Isn't this OU/texass week?

Waz · Post by **Waz** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 am

:wink:

where is everybody?

harvie, of course a sig bet is on.

Sooners by 10. Mark it down!

Harvdog · Post by **Harvdog** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:48 am

Long time no talk. I am definetly in. I watched you guys play last night and cannot wait til Saturday. Bomar can only throw a slant and we will have 8 in the box for AP if he is healthy. :roll:

Stoop is a good coach but were a way better team than the previous 5 years. I think this is the year we open up a serious can. I can see half a hundred in OU's future and it won't be good. I would play Vince all day and run it up.

Texas by at least 21.

PrimeX · Post by **PrimeX** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:18 am

In.

Can't wait to reverse the sig and avatard bet I've been diseased with the past 4 years by Orc. Things are gonna change this Saturday.

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:54 am

OU's offense should struggle against the Texas D.
without respecting the passing game they'll be able to stack the line against the run and blitz on passing downs.
Bomar is accident prone under pressure and if he gets rattled early he'll hand Texas the ball all day long.
however,the OU D thrives on stopping the run game and Young will have to complete some passes to move the ball with any consistency.
the only way OU stays close is special teams,field position and a zero passing game from UT.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:28 am

Another week of taking candy from a baby.

Oh well, this is life in the Big 12.

I'm in.

Texas 38
blOwU 13

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:57 am

Harvdog wrote: but were a way better team than the previous 5 years.

like that's the only variable to account for the last 5 years. that's pretty weak. kind of like when your girlfriend "settles" an argument by saying: "whatever".

early line: Texas -14.

Harvdog · Post by **Harvdog** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:13 pm

King Crimson wrote:
Harvdog wrote: but were a way better team than the previous 5 years.
like that's the only variable to account for the last 5 years. that's pretty weak. kind of like when your girlfriend "settles" an argument by saying: "whatever".

early line: Texas -14.

Part of the reason we lost the last 5 years was OU was better. We may have had some better talent but OU was a better team. We came close last year but didn't do it.

I really don't think that is a weak argument. The better team won. And this year will be no different

Texas 44
OU 13

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:16 pm

Harvdog wrote:
King Crimson wrote:
Harvdog wrote: but were a way better team than the previous 5 years.
like that's the only variable to account for the last 5 years. that's pretty weak. kind of like when your girlfriend "settles" an argument by saying: "whatever".

early line: Texas -14.
Part of the reason we lost the last 5 years was OU was better. We may have had some better talent but OU was a better team. We came close last year but didn't do it.

I really don't think that is a weak argument. The better team won. And this year will be no different

Texas 44
OU 13

i misread your post then. i thought were was a typo for we're.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:15 pm

OU wins.

Our strengths play to Texas' weaknesses (weak offense vs. weak defense) and Texas' weaknesses play to our strengths. (strong running offense vs. strong run defense) In games like that it usually comes down to coaching and intangibles. Which gives Texas a bwahahahahahaha...

OU wins.

the_ouskull

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 5:51 pm

For once I am rooting for OU. I would love for them to take out UT so FSU can jump to #3. In rivaly games you can throw out all the records and stats b/c both teams will be amped.

Praying for......

OU 20
UT 17

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:00 pm

Please, Crown. Don't root for OU. We need your support like we need an asshole on our elbow.

Right here. An asshole.

the_ouskull

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:27 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Fuck it.

OU will win. In convincing fashion. There will be at least one "What the FUCK?" coaching decision from Brown during the game that will turn the tide.

OU always saves something for the Texas game. There's always a play that the coaches work on for weeks before the game that end up working to perfection. Something that takes advantage of Texas' defensive tendencies that the Longhorns just aren't able to stop.

This year, I say it's throwing the ball to the wideouts.

Texas will never expect it.

21-7. Sooners.

That was a convincing little rant :roll:

I would hope that stoopie is smart enough to not hold anything back against UCLA or TCU, or Tulsa for that matter. If stoops was holding back his good stuff for Texas then it is likely not going to make a difference anyway.

BTW I don't care what he has up his sleve, Mack is still going to insert his foot in Bobs ass on Saturday.

Bob has lost control of his team. How many players have walked off, how the hell does someone lose an entire recruiting class.

I love how Bomar refers to all the team goals as I and all the team problems as they. Real winner you got there.

I especially love how the joklehoma offensive strength is running the ball when you have averaged just 142 yards against a stellar defenses like Tulsa TCU and KSU. Sorry if I'm not impressed.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:10 am

i guess they don't have sarcasm where you live.

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:34 am

Vito Corleone wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote:Fuck it.

