Raiders vs. Chargers

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Tue Oct 11, 2005 7:53 pm

Chargers on a short week will be out of gas and ripe for an assbeating. Raiders are rested and now clicking fairly well.

The offense finds its stride facing the shit DB's that the Chargettes try to pass off as real players.....

Raiders-34

Blots-21

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:22 pm

The Bolt's have lost 3 games by a total of 9 points against stiff competition. They came out of the war with the Stillers in good shape physically. They put points on the board against everyone, and you don't run on them.

The Raiduhs, they pretty much suck on defense and are inconsistent on offense. Their strength would be the long ball, something the Chargers have no clue how to stop. They couldn't hold the Sisters of Mercy under 200 yards through the air. If the Bolt's don't blitz on virtually every play, Collins will eat them alive with Moss, Porter, Gabriel, and Anderson.

After blowing all 3 games in the last 2 minutes, the Bolt's better find a way to stop somebody in the 4th quarter, or they will soon find themselves out of it.

Bolt's..35
Duh's..28

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:45 pm

Pivotal game for Oakland.

Lose and they are not only 1-4, but they are 0-3 v. the AFC, and 0-2 within the division, with both losses coming at home. *ouch*.

Win and they get out of last place at 2-3 with another home game v. so-so Buffalo the next week.

My head says SD wins a VERY close game on Sunday, but my large Silver and Black heart won't allow me to call that.

Instead I call a close Raiduh win.

Reasons...?

1. The obvious. Oakland is totally rested and prepared, coming off the bye week. SD is the opposite, playing on a short week and having to then travel.

2. Oakland's passing game should hit a few biggies v. the Blots suspect secondary.

3. Oakland has stopped the run quite well so far this year. They have not faced a running attack like LT and the Blots, however. BIG test.

Oakland loses this game if their penalties are not kept well in check.

DISCIPLINE......an absolute must.

Raiders - 20
Bolts - 19

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:47 pm

poptart wrote:Oakland loses this game if their penalties are not kept well in check.

If discipline decides the game for the Raiders, you might as well go Michael Hutchence right now and get it over with.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:56 pm

Keeping the penalty yard total under.....oh, say 80, might make me smile.

Baby steps.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:36 pm

Raiders win an ugly low scoring game(ala old school mid nineties Raider Charger games).

Raiders 12 Chargers 6

KUTTER · Post by **KUTTER** » Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:30 am

LT goes nuts, 180+ and 2 TDs. Moss goes equally nuts, 150+ and 2 TDs. Brees to Gates is the difference...

Chargers 34

Raiders 27

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:39 am

Mid-season, and raiduh myopia is in mid-season form. :roll:

trev · Post by **trev** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:08 am

kcdave wrote:Mid-season, and raiduh myopia is in mid-season form. :roll:

myopia? I thought it was a cool, collected confidence coming from Raider fan. :wink:

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:10 am

trev wrote:

l to r: Dennis "BTK" Raiderr... Rader, Mrs. Rader

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:56 am

^^^^^^

Bwa! Made me laugh!

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:56 pm

The Oakland Raiders, The Team of the Decades, face the San Diego Chargers, fellow member of the American Football Conference Western Division, this Sunday at McAfee Coliseum. This Sunday's game marks the 91st league meeting between the Raiders and Chargers. The Raiders hold a 54-34-2 advantage in regular season contests over San Diego since 1960 when the teams began pro football competition as original members of the American Football League

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:48 pm

mvscal wrote:
The Assassin wrote:Raiders win an ugly low scoring game(ala old school mid nineties Raider Charger games).

Raiders 12 Chargers 6
This is a joke...right?

No,the joke is what you're packin in your pants.

Raider Charger games in Oakland are always close and tough. These 2 teams cannot afford another loss and I expect both teams to step it up defensively.

trev · Post by **trev** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:08 pm

mvscal wrote:
The Assassin wrote:I expect both teams to step it up defensively.
With what?

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:18 pm

trev wrote:
mvscal wrote:
The Assassin wrote:I expect both teams to step it up defensively.
With what?

trev · Post by **trev** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:40 pm

Don't roll your eyes at me.

Care to answer the funny question?

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:41 pm

sig bets?

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:46 pm

The Oakland Raiders, The Team of the Decades

What decades might that be? Do they still drag out that bs "best record since 1963 crap?"

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:52 pm

Oakland is allowing just 3.4 yds per carry, 2nd in the AFC.

