Bonds is a freak
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:01 am
Dude hasn't played ball in 15 months and hasn't seemed to skip a beat. Unbelievable.
Web Page Name
insert here
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:06 am
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:09 am
Because this has nothing to do with baseball or anything, slurper.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:37 am
simply amazed what he can do
doesnt face live pitching for 11 months
NO PROBLEM!
doesnt face live pitching for 11 months
NO PROBLEM!
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:42 pm
Bringing up excellence in sports is the surest way to confuse Mizzou fan.Rack Fu wrote:Because this has nothing to do with baseball or anything, slurper.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:51 pm
Gayhawk fan chirping?Degenerate wrote:Bringing up excellence in sports is the surest way to confuse Mizzou fan.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:24 pm
Oh yeah, he is great....really amazing.
In fact, if we gave 10 other major leaguers steroids for 6 years and about 10 months off to get healthy, I am sure they wouldn't do near as well.
In fact, if we gave 10 other major leaguers steroids for 6 years and about 10 months off to get healthy, I am sure they wouldn't do near as well.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:26 pm
it is possible for a major leaguer to do steroids and still suck.Sky wrote:Oh yeah, he is great....really amazing.
In fact, if we gave 10 other major leaguers steroids for 6 years and about 10 months off to get healthy, I am sure they wouldn't do near as well.
sin
Jermey Giambi
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 7:28 pm
A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:18 pm
He isn't cheatin' now.DrDetroit wrote:A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:26 pm
Once a cheater, always a cheater. I will have no respect for that big headed freak ever againRack Fu wrote:He isn't cheatin' now.DrDetroit wrote:A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 2:30 pm
Cheers to that.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:17 pm
So you're able to guarantee that Bonds doesn't have access to a steroid that cannot be tested for? Perhaps some human growth hormones?Rack Fu wrote:He isn't cheatin' now.DrDetroit wrote:A freak, indeed...a cheater, too.
I'd love to see the proof.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:38 pm
I see.
For people you find distasteful the rule is guilty until proven innocent.
That works.
For people you find distasteful the rule is guilty until proven innocent.
That works.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:15 pm
How about people who have already confessed?Mikey wrote:I see.
For people you find distasteful the rule is guilty until proven innocent.
That works.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:50 pm
"With four more home runs in the past two days, Giambi now has 25 this season after hitting only five in the first three months. Though he started to come around in June, hitting .310 with a .474 on-base average, the left-handed slugger really caught fire in July: 14 homers, 24 RBI, .355 BA, and an eye-popping .524 OBP and .974 SLG. Needless to say, Giambi's turnaround has been critical as the Yankees pursue the Red Sox in another tumultuous season in the Bronx."BSmack wrote:
it is possible for a major leaguer to do steroids and still suck.
sin
Jermey Giambi
The only time he was below average was when MLB started cracking down on roids and he was the poster child.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:58 pm
You might want to eject NOW.Sky wrote:"With four more home runs in the past two days, Giambi now has 25 this season after hitting only five in the first three months. Though he started to come around in June, hitting .310 with a .474 on-base average, the left-handed slugger really caught fire in July: 14 homers, 24 RBI, .355 BA, and an eye-popping .524 OBP and .974 SLG. Needless to say, Giambi's turnaround has been critical as the Yankees pursue the Red Sox in another tumultuous season in the Bronx."BSmack wrote:
it is possible for a major leaguer to do steroids and still suck.
sin
Jermey Giambi
The only time he was below average was when MLB started cracking down on roids and he was the poster child.
sin
Jason Giambi
1st baseman NY Yankees and brother of JEREMY Giambi
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:11 pm
Ahhh, I am an idiot
Good point.
Good point.
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:50 am
Bonds is a machine. His swing is picture perfect w/ no holes.
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:12 pm
So you are saying there isn't a difference between 1990 Barry and 2000 Barry? I understand maturing and growing older but his changes are unreal.
Yes he has a great eye and a great swing but would all of those hits left the park without some help?
Would he even be in the hunt for the all time HR leader?
Would his BA and OBP be so high if some of those fly balls landed in the outfield instead of McCovey Cove?
Yes he has a great eye and a great swing but would all of those hits left the park without some help?
Would he even be in the hunt for the all time HR leader?
Would his BA and OBP be so high if some of those fly balls landed in the outfield instead of McCovey Cove?
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:04 pm
Vote for Pedro
Rack the Padres
Rack the Padres
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:08 pm
Sorry about your pending playoffs dissection.Loganfan wrote:Rack the Padres
Cards are going to take that loser team off some sweet jumps. Cards are basically the only team that has a moustache. They will ruin the PAdres lives and eat all their steak.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:04 pm
ya.....well, since the Padres were 5-2 against them this year, and it's a short series, I'll take my chances.Bizzarofelice wrote:Sorry about your pending playoffs dissection.Loganfan wrote:Rack the Padres
Cards are going to take that loser team off some sweet jumps. Cards are basically the only team that has a moustache. They will ruin the PAdres lives and eat all their steak.
Padres in 4.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:14 pm
When was that series again?Loganfan wrote:ya.....well, since the Padres were 5-2 against them this year, and it's a short series, I'll take my chances.
Padres in 4.
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:15 pm
loganfag
the padres were 4-3 against the cards Short series? YOu mean short bus, no matter how shitty the cardinals are playing, they won;t lose to the Padres.
cardinals have owned the shitstains from San Diego in the playoffs. they swept the cunts to boot.
rack you for smoking so much dope, that your fried your fucking gord.
the padres were 4-3 against the cards Short series? YOu mean short bus, no matter how shitty the cardinals are playing, they won;t lose to the Padres.
cardinals have owned the shitstains from San Diego in the playoffs. they swept the cunts to boot.
rack you for smoking so much dope, that your fried your fucking gord.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:55 am
I laughed. Hard.Loganfan wrote: Padres in 4.
Seriously, there isnt a fucking team from the NL Worst that deserves to be in the playoffs.
Selig should see if there is some loophole in the rulebook so he can just call the series overwith after the Tardres get outscored 29-2 after 2 games. This series wont be fucking close.