Impeachment begins

[Jay in Phoenix]

You don’t know anything about nazis, or bullies in general, do you?
You would think they would have taught you such things in lesbian school.

I know you are "trying" to be a bully, but flailing and failing miserably.

I know you are a socialist whack-off who is teetering perilously close to Communism.

I know you're a hypocritical little troll who lies through his rotted teeth for a living.

You would think having that legal sheepskin would have taught you something about the real world.

Guess that's what you get in midget faggot school.

[Kierland]

What do any of those lies have to do with 58USC30121?

[Derron]

You don’t know anything about nazis, or bullies in general, do you?
You would think they would have taught you such things in lesbian school.

I know you are "trying" to be a bully, but flailing and failing miserably.

I know you are a socialist whack-off who is teetering perilously close to Communism.

I know you're a hypocritical little troll who lies through his rotted teeth for a living.

You would think having that legal sheepskin would have taught you something about the real world.

Guess that's what you get in midget faggot school.

I don't read the midgets posts anymore, but Jay is going yard on him pretty much every post. Good to see.

[Kierland]

You really are a stupid tiny Tweaker.

[EAP]

So he violated the statute or not?
Your answer wasn’t clear.

No.
The statute was not violated.
Is that clear?

[Slap]

faggot school.

He learned how to suck dick and even a hairy asshole sometimes.

[Kierland]

Eat A Penis,
Well I provided the law and the facts and legal analysis (in this very thread) and you provided zero.

All part of the process...

[EAP]

Eat A Penis,
Well I provided the law and the facts and legal analysis (in this very thread) and you provided zero.

All part of the process...

What you call facts, the rest of civilization calls bullshit.
Which begs the question,
How do you function on a daily basis?
In the short time I've been here,
You've come across as a delusional unhinged leftist.

[Kierland]

So you got nothing.
That is called a white flag.
Nice white flag.

[Kierland]

What you call facts...

Those fact were provided by your orange leader you spastic tard.
See this is why it’s just easier to type:

Trust the process.

[EAP]

What you call facts...

Those fact were provided by your orange leader you spastic tard.
See this is why it’s just easier to type:

Trust the process.

No.
Again.
What you pass as fact, is not fact.

[Kierland]

Trust the process.
When presented with the evidence just say it doesn’t exist even though your orange tard provided it.

Sin,
88assholespammers

[EAP]

Trust the process.
When presented with the evidence just say it doesn’t exist even though your orange tard provided it.

Sin,
88assholespammers

Really?
Evidence?
Night after night your fellow leftists presented evidence that Mitt Romney was a criminal tax evader who illegally hid his money overseas.

What you call evidence, is not evidence.

We've seen your bullshit before.
That's what you don't seem to understand.

But keep fighting.

[Kierland]

Again,
Your orange menace released the evidence himself.

——-
Noise more noise.
Triple down.
It was a perfect call.
Perfect.
Bring up Mitt the Shitt if you have to.
“Flood the zone”

Sin,
88ovens

[EAP]

Again,
Your orange menace released the evidence himself.

——-
Noise more noise.
Triple down.
It was a perfect call.
Perfect.
Bring up Mitt the Shitt if you have to.
“Flood the zone”

Sin,
88ovens

No.
We bring up your so called evidence and facts.
Then show you how they've been debunked.

Case in point, Mitt Romney being a criminal tax evader who illegally hid his money overseas.
At the time, your left wing socialist party was pimping that as facts.
Today we know that your facts were utter bullshit.

Fast forward to today.
Your facts are still bullshit.
Your so called evidence is still bullshit.

Again.
How do you function on a daily basis?

[Kierland]

Again,
Your orange menace released the evidence himself.

——-
Noise more noise.
Triple down.
It was a perfect call.
Perfect.
Bring up Mitt the Shitt if you have to.
“Flood the zone”

Sin,
88ovens

[EAP]

Again,
Your orange menace released the evidence himself.

——-
Noise more noise.
Triple down.
It was a perfect call.
Perfect.
Bring up Mitt the Shitt if you have to.
“Flood the zone”

Sin,
88ovens

Again.
88 owns your worthless left wing
Socialist ass.
Your takes are laughably uneducated and moronic.
And from the looks of things?
Trump will be re-elected in a landslide!!!
Leaving you in a world of shit.

[Kierland]

Again,
Your orange menace released the evidence himself.

——-
Noise more noise.
Triple down.
It was a perfect call.
Perfect.
Bring up Mitt the Shitt if you have to.
“Flood the zone”

Sin,
88ovens

[EAP]

Again,
Your orange menace released the evidence himself.

