T1B

We hardly knew ye.

She will be "Willie Horten'ed" in due time.

https://revolver.news/2024/07/newly-unc ... -campaign/

Strange how the internet can record one's misdeeds.

Wow. That deserves a huge RACK.






Biggest nothingburger of 2024.

As a thought experiment, consider if that was trump instead of Harris.

Would that cause any drop in support for trump?

No?

Guess what, it won't cause any drop for Harris either.

The truth is, there is no "surge in the polls" for her. They are completely manufactured by the media, as are the supposed new poll numbers.

Nothing has changed, and the average voter - and most of all - the independent swing voter - still knows her for what she is.

She has the brain power of an amoeba.

Trump has a solid track record.

Harris will be downright dangerous.

And if you believe she isn't, I feel sorry for you.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:43 pm Trump has a solid track record.

Insert trump crimes, frauds, and misdeeds here.

Harris's platitudes and "hopey changey" bullshit will get her only so far.

She's a zero. And the average voter knows it.

People want results, and Trump delivered when he was POTUS.

And if you say otherwise, you're delusional, and living in an alternate universe.

She is an awful candidate.

The Dims have been giddy because their back-up QB has been inserted, but reality will soon slap them across the face.

This is why I believe Harris will end up being replaced somehow.


When the economy is trash, people will vote the incumbent -----> OUT.

That's gonna be the bottom line -- unless some other craziness happens between now and November 5th, which is certainly possible.

The people who know him best, his own Vice President, and 40 out of 44 of his Cabinet members, do not support him.

You are in a cult. Wake the fuck up.

SG, you are even deeper in the cult now than you were at .net. Can't wait to see you melt in November when she wins, and you start spewing all of your "the election was rigged," bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Normal Americans will overwhelmingly reject fascism and they'll overwhelmingly reject the creepy, weird fukks who populate Dump's GQP.

SG, if you think anything will cost Harris a single vote I’m sorry to tell you…you’re mistaken.

I have found that her supporters are totally oblivious to all of the material out there for at least the last three years where she displays the knowledge of a 10 year old at best.

They’re going to vote for her. They don’t care that she’s a total ditz who will endanger every US citizen.

It's comical to think that the convicted felon and the hillbilly cult can compete with the San Francisco intellectuals and power players.

The convicted felon has a better chance of not lying for 60 straight seconds then beating someone from San Francisco Bay area.

Just a heads up... Me and the other power players here in The City spent the last weekend rigging the election.

You hillbillies are fucked.

Which one of you members of the white trash party are going to visit the convicted felon in jail after the election?

Probably half the country or more likes that about her, SG. So many were so outraged by the cops that her words and activity are not controversial. For them, it's not a bug, it's a feature. I

FiatLux wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:15 pm Me and the other power players here in The City spent the last weekend rigging the election.

You delusional fuck. You live in a $2,000 per month one room, shared bathroom, shared refrigerator 2nd floor dump in Noe Valley.

And your power players are just your merry little band of male ass fukkers.

Oh yeah and I noticed that while she's been the author of certain instances of faux pas ("a friend in need" "venn diagrams") she's clear as a bell about matters in the link you provided, so I'm sure her campaign knows about her wheelhouse, and you can bet there is more of that to come. And it will not hurt her with voters who foresee another term for Trump as the greatest possible train-wreck of evil.

Roux wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:35 pm As a thought experiment, consider if that was trump instead of Harris.

As a thought experiment, consider that Whoreiss did not get a single delegate in her run for office. She is an expendable loser.

See you in 28. Good luck getting your shit together.

Kamala is the perfect DNC candidate.

She was raised in Canada by self-identified Marxist immigrants. She views America as a thing to be fixed, rather than a legacy to be heralded. She has no attachment to this country. Why would she?

She is intellectually vapid and morally vacuous. With no moral foundation or ability to form a unique thought, she is the perfect mouthpiece for the DNC. She will never suffer an attack of conscious and confront the totalitarian oligarchs on the Left.

She knows where her power comes from. She has never ascended in her career without the permission and assistance of a man. From Willie Brown and Doug Imhoff, to Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer, she owes the right kinds of people the right kinds of favors. You don't get to be a Democrat politician on a national stage unless the Party can control you. You think the DNC lets any old aspiring leader make it to the big show? Nigerian, please. Her ancestors were slave owners, for fuck's sake. If she steps out of line her career is over in a week and she knows it. She'll play ball. Systems are resilient.

