Chiefs at Blots - Early Thoughts

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:33 pm

Diogenes wrote:
Tomlinson goes for at least 150 yards.

Sig bet? [/b]

By "goes for at least 150 yards" I'll clarify just so there's no confusion:

Dio wagers a one week sig bet that Ladanian Tomlinson rushes for 150 total yards on Sunday vs. the Chiefs.

It's a bet

Frank Football · Post by **Frank Football** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:44 pm

poptart wrote:Paul, douche, a recap is in order.

You (like pussy Jeff) took a sig bet, lost, were tagged with a sig (that did NOT violate board rules in any fashion), and refused to wear the sig.

As a matter of public record, you are a welcher.

Your given reason for refusing the sig that was given you?

It somehow violated your oh-so-tender sensibilites as a verrah patriotic American.

Nevermind that NOBODY on the board stood up and took sides with you on the issue.
Nevermind that the sig in question came not close to breaking any board rule.

No, the fact of the matter was that YOU simply took a stand, as a baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet sort of fella, and declared that you couldn't stoop to accept a Paul Walker Lindh reference in the sig given to you.

Paul Walker Lindh.......oh so sick, twisted, and anti-American.

So now here you are in this thread running Pearl Harbor smack.

Not only that, but you are running it from the point of view of how delightful it was for the Japs to get off on the US.

I'm a man of 2nd chances.....3rd, 4th...or 5th.

Come correct right now.

Apologize for your idiocy in not accepting that sig given to you.

Be done with it.

That, or shut your fat pie hole, your ridiculous pile of pig slop.

RACK THAT!!!!

RuPaul Walker Lindh will get back to you after he finishes slamming cakes, pies, eclairs, candy and fudge........

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 10:47 pm

150 yards rushing, correct.

Degenerate gamblers take note. since this means me and my jinx factor just singlehandedly shut down LT. the smart money now is on KC.

You still want the over. BTW.

Predictions don't work, just bets.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:24 am

Diogenes wrote:Degenerate gamblers take note. since this means me and my jinx factor just singlehandedly shut down LT. the smart money now is on KC.

Not necessarily, bro. :twisted:

Btw, I bet on KC this weekend. Knowing my luck, LT will run for 151, and the Chargers will win by 7.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:30 am

RadioFan wrote:
Diogenes wrote:Degenerate gamblers take note. since this means me and my jinx factor just singlehandedly shut down LT. the smart money now is on KC.
Not necessarily, bro. :twisted:

Btw, I bet on KC this weekend. Knowing my luck, LT will run for 151, and the Chargers will win by 7.

More likely (now) he runs for 145 and recieves for another 50 or so.

Still a tossup to see whose secondary can suck the most.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:53 am

We all know that 'bout anything is fair game for smack so long as it's not against board rules, Paul.

Some things I personally don't care to use.
Everyone has their own standard, I s'pose.

Thick skin is pretty much a requirement if one plans to mix it up in here over a period of time, like a bunch of us have.

I just find it 'interesting' that you'd choose to run Pearl Harbor smack (from the JAP point of view, no less) when you squeeeeled like stuck pig when you were required to wear a Walker Lindh reference as part of a sig.

And btw, the board didn't 'melt down' when you began your welching fiasco, fat boy.

No, as in the case with Jeff, the board ran over you like a rat in the middle of the freeway.

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:57 am

Who woulda thunk a Chiefs/Bolt game thread would reach 5 pages?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:12 am

Hell, it'd be 6 if Q hadn't trimmed off a certain 'tards maunderings.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 2:23 am

War Wagon wrote:Hell, it'd be 6 if Q hadn't created a whole new thread for certain 'tards' pant-sniffings.

And you're in the wrong one, loser.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:12 am

Diogenes wrote:Still a tossup to see whose secondary can suck the most.

Nah ... if you're betting with the Bolts, you're solid on that one. Unless of course it comes down to Marty, punting again, with more than 2 minutes. :twisted:

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:58 pm

Bwhaha....nice thread Truman.

The biggest difference between the Bolts last year and this, is the Oline or lack there of. Yes, Philly played excellent defense last week but don’t let that fool you into believing their defense is as good as the stats Vs the Bolts suggest.

