Look out for bot Trolls

[Kierland]

On Sept 23 when this thread was posted 88nazis knew there was a shitstorm coming his way for sucking so much orange cock. He doesn’t want to deal with that, certainly not alone so he opens up the filter and gives pikkkle the heads up knowing that he will have one more psycho for cover. Not actual cover. Not a voice that will debate the topic. Just noise. Something to distract is good enough for him. It’s the HH playbook to a tee. Distract, Spin, Smear Lie, Rinse, Repeat.

[Softball Bat]

We get new user requests quite often. Most are obvious bots. But I have been reminded that a board needs new blood. So i’ve Opened the filter a bit to new users that might or might not be bots.

... and when "Ban Kierfag" came across the desk, it struck the braintrust as one who was here to contribute and raise the bar?

[Dr_Phibes]

That’s just spam. It doesn’t even come close to making what you said any less retarded.

But is it any different than spamming the board with 'fuck fuck shit cunt fuck' at all hours, day or night? No offense, but you just pass over it.

When any thread ends in 'Keirland', it says 'fuck fuck shit cunt fuck'. Not worth bothering.

[Jay in Phoenix]

MS can have no retort to that. Let's hope for once he actually "thinks" before responding.

Doubt that he will though.

[Kierland]

That’s just spam. It doesn’t even come close to making what you said any less retarded.

But is it any different than spamming the board with 'fuck fuck shit cunt fuck' at all hours, day or night? No offense, but you just pass over it.

When any thread ends in 'Keirland', it says 'fuck fuck shit cunt fuck'. Not worth bothering.

I don’t spam I respond. Many times the post I’m responding to is sane so I respond with a sane response like this. Many times it’s not sane so I respond in kind. When was the last time you said anything like that about the people that start the insanity?

[Kierland]

MS can have no retort to that. Let's hope for once he actually "thinks" before responding.

Doubt that he will though.

You heard him I can’t have a retort. Fuckin nazi.
But seriously, idk what you fucking cook up behind the scenes and I really don’t care. I don’t believe a word 88 says and I don’t have access to the logs so not much I can do but put out my theory.
As for the last line I have paid for the server fee before so I guess by his standards I’m not a nazi, so why does he call me one.
As for the mental health angle that is just another tactic used by dickfaces when they want to poison the well. He literally cannot make it thru a post without dropping a fallacy.

[Kierland]

What if it’s one week?

[Jay in Phoenix]

You heard him I can’t have a retort. Fuckin nazi.
But seriously, idk what you fucking cook up behind the scenes and I really don’t care. I don’t believe a word 88 says and I don’t have access to the logs so not much I can do but put out my theory.
As for the last line I have paid for the server fee before so I guess by his standards I’m not a nazi, so why does he call me one.
As for the mental health angle that is just another tactic used by dickfaces when they want to poison the well. He literally cannot make it thru a post without dropping a fallacy.

Sale, what is this current obsession with calling everyone a Nazi? As to the mental health comment, it is a well known fact that you have a very, very angry persona. Maybe it's not true in real life, but it is how you play yourself here. Maybe, just maybe, if you start dropping the insults and actually hold a reasoned discussion instead, then you might find some respect returned in kind.

Yes yes, it's a smack board. We bang on each other. But that is not what I'm talking about. Figure it out dude.

[Kierland]

I do hold reasonable conversations. You ask me to do so (on I think it was flat earth) and I did so. Again I respond to people. You post stupid shit and I call you out with insults. Why are you asking me these questions and not all the right wing people who post stupid shit in the first place? Why just me? Why is everything about me? Except of course to distract because you can’t actually defend their position?
As for as the nazi stuff. People are acting like nazis. They are using the same playbook with the big lies and smearing and the distraction (like talking about me and not the, usually, political topic at hand) I am pointing out how closely in line that is with nazis because what they are doing is dangerous, as were (are) the Nazis.
Now it’s your turn to be reasonable and answer my questions like I did for you.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Excellent. So I shall. For the sake of clarity, let's end the stupidity going on in the other thread and keep it here. Deal?

Okay, so point one. I don't call out the right wing people because for the most part, I agree with them. Not always mind you. However, since the orange tweeter has attained office, the lefties on this board have collectively lost their minds. Well, a couple of them anyway. In all honesty, I can't stand arguing politics. It's like arguing religion. People have their opinions, right or wrong, but that doesn't invalidate them, at least for the most part.

Point two. The reason it feels personal with you, like you're being unfairly called out or insulted, is based on what I mentioned before, your board persona. If you honestly stepped back and were honest about how you react to people posting here, you would see this differently. You start and stir shit way more than anybody else I can remember. You make yourself a punching bag this way.

