Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 5:06 pm
Name the only other presidential candidate to skip the Al Smith Charity Dinner?
Cackles is in rarified air. Mondale won one state.
Just as well she skipped. She's a humorless c-nt.
Speaks volumes about the Al Smith Charity Dinner (that nobody gives a flying fuck about) that they let a dementia riddled pile of human waste like Dump come and spew his greatest hits. Fuck him and fuck you.
kcdave wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 8:36 pm
3 responses in this thread. Every fekken one of them is a ButTrump deflection.
You bring this up in just about every thread. It's not a deflection but a legitimate comparison, but I wouldn't expect you ever to acknowledge that Trump has any faults at all. You seem to constantly operate under a double standard and don't even respond in threads that are critical of your poster boy. Nor do you ever bother to respond to posts calling out your ignorance and blatant dumbfuckery.
Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 5:06 pm
Name the only other presidential candidate to skip the Al Smith Charity Dinner?
Cackles is in rarified air. Mondale won one state.
Just as well she skipped. She's a humorless c-nt.
Speaks volumes about the Al Smith Charity Dinner (that nobody gives a flying fuck about) that they let a dementia riddled pile of human waste like Dump come and spew his greatest hits. Fuck him and fuck you.
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 8:36 pm
3 responses in this thread. Every fekken one of them is a ButTrump deflection.
You bring this up in just about every thread. It's not a deflection but a legitimate comparison, but I wouldn't expect you ever to acknowledge that Trump has any faults at all. You seem to constantly operate under a double standard.
No one has ever said Trump has no faults.
But he has demonstrated his ability to lead successfully.
You consistently have no argument for why Harris should be our POTUS. It nothing but “but Trump” from your side.
But he has demonstrated his ability to lead successfully.
You consistently have no argument for why Harris should be our POTUS. It nothing but “but Trump” from your side.
Her positive qualities are obvious to anyone who actually bothers to listen or read anything but Republican disinformation. But the biggest issue in this election is Trump's dishonesty, criminality and the fact that he is absolutely unqualified to hold any public office.
But he has demonstrated his ability to lead successfully.
You consistently have no argument for why Harris should be our POTUS. It nothing but “but Trump” from your side.
Her positive qualities are obvious to anyone who actually bothers to listen or read anything but Republican disinformation. But the biggest issue in this election is Trump's dishonesty, criminality and the fact that he is absolutely unqualified to hold any public office.
What positive qualities? Joy and vibes ain’t gonna cut it.
Mikey wrote:But the biggest issue in this election is Trump's dishonesty, criminality and the fact that he is absolutely unqualified to hold any public office.
For reasonably well off (at least) liberal voters, yes, this will be the biggest issue.
But for the overall electorate, the biggest issue in this election will be the economy.
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 9:40 pm
But for the overall electorate, the biggest issue in this election will be the economy.
His monumentally stupid economic proposals are part of what makes him unqualified to hold public office. Is that too complicated for you to get? Do you think his 20% tariffs will reduce inflation, or create more jobs?
That and his other policies would increase the national debt by another $7 trillion on top of the $7 trillion he added to it during his first term.
You would prefer Trump over Harris based on the economy? Wow. Just wow. You’ve really been hoodwinked by the prevaricator in chief.
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:06 pm
What are Kamala's qualifications to lead the world's biggest economy?
Well... she isn't Donald Trump.
Rinse, repeat, repeat, repeat.
Why don’t you tell me how she is not qualified?
Asking someone to prove a negative is a forensic trap and you know it. You think I just fell out of a coconut tree or something?
You're making the argument, you prove the argument. Why is she qualified? So far you've offered two reasons:
1. Not Donald Trump
2. Her qualifications are obvious
Think maybe you could flesh out the argument a little further, pumpkin?
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:06 pm
What are Kamala's qualifications to lead the world's biggest economy?
Well... she isn't Donald Trump.
Rinse, repeat, repeat, repeat.
Why don’t you tell me how she is not qualified?
Asking someone to prove a negative is a forensic trap and you know it. You think I just fell out of a coconut tree or something?
You must have, because I already showed you how Trump is NOT qualified. Or did you forget how to read?
