T1B

Posted: **Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:48 pm**

Giddens and Bill Self have "mutually agreed" that it would be best for both parties to get off to a "fresh start".

About fuckin' time. Giddens turned into a bigger choke artist from the three-point stripe than Billy Thomas had ever dreamed of being, and was starting to look like Mizzou material with his off-season antics.

I'd be all for the NCAA lifting the penalty that would force him to lose a year of elgibility if he decided to commit to another Big XII team... just so, at least twice a year for the next two years, I could watch Bill Self go John Chaney on Giddens' punk-ass by sending in a goon to plant multiple elbows in Giddens' grill, and leave his dumb ass laid out like kcdave after wifey gets done hitting off the tee.

Posted: **Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:16 pm**

Just to get it out of the way...

NO we do not want him in Norman. Send his ass to Stillwater, he'll fit right in there.

Posted: **Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:34 pm**

look like Mizzou material with his off-season antics.

:cry:

I remember when people use to say that about Cornhusker football.

Posted: **Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:39 pm**

I want to go on the record as being in complete agreement with Giddens "decision to transfer".

However, I have a couple of thoughts:

1 - If he had a better or year or was thought of as a better player, most Kansas alums wouldn't have been so in favor of his "transfer

".

2 - I think this incident has been blown way out of proportion.....it was bar fight for Christ's sake, nothing more, nothing less. This happens 6,000 times every weekend at every college town in America...and probably everywhere else in the world.

Like I said though, I'm glad he's gone. It'll be good for him and good for KU.

Posted: **Sat Jul 02, 2005 4:22 am**

Mook wrote:1 - If he had a better or year or was thought of as a better player, most Kansas alums wouldn't have been so in favor of his "transfer ".

He would have had a better year if he would have been focusing more on his game preparation, and not trying to be a "gangsta". I'd be much more sympathetic to his plight if his game suffered due to him devoting every available moment to studying & graduating, but in Giddens' case, he was concerned more with being a cancer to the team and a general fuck-off away from the court.

2 - I think this incident has been blown way out of proportion.....it was bar fight for Christ's sake, nothing more, nothing less. This happens 6,000 times every weekend at every college town in America...and probably everywhere else in the world.

See previous rebuttal. He and his gangsta buds decided to go Icy Hot Stuntaz on some schmuck at Moon Bar, and said schmuck wound up scoring 'bode on them in return with a knife.

Posted: **Sat Jul 02, 2005 2:50 pm**

Mook wrote:I want to go on the record as being in complete agreement with Giddens "decision to transfer".

However, I have a couple of thoughts:

1 - If he had a better or year or was thought of as a better player, most Kansas alums wouldn't have been so in favor of his "transfer ".

2 - I think this incident has been blown way out of proportion.....it was bar fight for Christ's sake, nothing more, nothing less. This happens 6,000 times every weekend at every college town in America...and probably everywhere else in the world.

Like I said though, I'm glad he's gone. It'll be good for him and good for KU.

Is there any criminal act this kid won't commit though? Robs Wal-Mart , gets stabbed, ect.?

Kid is just as likely to serve time as he is to serve in the NBA.

Posted: **Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:33 pm**

SunCoastSooner wrote:Kid is just as likely to serve time as he is to serve in the NBA.

The only thing he'll be serving in the NBA is Gatorade in a cup.

Posted: **Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:30 pm**

I'm not in any way defending Giddens.....he got and will continue to get just what he deserves.

All I said was if he was a better on court talent, he'd still be playing next year in Allen.

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:34 am**

JHawkBCD wrote:...was starting to look like Mizzou material with his off-season antics.

Glass houses much?

Giddens is a punk, just like you Bill.

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:20 am**

War Wagon wrote:
JHawkBCD wrote:...was starting to look like Mizzou material with his off-season antics.
Glass houses much?

Giddens is a punk, just like you Bill.

And that would make you "punked". Thousands of times over.

Enjoy your underacheiving, malcontent group of turds you call a college basketball team as the set new lows in Columbia this year.

Let the Quin Snyder deathwatch roll on...

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:06 am**

With Kleiza gone they might actually be a team.

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:14 am**

JHawkBCD wrote: Enjoy your underacheiving, malcontent group of turds you call a college basketball team as the set new lows in Columbia this year.

Let the Quin Snyder deathwatch roll on...

Betcha they punk KU, though, and finish better in the conference.

You want some of this?

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:28 pm**

War Wagon wrote:
JHawkBCD wrote: Enjoy your underacheiving, malcontent group of turds you call a college basketball team as the set new lows in Columbia this year.

Let the Quin Snyder deathwatch roll on...
Betcha they punk KU, though, and finish better in the conference.

