Page 1 of 1

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:09 am
by DallasFanatic
Personally I see nothing wrong with this at all. This isn't about money per se, as it is about the chance to play yourself into a money role. Volek has produced when given the shot and deserves to be a starter somewhere. Rosenhaus wouldn't be doing his job if he didn't seek a potential trade to best suit the needs of his client.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:31 am
by DallasFanatic
Well his stock has soared because of that 2004 season, and quite frankly, he should be starting for the Bears this year. However he will get another 10 games this year because McNair will go down again.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:33 am
by orcinus
True, but the market has shifted. Agree with DF here, as Rosenhaus is simply exploring options and seeing if the potential is out there for Volek to improve his position.

In the end, it's up to the player to choose the path and manner with which he deals with such negotiations. Obviously, Volek and Owens are reading from a different handbook here.

But continue to blame Rosenhaus.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:30 am
by DallasFanatic
mvscal wrote:
DallasFanatic wrote:Personally I see nothing wrong with this at all. This isn't about money per se, as it is about the chance to play yourself into a money role. Volek has produced when given the shot and deserves to be a starter somewhere. Rosenhaus wouldn't be doing his job if he didn't seek a potential trade to best suit the needs of his client.
Nonsensical public demands for trades and contract renegotiations do not "best suit the needs of his clients".

It's only a matter of time before Jew Rosendouche is blackballed.
Volek has proven himself capable of starting in the NFL. Rosenhaus just wants to see if a starters position is out there for his client. What part of that is nonsensical? This thread isn't about renegotiating a contract so lets stick to the topic at hand.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:04 am
by DallasFanatic
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Titans head coach Jeff Fisher wrote:"To me, that wouldn't make sense [trading Volek]"
Enough said.
Thats not what your article said:
Titans head coach Jeff Fisher wrote: "To me, that wouldn't make sense [keeping Volek]," Fisher told the paper.
Jus sayin

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:55 pm
by jiminphilly
Anyone read Rosenhaus's book? yeah, me neither.

Anyway, apparently he says in his book that agents should not negotiate contracts etc.. through the media. (I heard this on a sports radio station) I guess he was just being sarcastic in his book? He's done nothing BUT negotiate contracts and roster status through the media.

Mvscal is right, he's digging his own grave.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:43 pm
by UcantTroll#649
mvscal wrote:So who do you think is confused? Fisher or the reporter?
Neither... KC Purse Strings v 0.0 is the obvious answer.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:01 pm
by orcinus
Psst ... Rosenhaus isn't the one throwing temper tantrums and telling coordinators not to speak unless spoken to. Rosenhaus wasn't the one conducting interviews while doing sit-ups in his driveway, and he's definitely not the one that has been alienating his teammates in the media for the entire off-season.

Dude definitely ruffles some feathers, but to say he screwed Owens over is laughable, at best.

Owens doesn't need any help at all in that department.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:35 pm
by Joe in PB
Collin Cowherd on ESPN Radio this morning found the perfect word to describe TO.

Delusional

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:16 pm
by UcantTroll#649
mvscal wrote:A responsible agent would advise Owens to tone his act down.
And you think TO would actually heed such advice? :lol:

Besides trying to explain reality to you, I really can't imagine a bigger waste of time.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:38 pm
by UcantTroll#649
Excellent use of the I know you are... but what am I tactic... Paul.

I'd follow that with some "that ain't smack" smack.

Speaking of
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Hater in da hizzouse....LMAO :lol:
What would you call replying to me when the post was directed at mvscal? Inconsistency much? KYOA much? Much... much?
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:I CAN
Actually... U CANT. Remember that.
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Take a nap.
Wurd. I need a Snooze Button to get through one of your posts.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:44 pm
by rozy
UcantTroll#649 wrote:Snooze Button
:shock:

..almost brings a tear of remembrance to the eye


Amazes me when a guy can be on an agreeable side of an argument by my accounts and STILL make a KC Panocha out of himself...

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:49 am
by RadioFan
rozy wrote:Amazes me when a guy can be on an agreeable side of an argument by my accounts and STILL make a KC Panocha out of himself...
Sigworthy. :D