Point three. You're way off about the Nazi thing. That's a dangerous game you're playing and it can lead to dangerous consequences. Not everyone act that way, just like every cop isn't bad. They do police themselves. Not always, but enough. If we didn't have the police to do the thankless jobs they do, what pray tell, would be the alternative?

Ball to your court.

[Kierland]

So let’s do number three (both parts) first.

3(a)
Nazis- Super dangerous game playing a nazi. Super dangerous to make big lies. To try and disparage the media from inside the gilded gates. To call people savages and worse. The list goes on. My position would be that: First they came for the Muslims but I was not a Musilim.... fill in whatever group the orange menace is attacking today. He is playing a very dangerous game from a position of power. His minions on this board are doing the same. They want to play with fire? I’m game. Why then is it me that gets your brunt? The answer is because you identify with them. As you said above. I get called a nazi but you have never asked them why now have you? Think of me as the messenger. You want to shoot me? Fine. That’s not going to fix the problem. Is Don the Con the actual problem? No he is also a symptom, but let’s deal with the issue you addressed before we go down that particular rabbit hole. So that would be the reasoning why I use that word. Obviously I have not presented any evidence to back it up in this post but I was treating this as more of an opening statement. I would be happy to provide evidence if for some reason you don’t think Donny tinyhands and his minions are playing a very dangerous game.

3(b)
Cops-
On second thought let’s just deal with the nazi issue first and then we can move on.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Okay, I see where you're coming from, to a point. Let's start with this. Don't indict me with any other individual just because I see their point of view. I was a liberal once upon a time. But time and times changes things. I see the left leaning so far in that direction, the prospect of people like Sanders and his Socialistic views really disturbs me, and the extension of that sort of thinking is ultimately Communism. I'm not saying all libs think this way, but the people the Dems are supporting are frighteningly close. Blinders on, rosy sun-glasses polished, way too many people vote and support party in spite of the qualifications, or lack thereof, that these politicians espouse. I hate that. It goes both ways, to be sure. But right now, the leftist manifesto is deeply disturbing.

I've already explained this, but here it is again. I don't go after you because of your politics. I never have. If anything, I'm pretty neutral with politics, kind of like Smackie is. Just don't care to discuss it. I go after you, only when you, in my opinion, go overboard with the repetition, the needless insults, the anger. You become a parody of yourself. Just ease of the gas and make your point.

Now then, the Nazis were and are, a very dangerous group, as you've attested. Trump and company are not Nazis. They may be buffoons, but they are not a group out to cleanse the world of specific races. Most every politician, especially those in the White House are puppets of the elite, the money changers. Those are the ones that need to be watch dogged. But they never will be. Whose to watch them? To check them? To stop them?

As the movie said, who is watching the watchmen?

The Nazi comments need to be sidelined. They are caustic and inflammatory. We all need to drop the name calling and blanket statement insults and actually discuss things. On both sides.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

I was a liberal once upon a time.

Were you "mugged by reality"?

[Jay in Phoenix]

I was a liberal once upon a time.

Were you "mugged by reality"?

Nope. Just raised by liberal parents. They were Kennedy people, through and through.

I just see things differently now.

What about you?

[Softball Bat]

However, since the orange tweeter has attained office, the lefties on this board have collectively lost their minds.

We've never had a president lose his mind like this one has.

Have we?

Anyone remotely close?


The lefties here are mostly just commenting on the obvious.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

Were you "mugged by reality"?

Nope.

I see you're not familiar with the idiotic, conserva-tard, Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro fawning, boomer phrase...

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

Coined by Irving Kristol
‘A neoconservative,’ he famously explained, ‘is a liberal who has been mugged by reality.’

[Mikey]

I was a liberal once upon a time.

Were you "mugged by reality"?

Mescaline overdose

[Dinsdale]

Fiat Sux is a "bottom" troll. Does that make the watch-list?

[Kierland]

As the movie said, who is watching the watchmen?

I will get to the rest when I can but for now I will answer that question because it touches on everything we are discussing.


“For I, for my part, do not believe that a sound body by its excellence makes the soul good, but on the contrary that a good soul by its virtue renders the body the best that is possible. What is your opinion?” “I think so too.” “Then if we should sufficiently train the mind and turn over to it the minutiae of the care of the body, and content ourselves with merely indicating the norms or patterns, not to make a long story of it, we should be acting rightly?” “By all means.” “From intoxication we said that they must abstain. For a guardian is surely the last person in the world to whom it is allowable to get drunk and not know where on earth he is.” “Yes,” he said, “it would be absurd that a guardian should need a guard.”

Sin,
Plato

[Softball Bat]

You are a major 'tard.

[Kierland]

He is not but I am. Gotcha.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Coined by Irving Kristol
‘A neoconservative,’ he famously explained, ‘is a liberal who has been mugged by reality.’

No Marty, I had never heard that expression before. Very interesting link. I don't know if it applies in my case, however some very valid points made.

