Sounds more like something a judge would say to you. :doh:
Chauvin verdict
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Chauvin verdict
IKYABWAI
Are you sure you moved to SC and not KC.
Crawl back under your rock.
Are you sure you moved to SC and not KC.
Crawl back under your rock.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Chauvin verdict
[The judge] wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive(s) with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
Vyskocil's ruling last week, dismissing a slander lawsuit filed against Carlson, was a win for Fox, First Amendment principles and the media more generally, as Fox News itself maintains. As a legal matter, the judge ruled that Karen McDougal, the woman suing Carlson, failed to surmount the challenge.
He literally can’t slander you because he lies so much.
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
Vyskocil's ruling last week, dismissing a slander lawsuit filed against Carlson, was a win for Fox, First Amendment principles and the media more generally, as Fox News itself maintains. As a legal matter, the judge ruled that Karen McDougal, the woman suing Carlson, failed to surmount the challenge.
He literally can’t slander you because he lies so much.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Chauvin verdict
Yep.Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:12 pm [The judge] wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive(s) with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
Vyskocil's ruling last week, dismissing a slander lawsuit filed against Carlson, was a win for Fox, First Amendment principles and the media more generally, as Fox News itself maintains. As a legal matter, the judge ruled that Karen McDougal, the woman suing Carlson, failed to surmount the challenge.
He literally can’t slander you because he lies so much.
His is just a cartoon show.
Only there to be laffed at.
And yet the pitiful low IQ crowd actually thinks the little twat is presenting them with news.
rotf...
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Chauvin verdict
Pretty much, yes.shutyomouth wrote:Floyd was a fucked up idiot. Cop is a fucked up idiot.
That said, fucked up idiots are not in charge of snuffing out other fucked up idiots.
We definitely don't want that kind of a world.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7308
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Chauvin verdict
Very true. Alex Moffat (who is about the WORST stand-up comic I've ever seen, and I've seen many) does a good job on SNL of lampooning him...Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:27 pmHis is just a cartoon show.
Only there to be laffed at.
And yet the pitiful low IQ crowd actually thinks the little twat is presenting them with news.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
Re: Chauvin verdict
A cop who isn't willing to have his actions scrutinized shouldn't be a cop. It's all part of the job. We are all scrutinized for our job performance. Just because you carry a badge and a gun, it doesn't let you off the hook. Cops who "look the other way" ought to be fired. I don't believe that holding cops to a high job performance standard is going to create a shortage of them. The more a community appreciates and respects its police force, the more attractive the job will be to applicants.smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:46 am The biggest victim has been the people who live in the hood who are dependent on cops doing the hard but necessary job of aggressive policing in places that badly need it. Murder rates have skyrocketed because the cops have decided to look the other way. And who can blame them? If I was a cop 2 years from retirement, I would do the same.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9606
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: Chauvin verdict
Pelosi isn't part of calling out the NG. The chief of Capitol police is. What time did that request from the chief go out, and when did the NG actually arrive?smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:49 amNo, it wasn't a big nothing. But, had the Capitol cops had the backup they requested, maybe it could have been.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:33 pmYeah, the whole thing was pretty much a big nothing.smackaholic wrote:That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
But Pelosi and company wanted a big something, so they denied help.
And note what time the VPOTUS (president of the Senate) put out a request for the NG. But yeah, it's all Pelosi's fault.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Chauvin verdict
Roach wrote:rotfc . . . crying sad and mad at the apparent large number of LoIQ reptile brains out there. Jesus, who other than that would buy into his antics? Not the judge hahaha.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Chauvin verdict
Sadly, this is pretty close to reality.Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:22 pmVery true. Alex Moffat (who is about the WORST stand-up comic I've ever seen, and I've seen many) does a good job on SNL of lampooning him...Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:27 pmHis is just a cartoon show.
Only there to be laffed at.
And yet the pitiful low IQ crowd actually thinks the little twat is presenting them with news.
:)
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Chauvin verdict
Tucker's college yearbook photo.
Proud member of the Dan White Society.
And who is Dan White?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_White
Dan White = a violent, deranged killer.
Geez!
Proud member of the Dan White Society.
And who is Dan White?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_White
Dan White = a violent, deranged killer.
