bode well for Jalen Hurts, so we'll see.


Don't shoot the messenger. I am just reporting the facts.

Interesting take there, pops. No really.

Because the Wonderlic test is a clear connection to the ability to win football games.

My take is the Wonderlic, in and of itself, is quite meaningless.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 5:34 am In the past 30 years, only 2 dummy QBs (under 24 on the Wonderlic Test) have won a Super Bowl.

Trent Dilfer, with a historically great defense.
Brett Favre, who was Brett Favre.

That's it.

And in fact, most of the Super Bowl winning QBs of the past 30 years have been fellas who scored WELL ABOVE AVERAGE on the test.


Jalen Hurts happens to be a dummy QB.
21 on the Wonderlic.

Patrick Mahomes scored average on the test (24).

This does not bode well for Jalen Hurts, so we'll see.


Don't shoot the messenger. I am just reporting the facts.

I have been a big believer in this theory.
The only problem is Philly's D is pretty damn stiff,
and maybe Jalen will be the next Brett Favre -
minus texting surprising small penile pics as far as we know.

Bill wrote:Because the Wonderlic test is a clear connection to the ability to win football games.

My take is the Wonderlic, in and of itself, is quite meaningless.

Well, they test the players for intelligence, just as they test them for their physical gifts.

And we have clear data that shows that the dummy QBs have not won the SB over the past 30 years -- save for Favre and Dilfer.


A few years ago we had league MVP dummy QB Cam Newton (21 on the Wonderlic -- same as J. Hurts) melt in the Super Bowl.
Shit the bed, failed to even try to recover a fumble that was right in front of him, and then stormed out of the post-game presser like he had a full diaper.
lol

So we'll see what happens this Super Sunday.

:)

Dumbasses, no matter how talented physically, can cost you games. See Pacman Jones and Vontaze Burfict.

Dumbasses, no matter how talented physically, can cost you games.

- Booger (new CBS #1 game analyst -- when Tony Romo gets canned)

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:00 am Dumbasses, no matter how talented physically, can cost you games.

- Booger (new CBS #1 game analyst -- when Tony Romo gets canned)

Was kind of interesting to see all the Romo bashing the week after the conference title games. I haven't particularly noticed his performance declining over the years. Was stunned to realize this was this *sixth* season calling games on CBS. Time flies.

Romo sucks as an analyst. His voice inflection is like he's a 5 year old kid, seeing the game of football for the first time.

I still can’t listen to him without hearing Boomer Esiason.

UBB got cha down?

Fuck you are an idiot.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 8:26 pm UBB got cha down?

Fuck you are an idiot.

I'm pretty sure this board runs on php code, not ubb. But like everyfukkingthing else I'm sure Kierland believes he's the expert.

Let me guess, you’re new here.

See? Can't admit he's wrong even when the proof is at the bottom of the page.

So that’s a yes?

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:50 pm So that’s a yes?

To what? To you struggling to read while pretending to know everyfukkenthing?

Yes, absolutely.

Question:

What’s the point of having a “flyover” when the roof is closed?

Dumb Don,
Even with the prompt in the other thread. Whoosh right over your head.

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:33 pm Dumb Don,
Even with the prompt in the other thread. Whoosh right over your head.

Okay ya got me. I have no idea what you're talking about.

Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:32 pm Question:

What’s the point of having a “flyover” when the roof is closed?

DoD probably paying the NFL under the table for the over the top displays of patriotism.

Better question. Why have the roof closed at all? It's perfect weather in AZ right now.

TMobile commercial: physically painful.

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:49 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 11:33 pm Dumb Don,
Even with the prompt in the other thread. Whoosh right over your head.

Okay ya got me. I have no idea what you're talking about.

It’s an old term we still use, like roll down the window.

Fuck you are slow.

I'm picking up on y'all slang bit by bit.

Can't believe Miller Lite took a shit on Caddyshack like that.

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:05 am Better question. Why have the roof closed at all? It's perfect weather in AZ right now.

Agreed

It is an indoor area, the roof doesn’t open. They roll the grass outside.

Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:28 am It is an indoor area, the roof doesn’t open. They roll the grass outside.

It's a modern indoor arena. The roof opens.

Took this pic as I was reading your post.


Anything else you want to be wrong about today?

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:00 am Dumbasses, no matter how talented physically, can cost you games.

- Booger (new CBS #1 game analyst -- when Tony Romo gets canned)

Gave up a dumb fumble for a TD.

You might have a point.

Oh that roof

I’ll take the L on that one.