OU will win. In convincing fashion. There will be at least one "What the FUCK?" coaching decision from Brown during the game that will turn the tide.

OU always saves something for the Texas game. There's always a play that the coaches work on for weeks before the game that end up working to perfection. Something that takes advantage of Texas' defensive tendencies that the Longhorns just aren't able to stop.

This year, I say it's throwing the ball to the wideouts.

Texas will never expect it.

21-7. Sooners.
That was a convincing little rant :roll:

I would hope that stoopie is smart enough to not hold anything back against UCLA or TCU, or Tulsa for that matter. If stoops was holding back his good stuff for Texas then it is likely not going to make a difference anyway.

BTW I don't care what he has up his sleve, Mack is still going to insert his foot in Bobs ass on Saturday.

Bob has lost control of his team. How many players have walked off, how the hell does someone lose an entire recruiting class.

I love how Bomar refers to all the team goals as I and all the team problems as they. Real winner you got there.

I especially love how the joklehoma offensive strength is running the ball when you have averaged just 142 yards against a stellar defenses like Tulsa TCU and KSU. Sorry if I'm not impressed.

considering that UT has been outscored 189-54 in the last five games with OU, I wonder if Mack remembers what it's like to insert his foot in Bob's ass?

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:24 am

Don't try and deny you believe the stuff you wrote.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:22 pm

Vito Corleone wrote:Don't try and deny you believe the stuff you wrote.

vito, i got question fer ya: i need a horn opinon.

help me settle a difference on another board: don't you think it's sort of dumb when aggy calls UT......tu?

that whole goofy stuff with making goofy names like "radio" is pretty aggy or at best 7th grade stuff iddn't it?

edit: i didn't need to reply with quote--it's got nothing to do with that part of the thread.

Harvdog · Post by **Harvdog** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 3:53 pm

King Crimson wrote:
Vito Corleone wrote:Don't try and deny you believe the stuff you wrote.
vito, i got question fer ya: i need a horn opinon.

help me settle a difference on another board: don't you think it's sort of dumb when aggy calls UT......tu?

that whole goofy stuff with making goofy names like "radio" is pretty aggy or at best 7th grade stuff iddn't it?

I can answer that for you. I think it is totally retarded. A&M has the biggest case of penis envy of all schools. It is hammered into their heads at fish camp. The whole Radio thing is stupid also. I also love how Reggie is so much better than Vince yet they could barley squeak by BAYLOR in aggyville. When they say TU it sounds stupid. I alsways say A&M not m&a. That is not funny. It is kida like the texass or whorn thing OU fan does. Granted, Texas fans call OU blOwU so I guess it evens out. But, aggy fan goes a little further than most.

I said A&M would be lucky to go 7-4. I think they lose to OU, Texas and Tech. Hell, they may even lose to CU too. Fran is a fraud. A few more years of this and Frisco will be begging for RC back.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:01 pm

i think CU will beat aTm.

i think the Aggies are more talented--but i think CU wins.

they are pretty tough in Boulder. i'd have really liked to go to that one....but there's other things one has to attend to.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:21 pm

Baylor blew a lot of opportunities at ATM, I wouldn't count on CU doing the same in their own crib. I like the Buff chances to actually represent for the north.

OU did look pretty good against KSU and seems to have turned a corner. In a few weeks I'd really like their chances but I don't think they are there yet, especially with Adrian banged-up. Stoops may outcoach Brown but they are now equal in terms of assistants and IMO Texas should be too physical in the end.

Texas 24
OU 20

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:32 pm

the_ouskull wrote:We need your support like we need an asshole on our elbow. Right here. An asshole.

Yeah, what would be the point? It's like asking questions in a letter.

Skull,
I always appreciate the ROA resets.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:23 pm

Great fuckin' movie. Makes me sad though... I pretty much Bateman'ed my way through college the first time around, minus the Rupert, plus a fraternity.

...not that that's an entirely bad thing, I'm just saying.

the_ouskull

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:07 pm

the_ouskull wrote:Please, Crown. Don't root for OU. We need your support like we need an asshole on our elbow.

Right here. An asshole.

the_ouskull

Dont worry. Its actually a win-win situation. Either OU gets their ass handed to them or UT loses and FSU moves up. Either way, there will be a smile on my face this Saturday.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:13 pm

Cicero wrote:
Dont worry. Its actually a win-win situation. Either OU gets their ass handed to them or UT loses and FSU moves up. Either way, there will be a smile on my face this Saturday.

spoken like a real college football fan who loves the competition and sport on the field. and not a brainless homer, at all.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:50 pm

Why, cause I want my team to move up or that I would love to see OU get their ass kicked for a change?