They've given up 99 yds a game on the ground.

Pretty good numbers.

They have shown that they can be hit through the air, however.

Trouble is, SD's offense is primarily a running threat, with Brees throwing for just 200 yds a game.

Numbers don't at all suggest that SD will light up the scoreboard on Sunday.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:47 pm

Sirfindafold wrote:sig bets?

Abso-freekin-loutely..you're on Sirfindaclue

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:48 pm

trev wrote:Don't roll your eyes at me.

Care to answer the funny question?

Sig bet, doll?

UCant's 2,357th Troll · Fri Oct 14, 2005 6:19 pm

Chargers 51
Raiders 34

Take the over.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:17 pm

It's a division game

Division games are important

That can only mean that Schottenheimer will find a way to lose and lose decisively. He can't help himself.

Raiders by 10 or more

jackass007 · Post by **jackass007** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:59 pm

I had a dream the Raiders won this one.... My dreams never come true

Worst thing to happen to the Raiders last week was the Dolts getting rolled at home

Dolts-31
Gayduhs-14

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:05 am

^^^

Thanks Paul..glad I saw your post before I took 15 minutes of MY time to rip Cooter a new one.

How can someone actually hit submit before pondering the consequences. Of course it happens constantly in here doesn't it?

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:17 am

Cuda wrote:It's a division game

Division games are important

That can only mean that Schottenheimer will find a way to lose and lose decisively. He can't help himself.

Raiders by 10 or more

RACK

Too bad fucking Coods knows more about football that KC Porkalicious and ChargetteJurassicPark combined.

Congrats on keepeing your 'Top Calibre Tard' status alive and well you fucking laughable manrod gobbling ass commandos.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:41 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Coods PWNS me

We know you chocolate bleeding slut, we know.

KC AssPorked with 3.0 inches of dudedrumstick wrote: Mike, ~slurp slurp~ I went back to look at Marty's record *ball fondle* against the primer and soot since 1989:

21-5

:roll: X the size of your mantitties

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:18 am

"The Raiders really do not play very well against Marty Schottenheimer-coached teams."

Sin,

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:25 am

Brees torched em for 6 TD's in 2 games last year...fodder for RJ

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:30 am

Mike, 'course you already know, most 'duh fans have no fodder.

Most have just a mudder.

Bastard children who piss on lids.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:43 pm

The Chargers are a hard team to peg right now. They play their best on the road as under dogs. I've said it many times before, signing your own players and maintaining the status quo is really falling behind in the NFL. This team could use a serious talent boost, and having Rivers the Chargers #1 pick two years ago riding the pine is the reason they don't.

Robert Gallery, Larry Fitzgerald, Sean Taylor....anyone of those guys would be a huge upgrade for San Diego. Not to mention Eli or big Ben, both of whom I suspect will be better than Rivers.

Enough of the rant. With the Bolts defense, getting a 3 and out about being as likely as winning the lotto, the Chargers need to have possession of the ball at the end of the game to win. Of course the same can be said of the primer & soot.

The Bolts have better leadership on the field & on the sidelines. The Chargers also usually play better in Oakland than they do in San Diego. Hell what does it matter? I’ll never pick the primer & soot over the Bolts anyway.

Chargers - 31

Primer & soot - 30

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:39 pm

Nice pass there Kerry, you over shot Grass Moss by at least 5 yards and got picked off.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:47 pm

RACK LT.

Two 1st qtr TDs - one pass and one run.

drummer · Post by **drummer** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:48 pm

Well , of course , I can't watch the game right now , even though I live across the Bay in SF .

Denver vs. NE on CBS right now .

I wonder why ?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:52 pm

Moss is down.
Bummer, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

jackass007 · Post by **jackass007** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:53 pm

I'll give you play by play here..

Chargers have the ball...handoff Tolinson-TD

Raiders have the ball..1 yard gain by Jordon, then Collins chucks it up to Moss in double coverage..

times this by 20 and that's your game

jackass007 · Post by **jackass007** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:55 pm

Mikey wrote:Moss is down.
Bummer, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

they'll be better without him

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:27 pm

Mikey wrote:RACK LT.

Two 1st qtr TDs - one pass and one run.

LOL!!

Now he throws one.

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:29 pm

Hey Oakland, got plunger?

Love all the empty seats in that dump, can't even sell out for one of your biggest rivals.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:33 pm

Can't get the game here at work- what's going on with Moss? Is he out? I can only see he got hurt...