But...she is not unique. The DNC has lots of controllable puppets in queue so if she doesn't poll well, she'll be replaced. If she is allowed to pick a VP it'll be Bootyjuice. He checks diversity boxes and he owes the right kinds of people the right kinds of favors. Both of them can be controlled and that is the Party's first priority.

The hillbillies are shitty their pants again.

This is the kinda shit they believe when they listen to far-right wing nutjobs on the radio and get their thought programming. Do you hillbillies have TV's ? Guess I'll have to watch that hillbilly movie about the cult's homosexual VP and find out.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:14 am Kamala is the perfect DNC candidate.

She was raised in Canada by self-identified Marxist immigrants. She views America as a thing to be fixed, rather than a legacy to be heralded. She has no attachment to this country. Why would she?

Let me help you hillbillies out with the truth.

She was born in the San Francisco Bay Area (Oakland, CA.)

She was raised in Oakland/Berkeley.

She lived a couple of years in Illinois as a kid when her parents taught at some colleges in the Midwest.

She then moved back to Oakland/Berkeley where she grew up. She left as a teenager to go to high school in Canada and then moved back to the states to go to college and live.


The hillbilly cult is running scared.

Which is it?

Is she a San Francisco liberal... or is she a Canadian liberal?



Too funny.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 6:15 am
Which is it?

Is she a San Francisco liberal... or is she a Canadian liberal?

She's a liberal cunt.

Now, get back to watching those security monitors.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:21 pmStrange how the internet can record one's misdeeds.

Yeah. And speaking of defending police




Btw, what Harris told the New York Times was that she agreed with the idea of assessing “what public safety looks like” and the size of police budgets, “but, no, we’re not going to get rid of the police. We all have to be practical.”

The campaign will get worse for trump. maga is a dead man walking.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:14 am She is intellectually vapid and morally vacuous

Dump supporters calling anyone else intellectually vapid and morally vacuous is rich.

HPG wrote:She was raised in Canada by self-identified Marxist immigrants. She views America as a thing to be fixed, rather than a legacy to be heralded. She has no attachment to this country. Why would she?

Exactly why the natural born citizen requirement was placed in the constitution.

mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:31 am

Roux wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:35 pm As a thought experiment, consider if that was trump instead of Harris.

As a thought experiment, consider that Whoreiss

Supporter of the guy who has cheated on ALL THREE OF HIS WIVES (including while the current one was pregnant with his child) says what?

The Deflecting and Whatabouting in this thread is almost deafening.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 3:18 pm The Deflecting and Whatabouting in this thread is almost deafening.

Your hypocrisy is overwhelming.

The grasping at straws by maga is funny to witness. Y'all won't admit it of course, but deep inside you know that trump is defeated and Harris is your next President.

The first step in recovery is realizing that you're in a cult. I wish you well.

"deep inside" ???
You're joking. Unless you have inside information on how they will rig the election.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:14 am
She knows where her power comes from. She has never ascended in her career without the permission and assistance of a man. From Willie Brown and Doug Imhoff, to Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer, she owes the right kinds of people the right kinds of favors. You don't get to be a Democrat politician on a national stage unless the Party can control you. You think the DNC lets any old aspiring leader make it to the big show?

Most successful people had mentors on the way up. Family members and friends, teachers, professors, clergy ('sup pedophile MAGAs?), friends and colleagues, and others higher up on the ladder. I believe that, in politics, this applies to both sides of the aisle? Even your orange demigod. So, what you're saying here is that as a woman she is only allowed to have female mentors? Please.

Oh yeah, and according to you she probably walks funny through the airport.

So, racist AND sexist. Dude, you are fucking weird, just like the rest of your mentally and sexually perverted MAGA cohort.

Roux wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 3:29 pm you know that trump is defeated and Harris is your next President.

You're delusional.

Maybe that is an issue that can be discussed at the debate.

trump will show up to debate, won't he?

Yeah...WHATABOUT the debate.



deafening

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:29 pm Yeah...WHATABOUT the debate.



deafening

Weak

Wolfman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 3:50 pm "deep inside" ???
You're joking. Unless you have inside information on how they will rig the election.

What is it with Trumpers and reading comprehension? Just a few posts up.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:15 pm Just a heads up... Me and the other power players here in The City spent the last weekend rigging the election.

You hillbillies are fucked.

Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:09 pm

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:14 am
She knows where her power comes from. She has never ascended in her career without the permission and assistance of a man. From Willie Brown and Doug Imhoff, to Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer, she owes the right kinds of people the right kinds of favors. You don't get to be a Democrat politician on a national stage unless the Party can control you. You think the DNC lets any old aspiring leader make it to the big show?