Geez!
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Chauvin verdict
No, cops who look the other way should be jailed. Why are you so soft on pigs?ML@Coyote wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 5:37 pmA cop who isn't willing to have his actions scrutinized shouldn't be a cop. It's all part of the job. We are all scrutinized for our job performance. Just because you carry a badge and a gun, it doesn't let you off the hook. Cops who "look the other way" ought to be fired. I don't believe that holding cops to a high job performance standard is going to create a shortage of them. The more a community appreciates and respects its police force, the more attractive the job will be to applicants.smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:46 am The biggest victim has been the people who live in the hood who are dependent on cops doing the hard but necessary job of aggressive policing in places that badly need it. Murder rates have skyrocketed because the cops have decided to look the other way. And who can blame them? If I was a cop 2 years from retirement, I would do the same.
And I know I give cops a lot of shit but it’s not even really their fault. They are, for the most part, not very smart. I blame the DAs and judges that encourage this behavior because they could stop it and they know better.
Edit to add: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/los-angele ... =116953265
The other officers are like “Naw Naw” I’m not going down with you. Good for them, maybe they saw what happened in Minn. when you stand around and let other cops commit crimes.
Re: Chauvin verdict
What's your solution to the problem you perceive?
Re: Chauvin verdict
I’m not arguing with you over a solution you don’t see as necessary. I will debate whether we need police reform and then if you do decide we need it debate the solution.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Things can always be improved, so yes, I am all for reform. I do not, however, think that calling police officers "pigs" is a good starting point. I also don't agree with you that all cops are bad.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Chauvin verdict
He has no solutions.
He hates authority. He does everything he can to get the scumbags he represents off.
Are the there bad cops?
Sure there are. Chauvin is a good example of one. He never should have lasted on the job as long as he did. But getting rid of a unionized public sector person is nearly impossible.
There does need to be ample training. As for their pay, in my neck of the woods they’re paid pretty damn well.
But cops who have to work in areas where they sometimes have to be assholes to do the job, shouldn’t be second guessed. When a cop shoots a person when that person is moments from killing someone, people, especially overpaid athletes ought to shut the fukk up.
But these cops get absolutely no support from liberal politicians who, for political reasons, support the all cops are racist narrative
The result is these cops say “fukk it, you’re on your own”.
As a direct result, the real balck genocide, young balck males killing other young balck males is through the roof.
But the libs couldn’t possibly give the slightest of fukks, because balck lives matter.....when it’s in their political interest.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He hates authority. He does everything he can to get the scumbags he represents off.
Are the there bad cops?
Sure there are. Chauvin is a good example of one. He never should have lasted on the job as long as he did. But getting rid of a unionized public sector person is nearly impossible.
There does need to be ample training. As for their pay, in my neck of the woods they’re paid pretty damn well.
But cops who have to work in areas where they sometimes have to be assholes to do the job, shouldn’t be second guessed. When a cop shoots a person when that person is moments from killing someone, people, especially overpaid athletes ought to shut the fukk up.
But these cops get absolutely no support from liberal politicians who, for political reasons, support the all cops are racist narrative
The result is these cops say “fukk it, you’re on your own”.
As a direct result, the real balck genocide, young balck males killing other young balck males is through the roof.
But the libs couldn’t possibly give the slightest of fukks, because balck lives matter.....when it’s in their political interest.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Chauvin verdict
I do tend to be a bit of a bombthrower, but nice people get no place. That said, what percentage do you think have lied on the stand or falsified a report at least once?
And I vaguely remember you being a CO or something in a past life.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Your question was how many cops lied at least once. That hardly equates to lying all the time. And I don't know that defense attorneys lie all the time. You might. And maybe you're okay with that.
But we're getting off track. You still haven't presented any viable plan for police reform.
But we're getting off track. You still haven't presented any viable plan for police reform.
Re: Chauvin verdict
I already told you, I’m not wasting my time explaining a solution when you have not admitted there is a problem.
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7308
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Chauvin verdict
To what place are you trying to get?
ETA?
Asking for a friend.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
Re: Chauvin verdict
That guy has swallowed a lot of sperm.
smackaholic wrote:I would touch someone's dick, hell, I'd fukking blow him