You want some of this?

Another bet, eh? When are you ever going to learn?

We'll just leave this as a year-long sig & avatar bet. If KU scores more total points than your Pussies in the two regular season games they play, you're wearing the avatar and sig of my choice for one year, and I will suffer the same consequence if KU fails to score more points.

We can even go double-or-nothing on the bet if they meet up again in the Big XII tourney.

You game, Gomer?

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:20 pm**

more points? that's weak. it's all about the W or L.

if Jayhawk and Captain Toupee are so tough, take the bet win or loss in Columbia.

where they will "be setting new lows".

Posted: **Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:39 pm**

Points? You want to bet on total points scored?

MU-WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Stop it, you're killing me! What kind of lame-ass bet is that?

I guess even you realize how bare the Gayhawk cupboard is this upcoming season.

Man up and take the bet I offered...best conference record. If they somehow manage to tie, we'll use total points scored home and home as a tiebreaker.

And I'm not betting some worthless sig or avatar as stakes. I want this to hit you where it hurts...in that gay-ass belt pouch and change purse you probably tote around.

Put up or shut up.

An even $50 sounds about right.

Posted: **Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:53 am**

War Wagon wrote:Points? You want to bet on total points scored?

That's called a tiebreaker, you ignorant douche. Edge goes to whoever humiliated the other team more.

MU-WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Stop it, you're killing me! What kind of lame-ass bet is that?

I guess even you realize how bare the Gayhawk cupboard is this upcoming season.

Man up and take the bet I offered...best conference record. If they somehow manage to tie, we'll use total points scored home and home as a tiebreaker.

Tomato, to-mah-toe, who gives a fuck... why over-complicate it? That's essentially the same as what I'm suggesting.

And I'm not betting some worthless sig or avatar as stakes. I want this to hit you where it hurts...in that gay-ass belt pouch and change purse you probably tote around.

Put up or shut up.

An even $50 sounds about right.

Bitch, I wouldn't feel right about making you have to cash out your 401K just to pay off the debt. Besides, winning money on that bet doesn't mean shit to me. Making you look like a putz on this message board for yet another year... now THAT sounds like great fun.

Posted: **Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:03 am**

Jhawk admits he will lose in Columbia. that's what's funny.

"Tiebreaker".

Posted: **Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:26 am**

That's far from being an admission of anything, you fucking retard.

Both teams could quite easily lose home games and split the season series, if luck would have it.

If I see you down in Bricktown tonight, I will fight you.

Posted: **Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:05 am**

So, this means that you are pussing out on the reasonable bet that I offered.

Understandable, and not all that surprising.

JHawkBCD, the mouse that roared.

Just put that in your sig.

Posted: **Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:07 pm**

War Wagon wrote:So, this means that you are pussing out on the reasonable bet that I offered.

Understandable, and not all that surprising.

JHawkBCD, the mouse that roared.

Just put that in your sig.

No, that means that I'd gladly give up the chance to win $50 just to hang humiliation on you for a whole year.

Pretty clear as to who the pussy is now, Pussy Wagon.

Posted: **Sat Jul 09, 2005 3:37 am**

^^^Not able to differentiate fantasy from reality.

You think you can "humiliate" someone on an IBB?

You need some help.

Posted: **Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:09 am**

Judging from the self-humiliating shit that you've posted on these forums with the intent to whore for attention, only to have it used against you in repetitive brutal plunger rapings, I'm surprised that you, of all people, would feel that way.

Rack you, Raymond Babbitt Wagon.

Posted: **Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:33 am**

JHawkBCD wrote:Judging from the self-humiliating shit that you've posted on these forums with the intent to whore for attention, only to have it used against you in repetitive brutal plunger rapings, I'm surprised that you, of all people, would feel that way.

I don't whore for attention, and I don't self humiliate...that's a contradiction.

Brutal plunger rapings? Never felt a thing.

Again, you need to learn to discern the difference between fantasy and reality.

The IRS and Missouri dept of revenue can deliver a brutal plunger raping.

You, my misguided friend, can not.

Keep on trying, though. I need this bit of comic relief now and then.

Posted: **Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:47 pm**

War Wagon wrote:Brutal plunger rapings? Never felt a thing.

Cue the Blondiebabe "Hot Dog Down The Hallway" resets.

Posted: **Sun Jul 10, 2005 4:51 pm**

JHawkBCD wrote:fucking retard.

T1B

Good riddens, Giddens

Good riddens, Giddens

Re: Good riddens, Giddens

Re: Good riddens, Giddens

Re: Good riddens, Giddens

Re: Good riddens, Giddens