T1B

This is why Alex Smith was the #1 player choosen in the draft...

and some of you tards have him as the worst qb in the league at #32... :roll:


Alex Smith



m2

Good point. #32 might be a bit high considering he might not even be a starting quarterback this season.

Red wrote:Good point. #32 might be a bit high considering he might not even be a starting quarterback this season.

yeah... :roll:

Brilliant response.



m2

m2 wrote:This is why Alex Smith was the #1 player choosen in the draft.

He was the best option for the quarterbackless team that happened to have the #1 pick.

Duh.

hey he cant be worse then dilfer, harrington or boller

Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?

Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?

That's being rather generous.

It's the right call, since he looked like a deer in headlights out there. He just turned 21, and the WCO is the most difficult O to master. Walsh even said he won't run it at Stanford because it takes about 5 years to fully understand all the intricacies of the WCO.

I think by the bye week, he'll be thrown into the fire, be it hell or high water. He needs the reps to get the feel for the WCO. It took Montana 3 years before he was put on the field in the WCO.


m2

m2 wrote:

Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?

That's being rather generous.

It's the right call, since he looked like a deer in headlights out there. He just turned 21, and the WCO is the most difficult O to master. Walsh even said he won't run it at Stanford because it takes about 5 years to fully understand all the intricacies of the WCO.

I think by the bye week, he'll be thrown into the fire, be it hell or high water. He needs the reps to get the feel for the WCO. It took Montana 3 years before he was put on the field in the WCO.


m2

Yeah, but he looked sooooooooooo good on that practice field. Tens of people seemed like they felt the same way.

Do your job m0ds and get a hold of this situation, I'M GETTIN' ANNOYED

m2 wrote:

Red wrote:Good point. #32 might be a bit high considering he might not even be a starting quarterback this season.

yeah... :roll:

Brilliant response.



m2

the TRUTH hurts don't it chime boy? :wink:

Cueball wrote:

m2 wrote:

Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener. I guess Lombardi #6 will have to wait another year, right m2?

That's being rather generous.

It's the right call, since he looked like a deer in headlights out there. He just turned 21, and the WCO is the most difficult O to master. Walsh even said he won't run it at Stanford because it takes about 5 years to fully understand all the intricacies of the WCO.

I think by the bye week, he'll be thrown into the fire, be it hell or high water. He needs the reps to get the feel for the WCO. It took Montana 3 years before he was put on the field in the WCO.


m2

Yeah, but he looked sooooooooooo good on that practice field. Tens of people seemed like they felt the same way.

Do your job m0ds and get a hold of this situation, I'M GETTIN' ANNOYED

So? Take that shit up with your mommy.

Rack #32!



m2

Alex Smith was the #1 pick because the Niners needed a QB , and nobody wanted to trade up to the #1 pick , because there was no 1 player compelling enough to be coveted at #1 by other teams .

If the Niners could have traded down , they would have . They were considering that prior to the draft .

Smith hadn't completed a first down yet .

Besides , you were on the Rodgers bandwagon earlier , right ?

drummer wrote:Alex Smith was the #1 pick because the Niners needed a QB , and nobody wanted to trade up to the #1 pick , because there was no 1 player compelling enough to be coveted at #1 by other teams .

If the Niners could have traded down , they would have . They were considering that prior to the draft .

Smith hadn't completed a first down yet .

Besides , you were on the Rodgers bandwagon earlier , right ?

Yep.

I still think Rodgers will be the better qb, but I hope I'm wrong.


m2

Cueball wrote:

m2 wrote:

Louis Cyphre wrote:Tim Rattay has just been named the starter for the season opener.

Do your job m0ds and get a hold of this situation, I'M GETTIN' ANNOYED

sorry Al...was busy tonight.

m2's last post in this thread is perfect.