Page 1 of 1
More Democrat nonsense re: John Roberts
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:22 pm
by DrDetroit
Appears Feinstein vill vote no to confirm Roberts because Roberts didn't talk enough of being a man, father, and husband...
I thought Bush nominated Roberts for Chief Justice of the United States...
What a bunch of idiots. This is truly a humiliating display for the Democrats.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:53 pm
by Mikey
Leahy sucks for voting for Roberts.
Feinstein sucks for voting against him.
At least you're consistent.
You suck just for sucking.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 2:57 pm
by BSmack
And somewhere Cardinal Richelieu is laughing.
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:10 pm
by DrDetroit
Mikey wrote:Leahy sucks for voting for Roberts.
Feinstein sucks for voting against him.
At least you're consistent.
You suck just for sucking.
I'm not complaining about how they are voting. It's just amazing that a nominee that they felt was a terrible threat to civil rights for minorities and women and privacy is all of sudden qualified despite not having assuaged their fear during the hearings or not qualified because he didn't speak to the Committee as a man, a husband, and a father.
Bwaahahahahaaaa!!! You people are pathetic. You're giving Americans a good laugh this week.
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:38 pm
by See You Next Wednesday
"you people"?
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:35 pm
by Mikey
See You Next Wednesday wrote:"you people"?
He doesn't consider himself a "person".
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:49 am
by Risa
BSmack wrote:And somewhere Cardinal Richelieu is laughing.
uhm, why?