T1B

Finally. Leprechan blood on our uni's....

I hope they are coming to your house first.

Would ND have two games in LA in the same year? Which one is at the Rose Bowl?

SunCoastSooner wrote:I hope they are coming to your house first.

no kidding.

King Crimson wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:I hope they are coming to your house first.

no kidding.

3uRdZ

Jimmy Medalions wrote:Would ND have two games in LA in the same year? Which one is at the Rose Bowl?

2007

The Seer wrote:

Jimmy Medalions wrote:Would ND have two games in LA in the same year? Which one is at the Rose Bowl?

2007

Who wants to make odds on them not buying out if the game in South Bend is even competitive?

SunCoastSooner wrote:

The Seer wrote:

Jimmy Medalions wrote:Would ND have two games in LA in the same year? Which one is at the Rose Bowl?

2007

Who wants to make odds on them not buying out if the game in South Bend is even competitive?

I've read that sober and drunk and still can't figure out what you want.

Try English.

The Seer wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:

The Seer wrote:
2007

Who wants to make odds on them not buying out if the game in South Bend is even competitive?

I've read that sober and drunk and still can't figure out what you want.

Try English.

Who - The person or persons that; whoever.

make - To achieve, produce, or attain.

them - The objective case of they.

buying - To acquire in exchange for money or its equivalent; purchase.

competitive - Of, involving, or determined by competition.

If I were speaking I would do it slowly so you might be able to comprehend; if UCLA gives Notre Dame a competitive game in South Bend I have serious doubts to wheather or not they will be in Los Angeles to face UCLA the next year.

SunCoastSooner wrote: If I were speaking I would do it slowly so you might be able to comprehend; if UCLA gives Notre Dame a competitive game in South Bend I have serious doubts to wheather or not they will be in Los Angeles to face UCLA the next year.

Bullshit. They will play that game, regardless. The only game they have changed was the Miami (OH) game to start the season in '97 to get Ga. Tech for the re-dedication game.

And I would assume that UCLA would replace Stanford on the schedule those two years and it would work (re: SC) the same way as it does now.

Killian wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote: If I were speaking I would do it slowly so you might be able to comprehend; if UCLA gives Notre Dame a competitive game in South Bend I have serious doubts to wheather or not they will be in Los Angeles to face UCLA the next year.

Bullshit. They will play that game, regardless.

So says the Notre Dame fan. Forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt. ;)

I'll be at the Rose Bowl....seer...maybe we can play golf the day before?

SunCoastSooner wrote:So says the Notre Dame fan. Forgive me if I take your opinion with a grain of salt. ;)

We've had this debate before. A return game wasn't scheduled with Oklahoma and if it was and ND cancled, for any reason, there is no press release that I can find from Notre Dame, nor you can find from Oklahoma. I don't think ND was ducking anyone at that time. They played Nebraska at home the next year. So the thought that they bought out Oklahoma because they were afraid to play them is simply wrong.

Laxplayer wrote:I'll be at the Rose Bowl....seer...maybe we can play golf the day before?

Y knot?

Ok, maybe we can set this up sooner.....I just got asked to be the girls golf coach at Golden Valley.......

Laxplayer wrote:Ok, maybe we can set this up sooner.....I just got asked to be the girls golf coach at Golden Valley.......

If that's humor, strange.

If that's true, stranger.

Enough type. Let's play.

No, I'm serious. Now get this...it's going to be in the Daily News soon in Gerry Gittleson's column. I'm doing the color commentary for the local radio station for the high school game of the week. Quit laughing.