Ucla could be the worst 8-1 team in history.....

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:28 am

This post was typed at midway through the 2nd qtr.....

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:42 am

I'd have to agree. Considering they could be 4-4 right now.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:17 am

Nice try at reverse psychology there, Seer, but we're all familiar with UCLA's SOP by now.

UCLA 45
UA 38

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:30 am

I think we should learn from watching UCLA and USC that no game is decided after 30 minutes. Until they lose, they haven't lost... :wink:

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:35 am

Uh, they've lost....45-7. 10:00 left in the 3rd.....they've lost big.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:13 am

Fucking pathetic!

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:14 am

Well at least someone finally showed what the real UCLA looks like.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:50 am

Ucla is 1-9 in November under Doe-rrell. Drew Olson (Paus) was never mentioned by me as being anything but a below avg QB having an uncharacteristic year.

Ucla might eke out a win vs. Az St.

Then giving Doe-rrell 2 weeks to plan vs. SuC, we will get beat by 60.

Go to a mid-range bowl and get beat by 40.

Doe-rrell sucks as a "coach".

They've begun the last 5 games like they sleepwalk.

A "coach" would recognize that tendency and correct it. Doe-rrell let is get worse as the season went on. But, hey! It's Ucla and we are still "politically correct" having one of the 3 black head "coaches" in the country.....and that apparently amounts to more than creating and sustaining high expectations of excellence....

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:53 am

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:24 am

Are you watching the VT game? Where can I get a heavy duty shower rod?

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:29 am

Well, that should clear up some of the Heisman debates out there.

I thought UCLA would lose. Never thought they'd get butcher-raped like that. unWar.

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:30 am

ps On a positive note, Kal lost.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:58 am

Laxplayer wrote:Uh, they've lost....45-7. 10:00 left in the 3rd.....they've lost big.

Yeah, that was a pathetic effort. Nothing quite like seeing a national title contender blow it all by getting rolled by a 2-win team. Absolutely hideous...

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:18 pm

I had Oregon as one of our 5 losses on the way to the Rose Bowl.
Sin,
M2

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:20 pm

I think heavy consideration should go to ND in 2002 after the BC game.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:44 pm

I was hoping UCLA would be undefeated by the time they played SC. That would've finally been a Pac 10 game that people all around the country would've cared about.