Charger Oline coach Carl Mauck has played a big role in the problem. He is obviously no where near the coach Hudson Houck was. He should have known Bob Hallen is a scrub and incapable of starting as a center for injured Nick Hardwick. The guy is such a weak blocker he can't even hold his own as a guard. Yet Mauck or Marty has kept him on the team and started him at Center because of experience. Obviously the type of experience must not matter because Hallen has always been a scrub.

What Mauck should have done is move ORG Mike Goff to center. At least Goff knows what he is doing and has played well at center in his career. They could have played rookie Scott Mruczkowski at Goff's right guard position, the kid played well in preseason. Backup OLG Kris Dielman just plain sucks. The more I watch the guy the more I think he is only on the team because he's a Marty favorite. The teams blind support of him makes no sense. He probably messes up 1/4 to 1/3 of his blocks in one way or another which is way too much for a starter or even backup. They would have been better playing backup OT Leander Jordan there. Of course Jordan sucks too, as a tackle. The guy is just too slow to play tackle and that’s his problem. Playing guard he wouldn't have to move laterally so much and probably not play so badly. It's not like he hasn't played as a guard because he has. I would rather see Jordan at guard than Dielman who plays on his knees or on his back way too often and is no where close to the dominating blocker Fonti was when he‘s healthy and in shape . It's also obvious that ORT Shane Olivea was limited due to injury, but the Chargers don’t have anybody else to play there. Over the last few years Charger GM AJ Smith has neglected the Oline using 2nd day picks in the draft, and signing veteran journeymen. Now the lack of depth is holding the Chargers back. I expect LT to do better Vs the Chiefs, but nothing outrageous.

The Charger defense last week played as good as I’ve seen it since the Seau and Rodney Harrison days. They’ll need to suck it up and make a couple of big plays for San Diego to secure the victory. Well at least one big play.

Chargers - 27

Griefs - 23

Off to the tailgate party........ :wink: :D

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:07 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Bwhaha....nice thread Truman.

The biggest difference between the Bolts last year and this, is the Oline or lack there of. Yes, Philly played excellent defense last week but don’t let that fool you into believing their defense is as good as the stats Vs the Bolts suggest.

Are you insane? That O line allowed LT to average 109 YPG before the Birds game. Philly's run D is alot better than their stats show- see below for something I posted in a different thread-

Philly's run D is better than the stats show... They lost Trotter in week 1 and gave up 200 yards rushing, they were short Darwin Walker against Dallas which killed them... but with the whole healthy defense they had the LT game, held Lamont Jordan to 19 yards on 16 attempts and other than first two poseesion of the KC game (in which Priest ran for 61 yards on 10 carries- which is unacceptable) they held him to 23 yards on 9 carries and LJ to 34 yards on 7 carries (one of which was a 21 yard scamper).

They shut him down. You can make all the excuses you want- but they were able to lock down LT- something EVERYONE said couldn't happen.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:16 pm

BBMarley it's not too easy to run between the Tackles when the Center is getting his ass handed to him every play. I gave Philly credit for playing "excellent D", I just believe if the Chargers had their starters playing the out come would have been much different, and not that close.

I also believe Philly won't come close too matching that performance again this year. Not to mention McNabb's injury won't get better, and his lack of a deep ball brings the Eagles back to the NFC East pack, because their offense (80% passes 15 yards or less) is much easier to defend.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:24 pm

They shut him down by stacking the line and counting on their CBs to cover the Dolts weak ass incompletion corps.

The Chiefs don't have the defenders to repeat that.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:27 pm

I think over the course of the next few weeks- you'll see the ball run more... They have been behind alot early- and makes them throw. They tried to run early last week- but penalties and s atuch SD run D killed them. I don't think this week will get much better as Denver is much better against the run than the D- but it will get better. They'll never be 50-50, that's not Reid's cochaing style- never has been- but 65-35, 60-40 percent are very possible over the next few weeks.

Plus- Westbrook still takes alot of swing passes and get rolled into the flat alot- which they look at as a running game due to the mismatch he provides against a LB. This makes the 75% passing harder to defend than a standard WR. If #5 can get his long passes back- they will be able to exploit the mismatches again in the secondary as well...

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:56 pm

Bwahahahaha, the HB pass from LT to Parker works again as the Chef D looks dumbfounded!

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:09 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
trev wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:DELETE TREV AND HER DEAD FISH-SMELLING PUSSY
RACK
RACK X2.

I'm back Wussy. With a W.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:23 am

trev wrote: I'm back Wussy. With a W.