——-
Noise more noise.
Triple down.
It was a perfect call.
Perfect.
Bring up Mitt the Shitt if you have to.
“Flood the zone”

Sin,
88ovens

You are in a circular circle jerk.

[Kierland]

Nice white flag.

[EAP]

Nice white flag.

88 made a complete and utter fool out of you, and instead of being humble, you choose to stick around after hours and take out your frustrations on me.
What's that say about you?

[Kierland]

Nice white flag.

[Softball Bat]

88 made a complete and utter fool out of you

No
88 nazis never gave his take on what was posted on page 7 (and then similarly on page 8 ) of this thread.
And he, being a lawyer, was asked by Jsc to weigh in.

Of course I DO notice little things like him not answering a simple question.
lol

JUDGE CHIN: What's your view on the [shooting someone on] Fifth Avenue example? Local authorities couldn’t investigate? They couldn’t do anything about it?
WILLIAM CONSOVOY (Trump Counsel): That is correct. That is correct.



Judge Jackson asked the WH counsel,“So what does checks and balances mean?”

James Burnham, arguing for the Justice Department, replied that the dispute between the House Judiciary
Committee and McGahn should not be resolved through litigation. He argued that the Constitution and more
than two centuries of interactions between the White House and Congress hadn’t required courts to weigh
in. And Jackson shouldn’t now, he said.

“So the House can never go to court?” Jackson asked.

“As a general proposition, that’s correct,” replied Burnham, a former White House aide under McGahn who
is now serving in a senior position in the Justice Department’s civil division...

#nazi

[EAP]

88 made a complete and utter fool out of you

No
88 nazis never gave his take on what was posted on page 7 (and then similarly on page 8 ) of this thread.
And he, being a lawyer, was asked by Jsc to weigh in.

Of course I DO notice little things like him not answering a simple question.
lol

JUDGE CHIN: What's your view on the [shooting someone on] Fifth Avenue example? Local authorities couldn’t investigate? They couldn’t do anything about it?
WILLIAM CONSOVOY (Trump Counsel): That is correct. That is correct.



Judge Jackson asked the WH counsel,“So what does checks and balances mean?”

James Burnham, arguing for the Justice Department, replied that the dispute between the House Judiciary
Committee and McGahn should not be resolved through litigation. He argued that the Constitution and more
than two centuries of interactions between the White House and Congress hadn’t required courts to weigh
in. And Jackson shouldn’t now, he said.

“So the House can never go to court?” Jackson asked.

“As a general proposition, that’s correct,” replied Burnham, a former White House aide under McGahn who
is now serving in a senior position in the Justice Department’s civil division...

#nazi

Why post pics of the nazi socialists?
Makes you left wing government control socialists look real bad.

88 has been 100% correct during this presidency.
And as the criminal investigation continues into the previous administration, 88 continues his dominance over you left wing socialist trolls.

Either you trolls are ignorant or really detached from reality.

Either way, you end up losing.

[Softball Bat]

Feel free to comment on the answers given by Donald's counsel in court.

That would interest me.


Your babble means nothing.

[Softball Bat]

To my knowledge there is no office in America that is so lofty that the person holding it cannot be investigated for the crime of murder.
Do you know of any?


The president is not a king.

He is an office holder.

It is a no-brainer that it should be possible for him/her to be investigated for the crime of murder.


You sick nazi freak.

[Ban Kierfag]

88 just
KICKED YOUR ARSE!


88 =

[Softball Bat]

The issue of executive privilege took front stage when President William Jefferson Clinton was sued for actions alleged to have occurred before he was president. Paula Jones filed a civil suit in 1994, alleging that President Clinton propositioned her in a Little Rock hotel room three years earlier, when he was governor of Arkansas and she was a low-level state employee. She sought damages for "willful, outrageous, and malicious conduct" arising from the allegations of sexual harassment and sexual assault.

Clinton's attorneys argued that the trial should be postponed while Clinton was in office because the litigation would distract him from his presidential duties. In December 1994, a federal district court judge ruled that a trial could not take place while Clinton was in office because of the potential interference with official duties. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the lower court decision.

Clinton appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The Court agreed to hear the case to decide whether civil litigation against an incumbent president must in all but exceptional cases be delayed until after he leaves office. Clinton's legal team raised two main arguments in support of its position that the case should be postponed. First, they argued that constitutional immunity for a president's official actions extends to his unofficial conduct. Second, they argued that the separation of powers doctrine, which ensures that none of the three branches of government infringes on another, forbids a trial judge to force a sitting president to defend himself in a lawsuit.