As to Mikey and his cute little mescaline line...meh. A little bit funny, but you would know far more about that stuff than I would big guy.

[Jay in Phoenix]

However, since the orange tweeter has attained office, the lefties on this board have collectively lost their minds.

We've never had a president lose his mind like this one has.

Have we?

Anyone remotely close?


The lefties here are mostly just commenting on the obvious.

I don't disagree with that. But you're acting as though he has done no good whatsoever, and as much as I dislike the douche, I will give him credit where it's due. Your precious Obama did far more harm than Cheetolini has.

[Kierland]

Whataboutism.

[Softball Bat]

Your precious Obama...

Barry Soetoro was a major fraud and I ripped his ass in here repeatedly.

[Kierland]

Jayne has talking points. It doesn’t matter if they are true or not.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Jayne has talking points. It doesn’t matter if they are true or not.

I thought we were having a civilized discussion here MS. Are we/you devolving back to that childishness.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Your precious Obama...

Barry Soetoro was a major fraud and I ripped his ass in here repeatedly.

Honestly pops, I don't remember seeing you post against him. I will take your word on it. I'm just trying to, as I said to MS, have an actual conversation devoid of insults. 2nd time's the charm.

[Ban Kierfag]

I thought we were having a civilized discussion here MS. Are we/you devolving back to that childishness.

Kierland has FULL BLOWN TDS.....he is beyond hope.

The humane thing to do is an injection to put it out of it's misery.

[Derron]

Jayne has talking points. It doesn’t matter if they are true or not.

I thought we were having a civilized discussion here MS. Are we/you devolving back to that childishness.

Well, he has not dropped his usual and obligatory " You suck orange cock" blast on you. He did get that off against 88 several times as usual, but he must like you better.

[Screw_Michigan]

And I haven't even touched the Russian collusion bullshit he was falsely accused of for years.

Oh really? Do tell. Can't wait to hear this one.

[Kierland]

Jayne has talking points. It doesn’t matter if they are true or not.

I thought we were having a civilized discussion here MS. Are we/you devolving back to that childishness.

My bad, forgot this was the nice thread. I shall rephrase: Jay in Phoenix appears to be just restating talking points he has heard other places because your (poptart’s) post didn’t have anything to do with 44.

[Kierland]

Jayne has talking points. It doesn’t matter if they are true or not.

I thought we were having a civilized discussion here MS. Are we/you devolving back to that childishness.

Well, he has not dropped his usual and obligatory " You suck orange cock" blast on you. He did get that off against 88 several times as usual, but he must like you better.

He asked me to be nice to him and have a normal discussion. I fucked up once cause well T1B but I am back on track. I would extend the same offer to you but I personally don’t think you can do it.

[Jay in Phoenix]

My bad, forgot this was the nice thread. I shall rephrase: Jay in Phoenix appears to be just restating talking points he has heard other places because your (poptart’s) post didn’t have anything to do with 44.

Much appreciated. However, so we can continue or pick up where the discussion was left off, which talking points am I restating?

[Kierland]

Guards guarding guards is more interesting. I quoted Plato (quoting Socrates and Glaucon) to answer your question.

[Kierland]

And I haven't even touched the Russian collusion bullshit he was falsely accused of for years.

Oh really? Do tell. Can't wait to hear this one.

Let's do it the fair way, shall we. He was accused by your people of colluding with Russia. Please go ahead and post any fucking evidence of that that was uncovered in a 2+ year anal probing by Mueller and his merry band of Team D ball washers. Millions of dollars was wasted on that shit. A report was written that said there was absolutely not a fucking thing to report on. Let's see your evidence that he colluded with Russia.

And before Poptard blows a gasket, I'll take anything that you want to mean as collusion. Call it conspiracy, affirmative cooperation, coordination etc. There wasn't jack shit. Now Her on the other hand... At best she was a willing dupe to a Russian disinformation campaign. At worst, she willingly participated in it. And there is evidence of that. Fusion GPS/Christopher Steele ring a bell?

I laid out the violation of 30121 and he gave zero legal analysis so don’t get you hopes up Scewy.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Guards guarding guards is more interesting. I quoted Plato (quoting Socrates and Glaucon) to answer your question.

Apples and oranges, it means the same thing. The quotation is well considered, but it feels incomplete. And it only addresses half of the third point. You have yet to address points 1 and 2 at all.

[Screw_Michigan]

I laid out the violation of 30121 and he gave zero legal analysis so don’t get you hopes up Scewy.

I know. There is no Trump criminal act too low for 88braincells to defend. He is a traitor.

[Screw_Michigan]

Nice try, you two. Legal analysis needs facts and evidence. Lay them out.

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
....If the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal.” Pastor Robert Jeffress,
@FoxNews

TREASON