Most successful people had mentors on the way up. Family members and friends, teachers, professors, clergy ('sup pedophile MAGAs?), friends and colleagues, and others higher up on the ladder. I believe that, in politics, this applies to both sides of the aisle? Even your orange demigod. So, what you're saying here is that as a woman she is only allowed to have female mentors? Please.

It's in line with his (and the rest of the MAGAts) that women who have sexual relationships are whores but men who sleep around are studs.

#Hypocrisy
#Misogyny

Roux wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:27 pm Maybe that is an issue that can be discussed at the debate.

trump will show up to debate, won't he?

Why wouldn't he? Showed for the last one. His take on the outcome of the previous debate probably is that he won, because his opponent had to leave the race, and therefore he has bode, and he's a stable genius with oratory skillz that rival Cicero's.

Even though his "victory" was by default.

Roux wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:27 pm trump will show up to debate, won't he?

Not a chance. He's not going up against Uncle Joe this time.


San Francisco Prosecutor vs. Convicted Felon.


He'd get ripped a new asshole and they would be scrambling to find Little Marco with a couple months to go.

Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:09 pm Most successful people had mentors on the way up. Family members and friends, teachers, professors, clergy ('sup pedophile MAGAs?), friends and colleagues, and others higher up on the ladder. I believe that, in politics, this applies to both sides of the aisle? Even your orange demigod. So, what you're saying here is that as a woman she is only allowed to have female mentors? Please.

Your candidate, when asked about a policy position, restructures the same five words into four different sentences while managing to say absolutely nothing. Every time. She does it constantly. Because she knows she's unqualified. She's been a bullshitter since she struggled to pass the Bar Exam and hasn't yet been denied a job because of incompetence so there's no reason for her to try hard. She leveraged her only two qualifications (skin color, and genitalia) <---notice I did not say ethnicity since that changes depending on the campaign event-- into an upward mobility that far exceeds her natural gifts or her education. She slurped, splayed, and laid her way in and out of every job she ever had but that's okay because...*checks notes*... Donald Trump got a construction loan.

The deflections are still deafening in here.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 5:11 pm

Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 4:09 pm Most successful people had mentors on the way up. Family members and friends, teachers, professors, clergy ('sup pedophile MAGAs?), friends and colleagues, and others higher up on the ladder. I believe that, in politics, this applies to both sides of the aisle? Even your orange demigod. So, what you're saying here is that as a woman she is only allowed to have female mentors? Please.

Your candidate, when asked about a policy position, restructures the same five words into four different sentences while managing to say absolutely nothing. Every time. She does it constantly. Because she knows she's unqualified. She's been a bullshitter since she struggled to pass the Bar Exam and hasn't yet been denied a job because of incompetence so there's no reason for her to try hard. She leveraged her only two qualifications (skin color, and genitalia) <---notice I did not say ethnicity since that changes depending on the campaign event-- into an upward mobility that far exceeds her natural gifts or her education. She slurped, splayed, and laid her way in and out of every job she ever had but that's okay because...*checks notes*... Donald Trump got a construction loan.

The deflections are still deafening in here.

Flailing word salad. Thanks for proving my point.

JPG is your troll?

Mikey also seems to be confused about the history of DJT's ascent into politics. Mikey seems to think Trump was coached and favored. Not so. In 2016, the RNC wanted to crown Jeb Bush, remember?. It was Jeb's "turn" because he traded favors with all the right people and created an upward trajectory over a 30 year career. The RNC hated Trump. Reince Priebus withheld party support until it became politically obvious and personally advantageous for him to board the Trump Train.

Trump was the outsider in 2016 and he still is. That's why ensconced bureaucrats are so afraid of him.

Kamala, on the other hand, is a creation of the system. We are being sold a fugazi, a caricature of a human. The Left can't see it because they've been sold fake humans for decades and they're accustomed to it. The right couldn't see their fakes until Trump. Romney, McCain, Jeb...all creations of the system. Donald Trump is the most real thing in politics. If you don't support him, you accept your fate as grist for a mill that doesn't care about you.

Roux wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2024 11:41 am

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:21 pmStrange how the internet can record one's misdeeds.

Yeah. And speaking of defending police




Btw, what Harris told the New York Times was that she agreed with the idea of assessing “what public safety looks like” and the size of police budgets, “but, no, we’re not going to get rid of the police. We all have to be practical.”

The campaign will get worse for trump. maga is a dead man walking.

Are you f-cking kidding? You're equating FBI with law enforcement??

The head of that agency testifies that he wasn't sure that Trump was hit by a bullet, and shortly after, his own department comes out with a statement saying the opposite.

God you are delusional...