T1B

The Venetian still has us at 75 to 1. $20 pays $1520.

Go BEARS!!!



m2

Kal winning the NC.



*cough, snort*

m2 wrote:The Venetian still has us at 75 to 1. $20 pays $1520.

Go BEARS!!!



m2

There's a reason for that.

They probably didn't even post odds for Nebraska in fear of the ticket-taker shitting herself if somebody was dumb enough to actually make the bet. But hey, at least we should have a winning season this year.

As far as Cal goes I guess anything could happen. They did beat USC the last time at Berkeley and Leinert could always get hurt. Oregon is the only other team on their sched expected to be very good. But they would have to still beat a top-quality team in the championship. I think Cal will have to wait til 06 to contend, then they'll have many more starters back and USC won't have Leinert or Bush.

I wouldn't place a bet on Cal if I was getting 75-1 odds on them winning even 9 games this year.

Danimal wrote:They probably didn't even post odds for Nebraska in fear of the ticket-taker shitting herself if somebody was dumb enough to actually make the bet. But hey, at least we should have a winning season this year.

As far as Cal goes I guess anything could happen. They did beat USC the last time at Berkeley and Leinert could always get hurt. UCLA is the only other team on their sched expected to be very good. But they would have to still beat a top-quality team in the championship. I think Cal will have to wait til 06 to contend, then they'll have many more starters back and USC won't have Leinert or Bush.

FTFYNC

Looks like easy money to me.

Bet everything you got on it, m2. Yes even the wind chimes.

I only wish FSU could ever get those kinda odds...

:roll:

Vegas knows how to reel in the suckers.

Maybe Cal can go to another bowl and get absolutely destroyed by the fifth best team in the Big 12.

The Big 12 spouting off at the Pac 10? After Okla. & SC? Your memory is as short as your dick.

The Seer wrote:The Big 12 spouting off at the Pac 10? After Okla. & SC? Your memory is as short as your dick.

Taco Tech vs. Cal... end of story, thanks for playing see you next time you make an ass of yourself ;) :D

I'm priming you honks.....19 days to go..... :twisted:

SunCoastSooner wrote:

The Seer wrote:The Big 12 spouting off at the Pac 10? After Okla. & SC? Your memory is as short as your dick.

Taco Tech vs. Cal... end of story, thanks for playing see you next time you make an ass of yourself ;) :D

Hmmmm,

Cal is the last team to beat the Toejams...

Last year when they lost to $C, they had triple the total offense of $C, had triple the 1st downs, and had triple the time with the ball.

They flat out dominated $C last year... the year $C beat you by 95 points or something...

You need to remember, Cal was booted from BCS by the good ole' boy network in the south...

How motivated would OU be, as the #4 team in the country, and then you have to play in the Holiday Bowl...

I don't think OU would have been to pumped to play that game, if they were screwed.

The only team that can beat $C, is Cal...


m2

m2 wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:

The Seer wrote:The Big 12 spouting off at the Pac 10? After Okla. & SC? Your memory is as short as your dick.

Taco Tech vs. Cal... end of story, thanks for playing see you next time you make an ass of yourself ;) :D

Hmmmm,

Cal is the last team to beat the Toejams...

Last year when they lost to $C, they had triple the total offense of $C, had triple the 1st downs, and had triple the time with the ball.

They flat out dominated $C last year... the year $C beat you by 95 points or something...

You need to remember, Cal was booted from BCS by the good ole' boy network in the south...

How motivated would OU be, as the #4 team in the country, and then you have to play in the Holiday Bowl...

I don't think OU would have been to pumped to play that game, if they were screwed.

The only team that can beat $C, is Cal...


m2

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about....AGAIN!

But why let facts get in the way of your weak-ass take?

I don't care if what you are spewing was true, Kal still fucking lost that game. They never even led at any point during the game, asshat.

GreginPG wrote:

m2 wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote: Taco Tech vs. Cal... end of story, thanks for playing see you next time you make an ass of yourself ;) :D

Hmmmm,

Cal is the last team to beat the Toejams...

Last year when they lost to $C, they had triple the total offense of $C, had triple the 1st downs, and had triple the time with the ball.

They flat out dominated $C last year... the year $C beat you by 95 points or something...

You need to remember, Cal was booted from BCS by the good ole' boy network in the south...

How motivated would OU be, as the #4 team in the country, and then you have to play in the Holiday Bowl...

