![Image](https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/b20feb0/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3000x1947+0+0/resize/1200x779!/quality/80/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F5a%2F21%2F222028994f7a80101b016af25370%2Fobit-dede-roberson-56441.jpg)
https://www.latimes.com/obituaries/stor ... rtson-dead
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
We’ve been getting about an hour or two each day starting at about 2:00 pm. It’s actually starting to come out right now, and it’s not even 1:00. In a couple of months we’ll probably be looking back fondly at this weather.
No that's a real pic. Yours are all stock pr bullshit sugar coated tripe.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
This is a good read. Well worth the time.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Jun 08, 2023 2:53 pm The rotten.com/library had the definitive bio of Pat Robertson
https://web.archive.org/web/20170602195 ... robertson/
Well maybe but you are both anti choice and anti trans and those are two of the things he railed most against.
Males have a tendency to wander a little bit. And what you want to do is make a home so wonderful he doesn’t want to wanderMeat Head wrote: ↑Thu Jun 08, 2023 2:25 pm What a great guy . . .
https://www.cnn.com/2013/07/09/us/pat-r ... index.html
Friend of woman and gay, trans, etc. May he vomit in hell
![]()
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Hitler and I both love(d) dogs, but I’m neither a Nazi nor do I want to dominate the world!
Says the guy who just broke relationships down to two things, yeah you’re a real deep thinker.
That is a horrible analogy because liking dogs is not a political stance. In case you can’t tell my whole point is you are also being an asshole buy vilifying trans people.
Nope.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
When will I become a nazi?Kierland wrote:mr misogynist
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
60% of divorces are initiated by women.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 4:54 am Males have a tendency to wander a little bit. And what you want to do is make a home so wonderful he doesn’t want to wander
- Pat Robertson
That is what I commented on.
What we generally hear when a man is caught cheating is, "Ohh, bad man. How dare he? Poor wife."
The wife is seen as the victim, as your simple mind immediately declared.
The woman is not, imo, immediately the victim.
lol
It is not that simple.
If one is able to look more closely at the husband/wife relationship, they will find that in most cases, imo, when the man cheats, the woman has also gone afoul in some way(s) leading up to the man actually committing adultery.
You might already be one. Did you think, even for a minute, that the person about to cheat owes it to their partner to communicate their displeasure and if no agreement can be reached, leave their partner instead of cheating? You are one fucked up soul.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Jun 09, 2023 5:44 amWhen will I become a nazi?Kierland wrote:mr misogynist
In my first post.poptart wrote:When a man commits adultery, I look at both the husband and the wife, because in most cases, both of them have gone afoul, imo.
The man has gone over the line, yes, and he should not do so.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
If a man commits adultery, it means the relationship is failing.Kierland wrote:Also love how you are trying guilt by association
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
I disagree with Kierland on many issues.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is