Looks like the kids will be taking Mom's Hangover Route to school in the morning, eh?

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:25 am

JHawkBCD wrote:
trev wrote: I'm back Wussy. With a W.

Looks like the kids will be taking Mom's Hangover Route to school in the morning, eh?

My kids aren't up for discussion, pedo.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:29 pm

trev wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
trev wrote: RACK
RACK X2.
I'm back Wussy. With a W.

[marq=left] RRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!![/marq]
[marq=down]

[/marq]
[marq=up]

[/marq]

Truman, make your tyme motherfucker-your beatdown is near. UNRACK that shitty half assed post your cock massagers typed my way.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:33 pm

Say, what happened in the Chargers/Chefs game yesterday?

When the Raiders kick the shit out of the Chefs next week, Chefs will be in the division basement, btw. Might as well get comfy, Cheffan; you'll be there a while.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 7:02 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: "I'll drink to that." -trev

"NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!" -trev's kids

Rack Paul.

[stream]http://www.opheliagroove.com/audio/wav/dorkalert.wav[/stream]

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 7:07 pm

Bwha

Who's your Daddy?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:03 pm

Cuda wrote: The Chefs finish 10-6? BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That's something only a True Fan would say. Don't confuse my Queef bashing with being any sort of a fan of the Broncos or any other pro team. You look at these things wearing blinders and rose colored glasses. I look at them with cold, hard analysis and a bit of history-based intuition.

I don't see any likely scenario where the Chefs finish 10-6, nor do I see any likely scenario where they don't finish at least a game or two behind the Chargers. The only likely scenario I see for the Chefs is for them to end up no better than 3rd in the division- and even that depends more on how the Raiders second half of the season goes than how the Chefs final 8 games end up. Playoffs? Don't be talking about playoffs.

That's what I thought you said.

RACK!

Genius take!

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:49 am

Cuda wrote:
Cuda wrote: The Chefs finish 10-6? BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That's something only a True Fan would say. Don't confuse my Queef bashing with being any sort of a fan of the Broncos or any other pro team. You look at these things wearing blinders and rose colored glasses. I look at them with cold, hard analysis and a bit of history-based intuition.

I don't see any likely scenario where the Chefs finish 10-6, nor do I see any likely scenario where they don't finish at least a game or two behind the Chargers. The only likely scenario I see for the Chefs is for them to end up no better than 3rd in the division- and even that depends more on how the Raiders second half of the season goes than how the Chefs final 8 games end up. Playoffs? Don't be talking about playoffs.
That's what I thought you said.

RACK!

Genius take!

Hmmm, genius?

The quote you're racking yourself for hasn't taken place, nor is it likely to take place.

Pre-mature ejaculation much, knucklefuck?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:20 am

Raydah Flames wrote:
Truman, make your tyme motherfucker-your beatdown is near. UNRACK that shitty half assed post your cock massagers typed my way.

Hmmm... I dunno Wags. Think I ougtta buy a coupla vowels or go ahead and solve the puzzle?

War Cognitive Coherency

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:55 pm

KC Honey May I? 3.0 wrote:RACKING yourself now Coods....what a sad bitter little bitterman.

Laughing at dumbfucks like you, Whitey & Truman while you melt isn't exactly an indicator of sadness.

And why would I be bitter, seeing as how I was exactly right about the Chefs taking a huge dump in Chargerville?

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:55 pm

^^^ NOT a meltdown?

bwahahahahahaha.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:55 pm

Truman wrote:
Raydah Flames wrote:
Truman, make your tyme motherfucker-your beatdown is near. UNRACK that shitty half assed post your cock massagers typed my way.
Hmmm... I dunno Wags. Think I ougtta buy a coupla vowels or go ahead and solve the puzzle?

War Cognitive Coherency

Spelling smack. Epic.

Yes, those "buy a vowel" blasts are very ground breaking.

Bottom line is this Tru: You're not in kansas anymore, Pussy. (Well, you are, bitch

) You arent surrounded by all your KC defender of the kotex red faith anymore like the other board-and while your half assed pathetically unfunny posts may get racked by your fellow cocksuckers in crime (mostly due to them being unoriginal dickmonkeys as well), they will serve as nothing more than a softball sitting on a tee for the cats here like myself to blast out of the ballpark.