I don't think OU would have been to pumped to play that game, if they were screwed.

The only team that can beat $C, is Cal...


m2

I don't care if what you are spewing was true, Kal still fucking lost that game. They never even led at any point during the game,

Go get the stats from that game, and get back to me...

Your lucky you aren't 0-2 against the "Golden Bears"!!!!

If you have the "balls", you'll bring up the stats from that game..

$C fan doens't have any, so I'm sure you wont come up with the stats from that game..

congrats, on stealing that game, due to Cal mistakes...


the truth

Score by Quarters 1 2 3 4 Score
----------------- -- -- -- -- -----
California............. 0 10 7 0 - 17 Record: (3-1,1-1)
USC Trojans......... 10 6 7 0 - 23 Record: (5-0,2-0)

youre right Cal tripled the Trojans in the most important stats.... (Kal math?)


try getting some players at Cal that can hold on to the ball when they get hit

SoCalTrjn wrote:Score by Quarters 1 2 3 4 Score
----------------- -- -- -- -- -----
California............. 0 10 7 0 - 17 Record: (3-1,1-1)
USC Trojans......... 10 6 7 0 - 23 Record: (5-0,2-0)

youre right Cal tripled the Trojans in the most important stats.... (Kal math?)


try getting some players at Cal that can hold on to the ball when they get hit

of course I'm Right!

the truth...

Get back to me when you have ....

Total yards...

first downs...

and time with the rock...


m2 is the truth

those numbers count more than the score? SC didnt need to make long drives cause those pussies from Kal kept dropping the Rock

m2 wrote:

GreginPG wrote:

m2 wrote: Hmmmm,

Cal is the last team to beat the Toejams...

Last year when they lost to $C, they had triple the total offense of $C, had triple the 1st downs, and had triple the time with the ball.

They flat out dominated $C last year... the year $C beat you by 95 points or something...

You need to remember, Cal was booted from BCS by the good ole' boy network in the south...

How motivated would OU be, as the #4 team in the country, and then you have to play in the Holiday Bowl...

I don't think OU would have been to pumped to play that game, if they were screwed.

The only team that can beat $C, is Cal...


m2

I don't care if what you are spewing was true, Kal still fucking lost that game. They never even led at any point during the game,

Go get the stats from that game, and get back to me...

Your lucky you aren't 0-2 against the "Golden Bears"!!!!

If you have the "balls", you'll bring up the stats from that game..

$C fan doens't have any, so I'm sure you wont come up with the stats from that game..

congrats, on stealing that game, due to Cal mistakes...


the truth

I thought maybe you would have looked at the stats from the game last year before posting your crap. Unlike you, I did.

Just like Kal, just like Aaron Rodgers...you can't finish. I guess I'll have to do it for you.


First downs...28 - 12
Total yards...424 - 205
Possession...37:11 - 22:49

See anything tripled?

There is a reason why they have this thing called a scoreboard. Stats don't mean shit.

Al Gore won the popular vote, what's your fucking point?

Do baseball teams get any runs for the amount of base runners they leave on base? No. Same way football teams don't get points for offensive yardage. Lies, damn lies and statistics. You may have outplayed USC all game, but they crossed the goal line and put the ball through the goal posts more often. They win. Simple concept.

m2 wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:

The Seer wrote:The Big 12 spouting off at the Pac 10? After Okla. & SC? Your memory is as short as your dick.

Taco Tech vs. Cal... end of story, thanks for playing see you next time you make an ass of yourself ;) :D

Hmmmm,

Cal is the last team to beat the Toejams...

Last year when they lost to $C, they had triple the total offense of $C, had triple the 1st downs, and had triple the time with the ball.

They flat out dominated $C last year... the year $C beat you by 95 points or something...

You need to remember, Cal was booted from BCS by the good ole' boy network in the south...

How motivated would OU be, as the #4 team in the country, and then you have to play in the Holiday Bowl...

I don't think OU would have been to pumped to play that game, if they were screwed.

The only team that can beat $C, is Cal...


m2

Ah... the old "we got screwed, so now we don't care, so we got butchered on the field" excuse.

I'm sure the kids were disappointed in not going to a BCS bowl, but they're still competitive athletes looking to play their best. Texas Tech massacred them. Cal was nowhere near as good as you thought they were. End of story.