Now, why don't you go through the Harris economic agenda that I already posted and tell me what you disagree with. Then you can tell me what makes Trump more qualified. And don't tell me that it's because he's such a successful businessman.
Or, as usual, you can run and hide yelling "rinse repeat rinse repeat" as you back away with your tail between your legs.
popart wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 9:40 pm
But for the overall electorate, the biggest issue in this election will be the economy.
His monumentally stupid economic proposals are part of what makes him unqualified to hold public office. Is that too complicated for you to get? Do you think his 20% tariffs will reduce inflation, or create more jobs?
That and his other policies would increase the national debt by another $7 trillion on top of the $7 trillion he added to it during his first term.
You would prefer Trump over Harris based on the economy? Wow. Just wow. You’ve really been hoodwinked by the prevaricator in chief.
I'm not talking about what I want or think, Mikey.
I'm talking about what the overall electorate is thinking.
They are thinking the economy is in the tank. They are hurting.
Harris is linked to this current economy.
Is she a compelling, energetic figure who is articulating a clear plan for how she is going to turn it around?
I think Harris is amazing. Her accomplishments and stuff. Her mom was middle class. She only blew Willie Brown because she loved his old married ass. She is the only lawyer on the ballot. She prosecuted drug people, including dudes who smoked the same weed she did (ha, ha). She almost won a delegate in the 2020 D primary. Almost. She cast a gazillion votes to break ties in the Senate to pass Joe’s stuff she cannot remember anything about except she wouldn’t change a thing but isn’t responsible for. She proposed a bunch of shit in 2019 when she was running for exactly the same office she is running for now, but will no longer support the positions she staked out then “because she follows the law.” I don’t think the law changed. So she either proposed illegal shit in 2019 or decided that the non-illegal shit she proposed then has somehow become illegal. But shut the fuck up you racist and all. Her economic plans, which she cannot articulate but are on a website somewhere are awesome. Friends of the dudes that said Hunter’s laptop was fake said do. So there. People like her. Well not really. But her vitals are stronger than Joe’s and that is everything. Seriously. She likes war and is supported by (fill in the blank, Boeing, Raytheon, etc.). The border is secure (asylum seekers form a convoy to Red States, please). Democracy will be protected provided we do not allow people to speak their mind or vote for the wrong candidate. Mail in your ballots as often as you can.
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 8:36 pm
3 responses in this thread. Every fekken one of them is a ButTrump deflection.
You bring this up in just about every thread. It's not a deflection but a legitimate comparison, but I wouldn't expect you ever to acknowledge that Trump has any faults at all. You seem to constantly operate under a double standard and don't even respond in threads that are critical of your poster boy. Nor do you ever bother to respond to posts calling out your ignorance and blatant dumbfuckery.
Try making a case for Whoreiss, dumbfuck.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
She’s the prime example of why DEI has got to go. No qualifications other than, as Biden himself made clear,
“Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender”
And the only way to eliminate this horrible, crippling policy is to defeat Harris.
The Democrats want mediocrity and that is already bringing the US to its knees. We can’t maintain competitiveness with China if we continue employing DEI.
A candidate who wants to impose 20% across the board tariff (and you’re worried about inflation? ). Who has threatened to arrest his political opponents and journalists who he doesn’t like. Who stated today that he would not accept the results of the election if he doesn’t win. etc., etc., etc.
And what, exactly has he “delivered?” Besides a horrible pandemic, of course. And 34 felony convictions.
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2024 10:16 pm
A candidate who wants to impose 20% across the board tariff (and you’re worried about inflation? ). Who has threatened to arrest his political opponents and journalists who he doesn’t like. Who stated today that he would not accept the results of the election if he doesn’t win. etc., etc., etc.
And what, exactly has he “delivered?” Besides a horrible pandemic, of course. And 34 felony convictions.
Wow. Why do you hate America?
For someone who despises the idea of binary genders, you have no issues with imposing a binary view where tariffs are concerned.
Do a bit more research before spouting off about the horrors of tariffs.
When used appropriately, they are actually a positive, and create growth.
Funny how Biden never rescinded any of Trump’s tariffs too.