The days of you KC pussies lapping up each other's ass piss over mediocre posts are long over. It has long been established here that the KC contingent swim in the cesspool of mediocrity together, all the fucking time.

Now that you've been brought up to speed, go ahead and change that fucking milk carton in your avatar to yourself, cunt-Im sure you'll be gone again after the latest ass pounding of your team and your shit smack.

Fucking pussy.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 7:50 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Cuda wrote:^^^ NOT a meltdown.
Yes, correct. See Coods, there's hope for you yet.

Raydah James wrote:the KC contingent swim in the cesspool of mediocrity together, all the fucking time.

Beautiful.

If shit posts were measured in blowjobs, the entire fucking KC Goof Troop would be walking jizz soaked mouths.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:35 pm

KC Bacon-Cheddar Melt 3.0 wrote:
Clueless Lames wrote:the KC contingent swim in the cesspool of mediocrity together, all the fucking time.
Yet your merry squad of miscreants are UNDER .500 and looking UP at US AGAIN in the standings

Not for long.

When the Raiders stomp the raw fuck out of the Chefs this week, they'll be in 3rd place and the Chefs will be in the basement, where, in all probablility, they will finish the season

, AND they haven't beaten US since 2002.

.

Really?

I wasn't aware of that. That's not exactly a good thing for the Chefs; it stacks the odds even more in favor of Oakland

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:11 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Clueless Lames wrote:the KC contingent swim in the cesspool of mediocrity together, all the fucking time.
Yet your merry squad of miscreants are UNDER .500 and looking UP at US AGAIN in the standings, AND they haven't beaten US since 2002.

Again, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

And once again you prove to the entire forum what a fucking moron looks like up close and personal-In saying that KC's squad of God's Special drooling fuckups breast strokes daily in the cesspool of mediocrity, I meant that the collection of you top level tards blow monkey spunk in the posting arena. Every. Fucking. Day. And every last one of you.

Christ, you're stupid. No wonder your wife smacks your crop circle balding head every week after jacking your paycheck and laughing at your lifelong ineptitude. Now get going on that laundry before she Ike's your punkass up. Bitch.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:27 pm

We got Cuda, Charger fan and Raider fan all giving each other reach arounds in here. What a fucking disfunctional orgy. :puke:

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:34 pm

If by reacharound, you mean slapping Grieffan senseless, then fuckin-a-yeah!

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:42 pm

Nix, they all have sore twats from being smacked around by Chiefsfan constantly.

Same as it ever was, and same as it always will be.

Bitter little bitches, aren't they?

The more they squeal and cry, the more :bode:

TDOTRF collect.

Not to mention, money orders and cashiers checks.

Hey Cooter, show some sack and back up your bold words with some cash, Bitch. Otherwise, you're just a mewling little pussy.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:53 pm

What's with the new sig, Whitey?

Did Mizzou's beatdown on the Corn lead you to believe they'd have the same good fortune vs. Kansas? The same frontal lobe malformation that led you to believe that (how'd it work out for you, btw?) leads you to believe Grieffan ever smacked anybody around.

You're pretty much always good for a laugh, though. Maybe one day you'll figure out why that is

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:46 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: also sack up and accept the sig of the person we bet against.

Buwahahahaha! Tears jerry, tears.

If I were you, I wouldn't try to smack somebody for their accepted bet sig when you're too much of a CUNT to accept a sig bet yourself.

[marq=left]BUWAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAA(Deep Breath)AHAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA [/marq]

Continue your merry crusade to the Cryin' Ryan Holy Grail....

A pack of fucking wild dingos would learn thier lesson sooner than you would concerning a 3rd straight Cryin Ryan. Not to worry paul, there will never be a tard absolutely stupid enough to pry the Cryin Trifecta from your cold, easter seal hands.......EVER.

Your title is forever safe, pursestrings paul.

BTW-Whens dinner going to be ready, bitch? Best have those dishes done afterward, too.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:56 pm

Paula, I'll give you the same answer I gave Whitey:

Why the fuck would I make a sig bet with your Special Olympian ass?

1. There is nothing to fear, on my part, of losing; and,

2. There's nothing in it for me if I win. There's just no way I could come up with anything to embarrass you or make you look like a bigger fucking tard than you make yourself look every fucking day right here.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:31 pm

I rest my case

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:40 pm

Chiefs at Blots - Late Thoughts

Just sayin'