Team A Score > Team B Score = Victory and it doesn't matter what other stats you want to take into account...

go back to the 2002 tOSU vs Michigan game...Michigan dominated tOSU in every FUCKING Category...time of possession, total yards, 3rd down conversions, the list goes on and on...the only fucking STAT I care about is

14 to 9 tOSU victory...

obviously m2 is a proponent of the moral victory...all those stats against SC didn't help you against the Red Raiders now did they?

so you beat SC wow...don't hurt yourself patting yourself on the back...the year Cal beat SC in triple OT didn't you lose to Utah of the Mountain FUCKING West?

m2 is my lock for board bitch this year.

I dont care about traditional favorites like trix, brad, or babs. I havent seen a poster show this much promise in the preseason in a long time.

Mr T wrote:I havent seen a poster show this much promise in the preseason in a long time.

I agree. Unless Trix officially comes out of the closet and posts a picture of himself vacationing with his manwife in Mykonos, MTard is the clear frontrunner.

Mr T wrote:m2 is my lock for board bitch this year.

I dont care about traditional favorites like trix, brad, or babs. I havent seen a poster show this much promise in the preseason in a long time.

I just checked with the Venetian. They also show m2 as the early favorite for board bitch. Odds posted there are 2-1.

I just checked yesterday's news and it already had m2 as the Board Bitch.

This coyote also smells fresh blood.

Toejams,

Remember this game...










Let me give ya hint...

It's 21-7 Cal in the second quarter, and you have the ball...






m2

^^^ I was there, bitch, where were you??? ^^^







Strong finish, Kal. Way to come through in the klutch.



Bitch.

MTard, where did you go???



[stream]http://members.cox.net/trolling/crickets.wav[/stream]

m2 wrote:Go get the stats from that game, and get back to me... Laughing

Your lucky you aren't 0-2 against the "Golden Bears"!!!! Laughing

If you have the "balls", you'll bring up the stats from that game..

$C fan doens't have any, so I'm sure you wont come up with the stats from that game..

So SC fan calls you on your bullshit facts and posts the stats you mentioned and all we get is...

[stream]http://members.cox.net/trolling/crickets.wav[/stream]??? :roll:

Predictable.

Jimmy Medalions wrote:



^^^ I was there, bitch, where were you??? ^^^

Wrong game Jimmah...

Guess again...

Who won this game and when was it played...










m2

You are approaching Babs's level tardness.

And if you were up 21-7 in the second quarter, does that mean you choked the game away and were lucky to win it in overtime? Sounds like you are the one who is lucky not to be 0-2 the past two years.

m2 wrote:Who won this game and when was it played...

Kal won this game in triple overtime and it was 2003.

Are you going to tell me that the 2004 game never happened?

Since you want to play the history game, check this out

[web]http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/di ... teamid=466[/web]

History sucks much for you, doesn't it? Or do you only care about matters
that transpired during the 2003 season / the time when you, like all Kalfans,
started paying attention to the team again?

Check this out, MTard:

[web]http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/di ... totals.php[/web]

Props, bitch, Kal has a lifetime record that's just barely above .500.

Odds are now at 8-5.

so by m2's logic Cal is better than SC cuz they won in TRIPLE fucking overtime 2 years ago???

time for a board bitch vote:

Babs - MSU rules, until we lose 3 in a row then I can run smack about having the best grass in the country to play on

Trix - everything we did under zook doesn't count...

Jon = Bitch - Iowa, Iowa, Iowa...kickers aren't athletes and well I love looking at my poster of Drew Tate

m2 - Cal owns SC even though SC beat us last year, but we won every stat category so we really won the game even though they are 2 time defending national champions and they have scoreboard on us for beating us in 04

vote for your favorite board bitch...

looks like m2 in a RUNAWAY...



meds - 08 tOSU vs SC in the Coliseum...GIDDY UP BITCH!
meds - 09 SC vs tOSU in the SHOE DOUBLE GIDDY UP BITCH!

buckeye_in_sc wrote:meds - 09 SC vs tOSU in the SHOE DOUBLE GIDDY UP BITCH!

You can count on me traveling to this game.

I have heard of posters going back 5, 10 or 20 years to claim bode but not a specific year over the last 5 years....


Hey Miami 31-21 in 1999, we own y'alls bitch asses....

:roll:

^^^Niiiice.

What up, Toledo? Remember that 49-0 shallacking in '98? Shit.

RACK this thread.