The Court rejected both of Clinton's arguments. In a 9 to 0 decision in May 1997, the Court ruled that Jones could move forward with her sexual harassment lawsuit because nothing in the Constitution allows a sitting president to postpone a private civil damages lawsuit while he is in office. The Court thought it was unlikely the case would burden Clinton's time. Without commenting on the merits of Jones case, the Court said Jones is entitled to her day in court.

A majority of the Court was un-persuaded by the concern that a failure to postpone private litigation would be an invitation to excessive litigation. They rejected the notion that "our decision will generate a large volume of politically motivated harassing and frivolous litigation." Writing for the Court, Justice Stevens said: "If the past is any indicator, it seems unlikely that a deluge of ... litigation will ever engulf the Presidency." The opinion noted that only three sitting presidents—Theodore Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and John F. Kennedy—had been defendants in civil litigation involving their actions prior to taking office and those cases were all either quickly dismissed or settled.

Only Justice Breyer wrote a separate concurring opinion to express his concerns about a president being subjected to harassing litigation. "Predicting the future is difficult, and I am skeptical," he said.

[Ban Kierfag]

88 just
KICKED YOUR ARSE!


88 =

[Kierland]

If Cheetolini has done nothing wrong he has noting to worry about. That memo is just more authoritarian BS that 88nazis loves so much. Funny how no POTUS was ever charged by any prosecutor for anything in the 200+ years before the memo. You know, back before the authoritarian kelpos like 88nazis we’re running the show.

You are a hack and a true piece of baboon shit.

[Screw_Michigan]

Thank you 88braincells for proving that we'll need to have a Trump Administration Truth and Reconciliation commission when Trump is impeached and removed from office because his GOPtard enablers are the REAL threats to the US and its democratic republic.

[Kierland]

The President, which is the Executive Branch of our three co-equal branches of government, should not be subject to criminal prosecution, which is a function of a different branch of government, namely the Judicial branch, while the present is in office.

ENGLISH MUTHERFUCKER! DO YOU SPEAK IT?!?

You really are a POS.

[EAP]

To my knowledge there is no office in America that is so lofty that the person holding it cannot be investigated for the crime of murder.
Do you know of any?


The president is not a king.

He is an office holder.

It is a no-brainer that it should be possible for him/her to be investigated for the crime of murder.


You sick nazi freak.

You missed 88's point.
He correctly pointed out that the constitution made sense because the opposition party would go after a sitting president starting at the local level.
There would be no end to the attacks.
So this doesn't make the president a king as you so incorrectly pointed out, BUT it protects a sitting president from thousands of attacks at the local party level by an unhinged radical opposition.

[Kierland]

Can you fucking read? Nobody went after a POTUS for 200+ years. That right there shows the memo, 88nazis and you are all full of shit, but trust the process right? No post is too stupid or outlandish for the orange kneepaders.

[EAP]

If Cheetolini has done nothing wrong he has noting to worry about. That memo is just more authoritarian BS that 88nazis loves so much. Funny how no POTUS was ever charged by any prosecutor for anything in the 200+ years before the memo. You know, back before the authoritarian kelpos like 88nazis we’re running the show.

You are a hack and a true piece of baboon shit.

88 correctly pointed out the genius of the constitution.
The president is not a king.
But the founders knew that at the local party level, the president would be attacked by extremists like you.
All over the country you'd have extreme left wing socialist psychopaths like you going after a sitting president.
The founders were brilliant.
88 is a Brilliant legal scholar.
Kierland is getting owned.

[EAP]

Can you fucking read? Nobody went after a POTUS for 200+ years. That right there shows the memo, 88nazis and you are all full of shit, but trust the process right? No post is too stupid or outlandish for the orange kneepaders.

Nobody?
Then the founders were indeed brilliant.

[L45B]

Nice white flag.

How many more lies are you gonna post here before the clock strikes 2 twice, you lying yellow dumb pussified nazi yellow greaser racist fascist yellow liar fuck

[Kierland]

Post one lie I made.

I won’t hold my breath.

[Softball Bat]

Can you fucking read? Nobody went after a POTUS for 200+ years. That right there shows the memo, 88nazis and you are all full of shit, but trust the process right?

These people are mentally ill.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

Can you fucking read? Nobody went after a POTUS for 200+ years. That right there shows the memo, 88nazis and you are all full of shit, but trust the process right?

These people are mentally ill.

I think Dr Detroit 25 really has it in for you. Did you cross him somehow during a previous message board interaction? (SCIII, Hostboard...)