T1B

So glad he put on his best duds for the occasion

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/m ... b-n1688175

What an utter disgrace.

What are you obsessing… I mean melting…. I mean spamming… I mean babbling on about now?

Lol, check out this douchebag's resume

Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trump, and the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama, and The Scandalous Presidency of Barack Obama.

When you said douchebag’s resume, I thought you meant Sven.

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 4:59 pm When you said douchebag’s resume, I thought you meant Sven.

Probably the same guy, indeed

He does indeed look like a fucking slob. Do you dispute that? He's not popping out to Home Depot for a couple of new bolts for his neck.

At least he’s not wearing a dress and stiletto heels.

Great - thanks for that image.

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 4:59 pm When you said douchebag’s resume, I thought you meant Sven.

Someone ought to take a gander at Shrek's resume.

Or better yet, compare some of the most elegant oratory written by our forefathers to a phrase you all know Shrek is most familiar with:

"Uh, you want lids on those?"

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 5:14 pm He does indeed look like a fucking slob. Do you dispute that? He's not popping out to Home Depot for a couple of new bolts for his neck.

Maybe he should just wear a tan suit. Do you have anything of substance?

At issue is Cave Man's complete lack of competence...this is a U.S. senator?

Yeah the no tan suit thing is a problem.

Agriculture is not even close to being Pennsylvania's largest industry.

Pennsylvania agriculture did manage to produce the world's largest potato, though, and promptly sent it to represent them in the United States Senate, so they've got that going for them.

So more appearance smack. You are killing it dude!!

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Apr 19, 2023 11:01 pm Agriculture is not even close to being Pennsylvania's largest industry.

Pennsylvania agriculture did manage to produce the world's largest potato, though, and promptly sent it to represent them in the United States Senate, so they've got that going for them.

You've been melting hard over Fetterman the last couple of days. Makes me savor even more how D voters kicked your quack TV doctor square in the nuts and how they're going to do it again to all the other GQP tards over killing women via dangerous pregnancies. 2024 is gonna be a bloodbath.

Melting? Ah...no. Just making simple observations such as the fact that Fetturdman is a stupid, brain damaged slob. That he is stupid, brain damaged and a slob is not even an opinion. It's all out there on video.

Do you disagree with that?

They're melting hard on Fetterman not only because of his political views but also because it draws attention away from the batshit crazy congressman who they had previsious censured & removed committee assignments from but have now put in a influential committee:

Jsc810 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 12:52 am And yet the voters preferred him over a trump supporter. That's how toxic the orange shitstain is.

Doc Oz was not directly supportive of Orange Man, though receiving his support had to be accepted. The elective process in Pennsyvania is a classic case of the DNC herding the black voters like sheep. And Cave Man is a simply astonishing example of lock-step obeisance to the Woke narrative and agenda. And even if he had basic mental function, his politics are his real disease.

Name one.

mvscal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 12:40 am Melting? Ah...no. Just making simple observations such as the fact that Fetturdman is a stupid, brain damaged slob. That he is stupid, brain damaged and a slob is not even an opinion. It's all out there on video.

Do you disagree with that?

Considering you have never been right once, ever….

John Fetterman has only been back one day and crushed Kevin McCarthy‘s hopes and dreams.

He destroyed McCarthy’s plans:

“Cut SNAP for families and kids while pushing tax cuts for billionaires? Not on my watch.”

Fetterman is currently chairing a subcommittee hearing and he just made it clear McCarthy’s plans will not pass in the senate.

McCarthy’s plan to cut SNAP is just like his future as Speaker of the House.

It’s dead on arrival.

Uh, SNAP isn't all that it's cracked up to be.

https://fee.org/articles/snap-the-uncom ... gLogvD_BwE

Try again...

So you are against feeding hungry people in the riches country ever. You are human (or possibly AI) garbage.

No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:20 pm No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.

They don't need to limit the amount. They need to limit what products it can buy. Basic dry and canned goods only. Beans, rice, cooking oil, powdered milk, canned vegetables and fruits etc.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:20 pm No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.

So you care more about some mismanagement than about feeding people. You literally could have said anything and you picked, “but waste”, great job.

As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:11 pm As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.

I'd rather have Other People's Money going to benefit poor and working Americans than lining the wallets of crony capitalist POS GOPers.

mvscal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:36 pm

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:20 pm No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.

They don't need to limit the amount. They need to limit what products it can buy. Basic dry and canned goods only. Beans, rice, cooking oil, powdered milk, canned vegetables and fruits etc.

Totally agree - no more junk food

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 8:40 pm

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:11 pm As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.

I'd rather have Other People's Money going to benefit poor and working Americans than lining the wallets of crony capitalist POS GOPers.

How about crony capitalist POS Leftists? You care about them making billions, fuckstick?


Start with Blackrock, JPMorgan Chase, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and let me know how far down the list you get before you find a Republican.

Hmm.. sure seems like an awful lot of people at the top of our evil capitalist system are devout Left Wingers. Why is that, do you think?

Jsc810 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 6:24 pm

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 3:18 pm Uh, SNAP isn't all that it's cracked up to be.

https://fee.org/articles/snap-the-uncom ... gLogvD_BwE

Try again...

That's 100% bullshit, and even what the article describes as fraud is not considered fraud by the USDA Food and Nutrition Service.

Go to your local food bank and volunteer one Saturday morning. Don't just write a check (although that is good to do), actually go there and look in the eyes of those receiving food assistance. You'll get a much better appreciation of the issue that way as compared to reading hack articles.

I absolutely do just that. I volunteer at food banks all the time.

Has nothing to do with terrible gubmint oversight.

God you liberal squishes with your feelings.

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 9:11 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 8:40 pm

Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:11 pm As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.

I'd rather have Other People's Money going to benefit poor and working Americans than lining the wallets of crony capitalist POS GOPers.

How about crony capitalist POS Leftists? You care about them making billions, fuckstick?


Start with Blackrock, JPMorgan Chase, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and let me know how far down the list you get before you find a Republican.

Hmm.. sure seems like an awful lot of people at the top of our evil capitalist system are devout Left Wingers. Why is that, do you think?

Yeah what about something else besides the topic!?!

Jsc810 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 6:29 pm

mvscal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:36 pm They don't need to limit the amount. They need to limit what products it can buy. Basic dry and canned goods only. Beans, rice, cooking oil, powdered milk, canned vegetables and fruits etc.

While I'm generally against restricting the food that may be purchased with SNAP, if you don't limit the amount, well that would be a potential compromise.

And I'm assuming that you are not meaning literally no limits, but rather substantially increasing the amount of benefits while restricting the types of eligible food.

I think SNAP is a worthy program, but it needs a reset to its stated purpose. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance. Key words being "supplemental" and "nutrition." By limiting it to basic, staple dry goods, canned goods and herbs and spices, you don't need to cut the benefit and it will stretch further for the individuals using it. Luxury items and junk food should not be part of the discussion. Buy those on your own dime. Including those items just inflates the cost of the program, encourages lazy, ignorant habits and does not provide nutrition.

Why not fresh produce, meat, poultry and fish?

Which part of 'supplemental' eludes your comprehension?

Every study ever conducted says that last sentence is wrong. Which makes the rest of the post your typical pedokkkal BS.

mvscal wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 2:32 am Which part of 'supplemental' eludes your comprehension?

I know what “supplemental” means. How does it exclude all of those items? Seems like a matter of semantics. You yourself described the canned and dried shelf-stable goods as basic staples. That would make fresh produce and proteins supplemental.

Which part of “staples” eludes your comprehension?

You might want to try and be consistent.

Forgive him, he doesn’t know much about tomatoes.

Mikey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 3:55 am I know what “supplemental” means. How does it exclude all of those items? Seems like a matter of semantics. You yourself described the canned and dried shelf-stable goods as basic staples. That would make fresh produce and proteins supplemental.

Which part of “staples” eludes your comprehension?

You might want to try and be consistent.

C'mon, you've been posting here long enough to know mvscunt believes the poor don't deserve such nutritional staples such as meat, poultry or fish. If they want those luxuries, god damn it, they should get an education or some fucking skills.