T1B

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:02 pm

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

Why don’t you?

FiatLux wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 3:58 pm

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

I'll play.


Biden: I'm not a fat pig about to go to jail and don't need to pay porn stars to sleep with me.


Ok. Do it with Trump.

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 5:30 pm

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 2:02 pm

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

Why don’t you?

I'm waiting for the MSM to do it.

Oh wait.

they never found the body because there used to be a lot of cannibals, for real, in that part of New Guinea.

I don’t know why we’re surprised by Trump.

How many times does he have to prove we can't be trusted?

Carson wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 5:10 pm

I don’t know why we’re surprised by Trump.

How many times does he have to prove we can't be trusted?

#stupidfuckwitbiden

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm lefties have pro hamas rallies

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:00 pm

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm lefties have pro hamas rallies

Seer's brain obviously malfunctioning again

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm Kind of like m2 posting in here about how maga & Trump suck

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 am

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm Kind of like m2 posting in here about how maga & Trump suck

They do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.

Nothing more sucky than that.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:00 pm

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm lefties have pro hamas rallies

Seer's brain obviously malfunctioning again

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 am

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm Kind of like m2 posting in here about how maga & Trump suck

They do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.

Nothing more sucky than that.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 3:58 pm

Carson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2024 7:52 am Haha now do it with anything Biden says.

I'll play.


Biden: I'm not a fat pig about to go to jail and don't need to pay porn stars to sleep with me.


Ok. Do it with Trump.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:17 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 am

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 2:24 pm Kind of like m2 posting in here about how maga & Trump suck

They do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.

Nothing more sucky than that.

I know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.

All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.

Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:54 pm

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:17 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 am

They do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.

Nothing more sucky than that.

I know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.

All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.

Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.

Spot on - well said HPG

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.

Meat Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:24 pm Clarence Thomas was shown to be bought and paid for. Did the chief or any of the other judges do anything but ignore it? Some bullshit generalized press release but no statement of ethics or sanctions.

Corrupt? Fuk what else do you need?

Meat Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:24 pm Clarence Thomas was shown to be bought and paid for. Did the chief or any of the other judges do anything but ignore it? Some bullshit generalized press release but no statement of ethics or sanctions.

Corrupt? Fuk what else do you need?

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:30 pm

Meat Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:24 pm Clarence Thomas was shown to be bought and paid for. Did the chief or any of the other judges do anything but ignore it? Some bullshit generalized press release but no statement of ethics or sanctions.

Corrupt? Fuk what else do you need?

The last eight years has shown the weaponization of the very government against president trump, starting with the Obama justice department that literally used unverified BS propaganda to take down the DULY ELECTED president trump. James Comey then set in motion the BS Mueller investigation run by leftist friend of Hillary Clinton Andrew Weissman himself! Spending millions upon millions of the tax payers money on complete and utter BS.
And your only concern is propaganda about Thomas?

Meat Head wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:24 pm Clarence Thomas was shown to be bought and paid for. Did the chief or any of the other judges do anything but ignore it? Some bullshit generalized press release but no statement of ethics or sanctions.

Corrupt? Fuk what else do you need?

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:54 pm

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:17 pm
I know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.

All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.

Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.

Spot on - well said HPG

Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.

On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:54 pm

Spot on - well said HPG

Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.

Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.

Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.

NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.

On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.

Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.

And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:26 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm

Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.

Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.

Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.

NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.

On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.

Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.

And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.

Quote, "self-reported'l"


Are you a pathological liar?
He's had classified documents going back over a decade.


Simpletons regurgitate the BS propaganda fed to them daily, which is what you just did.

A senator, a vice president, etc......
Being in possession of classified documents in multiple unsecured locations, including an unlocked garage, should face serious felony charges.
He's been in possession of these documents for a long time, without self reporting anything.

Understand?

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:54 pm

Spot on - well said HPG

Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.

Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.

Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.

NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.

On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.

Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.

And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:30 am

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:26 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm

Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.

Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.

NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.


Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.

And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.

Quote, "self-reported'l"


Are you a pathological liar?
He's had classified documents going back over a decade.


Simpletons regurgitate the BS propaganda fed to them daily, which is what you just did.

A senator, a vice president, etc......
Being in possession of classified documents in multiple unsecured locations, including an unlocked garage, should face serious felony charges.
He's been in possession of these documents for a long time, without self reporting anything.

Understand?

The difference is that:

1) NARA never contacted Biden regarding the mission documents, and

2) Biden voluntarily gave up all discovered documents.

Get it, nimrod?

I'm sure that you don't.

Try googling mens rea, idiot.

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:35 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm

Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.

Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.

Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.

NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.

On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.

Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.

And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.

Nice fantasy.

The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 am

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:35 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm

Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.

Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.

NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.


Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.

And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.

Nice fantasy.

The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.

In the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."

Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:04 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 am

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:35 am

Nice fantasy.

The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.

In the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."

Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?

Now you're getting real Nit-picky

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:07 am

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:04 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 am

In the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."

Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?

Now you're getting real Nit-picky

Falsifying business records is....Nit-picky?

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:58 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:07 am

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:04 am

Now you're getting real Nit-picky

Falsifying business records is....Nit-picky?

Here's what you need to know.
First, according to every single person doing business in New York, president trump should NEVER have been charged. It's a political witch hunt that Bragg is conducting here.
Obviously, they got a hostile jury of democrats, HOWEVER, trump's "ace in the hole" are the two lawyers on the jury who are familiar with what Bragg is trying to do.

We saw Fani Willis and her punk boyfriend commit perjury. ALL part of the biggest political witch hunt in our nation's history.

You claim everyone is turning against president trump? You must be watching NPR. 24/7.
Because all the current polling suggests that president trump has increased his support from 2020 across every demographic.

INCLUDING minorities and the suburban areas.

Another perfect storm is coming this November.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:06 am

JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:58 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:07 am


Falsifying business records is....Nit-picky?

Here's what you need to know.
First, according to every single person doing business in New York, president trump should NEVER have been charged. It's a political witch hunt that Bragg is conducting here.
Obviously, they got a hostile jury of democrats, HOWEVER, trump's "ace in the hole" are the two lawyers on the jury who are familiar with what Bragg is trying to do.

We saw Fani Willis and her punk boyfriend commit perjury. ALL part of the biggest political witch hunt in our nation's history.

You claim everyone is turning against president trump? You must be watching NPR. 24/7.
Because all the current polling suggests that president trump has increased his support from 2020 across every demographic.

INCLUDING minorities and the suburban areas.

Another perfect storm is coming this November.

You must not have been paying attention when jury selection was going on. Lots of potential jurors indicated that they didn't like him.