Mark Brunnell will be our starter by week 5

Doug near DC · Post by **Doug near DC** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:29 pm

Ramsey just isn't getting it done in DC

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:31 pm

You guys are really gonna blow.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:37 pm

Doug near DC wrote:Ramsey just isn't getting it done in DC

Was there really any doubt?

Doug near DC · Post by **Doug near DC** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:38 pm

Actually, Brunnell had a hip injury last year. He has looked much crisper this year in camp.

I think we should just give the ball to Portis every play.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:40 pm

Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.

Doug near DC · Post by **Doug near DC** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:42 pm

The Redskins would only promise him a #3 position.

The Giants offered him the backup job behind Manning.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:03 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.

He was nothing more then a -

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:14 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.

agreed. i wish the skins would just play whoever actually shows they can play.

ramsey will drive you nuts- he'll make a good throw and follow it with a bad INT. brunell looks very good, but it is vs second and third stringers. but his arm and legs look light years better than last year.

Jeff 2K5 · Post by **Jeff 2K5** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:38 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Why exactly did the Redskins get rid of Tim Hasselbeck? Last season he looked better than Brunell or Ramsey.

And his wife was hot. Damn them. :x

Jeff 2K5 · Post by **Jeff 2K5** » Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:39 pm

Two Words: Justin Campbell.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:37 am

It doesn't suck to be holding the Foreskins #1 pick right about now.

Seriously Foreskin fan , if you are gonna suck why not play Campbell and see what he has got?

Whats the point of going 5-11 with Brunell at QB? You already know he should have hung it up years ago.

At least with the young QB you have potential for improvement and at the very least he gains valuable experience.

Jeff 2K5 · Post by **Jeff 2K5** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 5:09 am

icantstopfarting wrote:It doesn't suck to be holding the Foreskins #1 pick right about now.

Seriously Foreskin fan , if you are gonna suck why not play Campbell and see what he has got?

Whats the point of going 5-11 with Brunell at QB? You already know he should have hung it up years ago.

At least with the young QB you have potential for improvement and at the very least he gains valuable experience.

Good lord hell has frozen over, ICSP has an intelligent thought.

The end of the world as we know it can't be far behind.

And by the way hope you enjoy that 1st rounder, the Donks will need it to replace Chump after he gives up 50 TD again this year.

Funkywhiteboy · Post by **Funkywhiteboy** » Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:00 am

Brunell has looked decent in preseason so far, but we know it won't last.
Ramsey has gotten hit too many times, he just doesn't have the coolness and poise
under pressure essential for success as a NFL quarterback.
I wouldn't be surprised if Campbell is the starter before the end of the season.

T1B

Mark Brunnell will be our starter by week 5

Mark Brunnell will be our starter by week 5

Re: Mark Brunnell will be our starter by week 5