Right subverted free speech (!)
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Right subverted free speech (!)
“Specifically, we learned, thanks to the testimony of Anika Collier Navaroli, a former member of Twitter’s content moderation team, that the White House sprang to action upon reading Teigen’s tweet. “The White House almost immediately thereafter contacted Twitter to demand the tweet be taken down. Is that accurate?” Representative Gerry Connolly asked Navaroli. “I do remember hearing we’d received a request from the White House to make sure we evaluated this tweet, and they wanted it to come down because it was a derogatory statement directed at the president,” she said.”
Rules:
Rules:
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
More proof none of you care about free speech.
And yes at least I know how to do Whataboutism correctly.
And yes at least I know how to do Whataboutism correctly.
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
I think there's a lot we can agree on in this thread.
1. Those chesticles are outstanding! On a girl that slim they are incredible. I hope she never gets an enlargement.
2. Politicians of any stripe should not influence private companies to censor individuals or businesses. It is a clear violation of law regardless of who makes the request or whom fulfills the request.
Sound good to everyone? Can we straight up codify this shit?
1. Those chesticles are outstanding! On a girl that slim they are incredible. I hope she never gets an enlargement.
2. Politicians of any stripe should not influence private companies to censor individuals or businesses. It is a clear violation of law regardless of who makes the request or whom fulfills the request.
Sound good to everyone? Can we straight up codify this shit?
Shut up, Randy!
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
You just said it was against the law, that means it has already been codified. That’s what codify means dum dum.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:41 pm I think there's a lot we can agree on in this thread.
1. Those chesticles are outstanding! On a girl that slim they are incredible. I hope she never gets an enlargement.
2. Politicians of any stripe should not influence private companies to censor individuals or businesses. It is a clear violation of law regardless of who makes the request or whom fulfills the request.
Sound good to everyone? Can we straight up codify this shit?
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
So you agree? Awesome!
Let's touch boners to make it official. *unzips*
Shut up, Randy!
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
Dude, wtf?Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:57 pmSo you agree? Awesome!
Let's touch boners to make it official. *unzips*
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
What, Squirm Worm is reduced to posting porn to entice someone, anyone, to respond to his puissy troll act?
Before God was, I am
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
Never understood how Teigen ever became a "supermodel." There's hundreds of chicks in DC itself more attractive than her.
Re: Right subverted free speech (!)
I was at a bar one time where Cathy Ireland was signing some stuff. There were 5-10 chicks from our local college there that were hotter than her including the chick I was fucking. Nature of the beast.
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm