Mark Brunnell will be our starter by week 5
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:29 pm
Ramsey just isn't getting it done in DC
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:31 pm
You guys are really gonna blow.
Re: Mark Brunnell will be our starter by week 5
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:37 pm
Was there really any doubt?Doug near DC wrote:Ramsey just isn't getting it done in DC
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:38 pm
Actually, Brunnell had a hip injury last year. He has looked much crisper this year in camp.
I think we should just give the ball to Portis every play.
I think we should just give the ball to Portis every play.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:40 pm
Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:42 pm
The Redskins would only promise him a #3 position.
The Giants offered him the backup job behind Manning.
The Giants offered him the backup job behind Manning.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:03 pm
Joe in PB wrote:Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.
He was nothing more then a -
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:14 pm
agreed. i wish the skins would just play whoever actually shows they can play.Joe in PB wrote:Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.
ramsey will drive you nuts- he'll make a good throw and follow it with a bad INT. brunell looks very good, but it is vs second and third stringers. but his arm and legs look light years better than last year.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:38 pm
And his wife was hot. Damn them. :xJoe in PB wrote:Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:39 pm
Two Words: Justin Campbell.
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:37 am
It doesn't suck to be holding the Foreskins #1 pick right about now.
Seriously Foreskin fan , if you are gonna suck why not play Campbell and see what he has got?
Whats the point of going 5-11 with Brunell at QB? You already know he should have hung it up years ago.
At least with the young QB you have potential for improvement and at the very least he gains valuable experience.
Seriously Foreskin fan , if you are gonna suck why not play Campbell and see what he has got?
Whats the point of going 5-11 with Brunell at QB? You already know he should have hung it up years ago.
At least with the young QB you have potential for improvement and at the very least he gains valuable experience.
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 5:09 am
Good lord hell has frozen over, ICSP has an intelligent thought.icantstopfarting wrote:It doesn't suck to be holding the Foreskins #1 pick right about now.
Seriously Foreskin fan , if you are gonna suck why not play Campbell and see what he has got?
Whats the point of going 5-11 with Brunell at QB? You already know he should have hung it up years ago.
At least with the young QB you have potential for improvement and at the very least he gains valuable experience.
The end of the world as we know it can't be far behind.
And by the way hope you enjoy that 1st rounder, the Donks will need it to replace Chump after he gives up 50 TD again this year.
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:00 am
Brunell has looked decent in preseason so far, but we know it won't last.
Ramsey has gotten hit too many times, he just doesn't have the coolness and poise
under pressure essential for success as a NFL quarterback.
I wouldn't be surprised if Campbell is the starter before the end of the season.
Ramsey has gotten hit too many times, he just doesn't have the coolness and poise
under pressure essential for success as a NFL quarterback.
I wouldn't be surprised if Campbell is the starter before the end of the season.